Skip to main content

Inductive Complexity of P versus NP Problem

Extended Abstract

  • Conference paper
Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation (UCNC 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7445))

Abstract

Using the complexity measure developed in [7,3,4] and the extensions obtained by using inductive register machines of various orders in [1,2], we determine an upper bound on the inductive complexity of second order of the P versus NP problem. From this point of view, the P versus NP problem is more complex than the Riemann hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burgin, M.: Super-recursive Algorithms. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Burgin, M., Calude, C.S., Calude, E.: Inductive Complexity Measures for Mathematical Problems. CDMTCS Research Report 416, 11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calude, C.S., Calude, E.: Evaluating the complexity of mathematical problems. Part 1. Complex Systems 18(3), 267–285 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Calude, C.S., Calude, E.: Evaluating the complexity of mathematical problems. Part 2. Complex Systems 18(4), 387–401 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Calude, C.S., Calude, E.: The complexity of the Four Colour Theorem. LMS J. Comput. Math. 13, 414–425 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Calude, C.S., Calude, E.: The Complexity of Mathematical Problems: An Overview of Results and Open Problems. CDMTCS Research Report 410, 12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calude, C.S., Calude, E., Dinneen, M.J.: A new measure of the difficulty of problems. Journal for Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing 12, 285–307 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Calude, C.S., Calude, E., Queen, M.S.: The complexity of Euler’s integer partition theorem. Theoretical Computer Science (2012), doi:10.1016./j.tcs.2012.03.02

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calude, C.S., Calude, E., Svozil, K.: The complexity of proving chaoticity and the Church-Turing Thesis. Chaos 20, 037103, 1–5 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Calude, C.S.: Information and Randomness: An Algorithmic Perspective, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2002) (revised and extended)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Calude, E.: The complexity of Riemann’s Hypothesis. Journal for Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing 18(3-4), 257–265 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook, S.: The complexity of theorem proving procedures. In: STOC 1971, Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 151–158. ACM, New York (1971)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook, S.: The P versus NP Problem, 12 pages (manuscript), http://www.claymath.org/millennium/P_vs_NP/pvsnp.pdf (visited on June 16, 2012)

  14. Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd edn. MIT Press and McGraw-Hill (2001) [1990]

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dinneen, M.J.: A Program-Size Complexity Measure for Mathematical Problems and Conjectures. In: Dinneen, M.J., Khoussainov, B., Nies, A. (eds.) Computation, Physics and Beyond. LNCS, vol. 7160, pp. 81–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Fortnow, L.: The status of the P vs NP problem. CACM 52(9), 78–86 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horowitz, E., Sahni, S.: Computing partitions with applications to the knapsack problem. JACM 21, 277–292 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson, A.: Interview with Martin Davis. Notices AMS 55(5), 560–571 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Levin, L.: Universal search problems. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 9, 265–266 (1973) (in Russian), English translation in [22]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, C., Mertens, S.: The Nature of Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mulmuley, K.D.: The GCT program toward the P vs NP problem. CACM 55(6), 98–107 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trakhtenbrot, B.A.: A survey of Russian approaches to Perebor (brute-force search) algorithms. Annals of the History of Computing 6, 384–400 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.claymath.org/millennium/P_vs_NP/ (visited on June 16, 2012)

  24. http://www.claymath.org/millennium/Riemann_Hypothesis/ (visited on June 16, 2012)

  25. Wöginger, G.J.: The P-versus-NP webpage, http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP.htm (visited on June 16, 2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Calude, C.S., Calude, E., Queen, M.S. (2012). Inductive Complexity of P versus NP Problem. In: Durand-Lose, J., Jonoska, N. (eds) Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation. UCNC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7445. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32894-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32894-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32893-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32894-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics