Abstract
This paper introduces a framework that integrates a reasoner based on defeasible argumentation with a large information repository backed by one or several relational databases. In our scenario, we assume that the databases involved are updated by external independent applications, possibly introducing inconsistencies in a particular database, or leading to inconsistency among the subset of databases that refer to the same data. Argumentation reasoning will contribute with the possibility of obtaining consistent answers from the information repository with the properties described. We present the Database Integration for Defeasible Logic Programming (DBI-DeLP) framework, which enables commonsense reasoning based on Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) by extending the system capabilities to handle large amounts of data and providing consistent answers for queries posed to it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Dunne, P.E.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 171, 619–641 (2007)
Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. The MIT Press (2008)
Rahwan, I., Simari, G.R.: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer (2009)
Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7(1) (1997)
Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 170(2), 114–159 (2006)
Amgoud, L., Kaci, S.: An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 527–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Defeasible logic programming an argumentative approach. TPLP, 95–138 (2004)
Stolzenburg, F., García, A.J., Chesñevar, C.I., Simari, G.R.: Computing generalized specificity. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13(1), 87–113 (2003)
Santos, E., Martins, J.P., Galhardas, H.: An argumentation-based approach to database repair. In: 19th European Conf. on AI (ECAI), pp. 125–130 (2010)
Celle, A., Bertossi, L.: Querying Inconsistent Databases: Algorithms and Implementation. In: Palamidessi, C., Moniz Pereira, L., Lloyd, J.W., Dahl, V., Furbach, U., Kerber, M., Lau, K.-K., Sagiv, Y., Stuckey, P.J. (eds.) CL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1861, pp. 942–956. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Bertossi, L.: Consistent query answering in databases. SIGMOD Record 35(2), 68–76 (2006)
Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G., Vlahavas, I.P.: A defeasible logic reasoner for the semantic web. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst. 2(1), 1–41 (2006)
Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T.: Introduction to Inconsistency Tolerance. In: Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T. (eds.) Inconsistency Tolerance. LNCS, vol. 3300, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Deagustini, C.A.D., Fulladoza Dalibón, S.E., Gottifredi, S., Falappa, M.A., Simari, G.R. (2012). Consistent Query Answering Using Relational Databases through Argumentation. In: Liddle, S.W., Schewe, KD., Tjoa, A.M., Zhou, X. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7447. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32597-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32597-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32596-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32597-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)