Skip to main content

Consistent Query Answering Using Relational Databases through Argumentation

  • Conference paper
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2012)

Abstract

This paper introduces a framework that integrates a reasoner based on defeasible argumentation with a large information repository backed by one or several relational databases. In our scenario, we assume that the databases involved are updated by external independent applications, possibly introducing inconsistencies in a particular database, or leading to inconsistency among the subset of databases that refer to the same data. Argumentation reasoning will contribute with the possibility of obtaining consistent answers from the information repository with the properties described. We present the Database Integration for Defeasible Logic Programming (DBI-DeLP) framework, which enables commonsense reasoning based on Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) by extending the system capabilities to handle large amounts of data and providing consistent answers for queries posed to it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Dunne, P.E.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 171, 619–641 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. The MIT Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rahwan, I., Simari, G.R.: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7(1) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 170(2), 114–159 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Amgoud, L., Kaci, S.: An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 527–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Defeasible logic programming an argumentative approach. TPLP, 95–138 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stolzenburg, F., García, A.J., Chesñevar, C.I., Simari, G.R.: Computing generalized specificity. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13(1), 87–113 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Santos, E., Martins, J.P., Galhardas, H.: An argumentation-based approach to database repair. In: 19th European Conf. on AI (ECAI), pp. 125–130 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Celle, A., Bertossi, L.: Querying Inconsistent Databases: Algorithms and Implementation. In: Palamidessi, C., Moniz Pereira, L., Lloyd, J.W., Dahl, V., Furbach, U., Kerber, M., Lau, K.-K., Sagiv, Y., Stuckey, P.J. (eds.) CL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1861, pp. 942–956. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bertossi, L.: Consistent query answering in databases. SIGMOD Record 35(2), 68–76 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G., Vlahavas, I.P.: A defeasible logic reasoner for the semantic web. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst. 2(1), 1–41 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T.: Introduction to Inconsistency Tolerance. In: Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T. (eds.) Inconsistency Tolerance. LNCS, vol. 3300, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deagustini, C.A.D., Fulladoza Dalibón, S.E., Gottifredi, S., Falappa, M.A., Simari, G.R. (2012). Consistent Query Answering Using Relational Databases through Argumentation. In: Liddle, S.W., Schewe, KD., Tjoa, A.M., Zhou, X. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7447. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32597-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32597-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32596-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32597-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics