Skip to main content

DPOT Methodology: An Application to Value-at-Risk

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Developments in Modeling and Applications in Statistics

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics ((STASSPSS))

Abstract

Threshold methods, based on fitting a stochastic model to the excesses over a threshold, were developed under the acronym POT (peaks over threshold). To eliminate the tendency to clustering of violations, a model-based approach within the POT framework, which uses the durations between excesses as covariates, is presented. Based on this approach we suggest models to forecast one-day-ahead Value-at-Risk and apply these models to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. Out of sample results provide evidence that they can perform better than state-of-the art risk models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Araújo Santos, P., Fraga Alves, M.I.: VaR prediction with a duration based POT method. In: Proceedings of the ISF2010, 30th International Symposium on Forecasting, San Diego, CA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Araújo Santos, P., Fraga Alves, M.I.: A new class of independence tests for interval forecasts evaluation. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56, 3366–3380 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.csda2010.10.002

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balkema, A.A., de Haan, L.: Residual life time at great age. Ann. Probab. 2, 792–804 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bekiros, S.D., Georgoutsos, D.A.: Estimation of value-at-risk by extreme value and conventional methods: a comparative evaluation of their predictive performance. J. Int. Financ. Markets Institut. Money 15(3), 2009–2228 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berkowitz, J., Christoffersen P., Pelletier D.: Evaluating value-at-risk models with desk-level data. Management Science, Published online in Articles in Advance (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Byström, H.: Managing extreme risks in tranquil and volatile markets using conditional extreme value theory. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 13, 133–152 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christoffersen P.: Evaluating intervals forecasts. Int. Econ. Rev. 39, 841–862 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diebold, F.X., Schuermann, T., Stroughair, J.D.: Pitfalls and opportunities in the use of extreme value theory in risk management. Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (1998), pp. 98–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., Mikosch, T.: Modeling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Springer, Berlin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engel, R.F., Manganelli, S.: CAViaR: conditional autoregressive value-at-risk by regression quantiles. J. Business Econ. Stat. 22, 367–381 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghorbel, A., Trabelsi, A.: Predictive performance of conditional extreme value theory in value-at-risk estimation. Int. J. Monet. Econ. Finance 1, 121–147 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jorian, P.: Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuester, K., Mittik, S., Paolella, M.S.: Value-at-risk prediction: a comparison of alternative strategies. J. Financ. Econometrics 4, 53–89 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kupiec, P.: Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. J. Derivat. 3, 73–84 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McNeil, A.J., Frey, R.: Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach. J. Empirical Finance 7, 271–300 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ozun, A., Cifter, A., Yilmazer, S.: Filtered extreme value theory for value-at-risk estimation: evidence from Turkey. J. Risk Finance Incorporat. Balance Sheet 11, 164–179 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pickands III, J.: Statistical inference using extreme value order statistics. Ann. Stat. 3, 119–131 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  18. R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org (2010)

  19. Smith, R.: Estimating tails of probability distributions. Ann. Stat. 15, 1174–1207 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, R.: Models for exceedances over high thresholds. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 52, 393–442 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tsay, R.: Analysis of Financial Time Series. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by National Funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, FCT//PTDC/MAT/101736/2008, EXTREMA project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. I. Fraga Alves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alves, M.I.F., Santos, P.A. (2013). DPOT Methodology: An Application to Value-at-Risk. In: Oliveira, P., da Graça Temido, M., Henriques, C., Vichi, M. (eds) Recent Developments in Modeling and Applications in Statistics. Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32419-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics