Skip to main content

Concentration Analysis Using Microgreographic Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defining the Spatial Scale in Modern Regional Analysis

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 1124 Accesses

Abstract

Analysis of spatial distribution of economic activity has plenty of implications in several areas like urban planning, infrastructures, firm supporting policies and land use, among others, and is receiving an increasing attention by researchers. Most of analyses of spatial distribution of economic activity have been carried out using extant administrative units (e.g., counties, regions, etc.), but unfortunately, these analyses suffer from the shortcoming that administrative units vary greatly in size and shape, do not always coincide with real economic areas and are sometimes arbitrary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are also other approaches such as those that use the stochastic methodology of Point Pattern or those that use Neuronal Networks for pattern recognition. However, these approaches are not able to do the multisectorial analyses that are the goal of this work. For a discussion about whether administrative units match functional or economic units see Parr (2008).

  2. 2.

    See, among others, the applications of Boix and Galletto (2008) for Spain and De Propris (2005) for the UK.

  3. 3.

    Applications for services are scarce. See, for instance, Sforzi (1999).

  4. 4.

    See Guimarães et al. (2011) for an application about how to solve biases caused by previous measures that do not take into account spatial position of units.

  5. 5.

    Concretely, Boix and Galletto (2008) identify four axes where specialized industrial district are of great importance: the main axis runs across the Mediterranean coast from the north of Catalonia to the south of Murcia; the second one links the south of Catalonia to the Basque Country and North-East of Castile and León; the third one goes South from Madrid to the provinces of Toledo, Ciudad Real, Jaen and Córdoba; and the last one is scattered across the provinces of Pontevedra and A Coruña (North-West of Spain).

  6. 6.

    See Openshaw and Taylor (1979) for a detailed analysis and Wrigley (1995) for a further review.

  7. 7.

    See, nevertheless, papers by Arauzo-Carod and Manjón-Antolín (2004) and Arauzo-Carod (2008) about the implications for industrial location analysis. See also Olsen (2002) for a broad discussion of the units to be used in geographical economics.

  8. 8.

    See Páez and Scott (2004) for a detailed report of techniques whose results are affected by MAUP problem.

  9. 9.

    We have omitted non mainland parts of Spain due to lack of continuity of Balearic Islands and Canary Islands with the rest of the country, which could cause important biases in our results.

  10. 10.

    It is important to notice that SABI data set is about firms, not establishments, so each firm could have more than one establishment, although most of firms have only one establishment.

  11. 11.

    Other alternative statistical sources such as Censo de Locales (INE) are not currently updated. Although having firms as observation units instead of establishments, the Censo de Locales also provides useful information for locational analysis.

  12. 12.

    There are alternative datasets such as DIRCE (INE) but their data is presented only at two-digit level and geographical location of the firms is also highly spatially aggregated.

  13. 13.

    See, among others, Brenner (2006, 2004) and Ellison and Glaeser (1997) for empirical applications with such administrative units.

  14. 14.

    In view that some of MAUP problems come from size and shape of administrative units we should tackle both issues. While size implications are analysed in detail at beginning of Sect. 15.4, shape problems can be overcomed by using neutral cells, like squares, so we avoid problems linked to ad-hoc designs of geographical units (gerrymandering).

  15. 15.

    Similarly the index could be calculated for bigger cell sizes.

  16. 16.

    In any case, upper levels could be needed in order to analyse multisectorial clusters à la Porter (1998).

  17. 17.

    As an example, indices of high-tech industries such as office machinery, computers and medical equipment, precision and optical instruments (0.644) and electrical machinery and apparatus (0.664) are clearly lower than those of some low-tech industries such as food, beverages and tobacco (1.452) and agriculture and fishing (1.424).

References

  • Albert JM, Casanova MR, Orts V (2012) Spatial location patterns of Spanish manufacturing firms. Pap Reg Sci 91(1):107–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arauzo-Carod JM (2008) Industrial location at a local level: comments on the territorial level of the analysis. J Econ Soc Geogr (Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie) 99:193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arauzo-Carod JM, Manjón-Antolín M (2004) Firm size and geographical aggregation: an empirical appraisal in industrial location. Small Bus Econ 22:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G (2001) Modeling the geography of economic activities on a continuous space. Pap Reg Sci 80:411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G, Espa G, Quah D (2008) A class of spatial econometric methods in the empirical analysis of clusters of firms in the space. Empirical Econ 34:81–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D (1998) Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Rev Econ Pol 14(2):18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista R, Swann P (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more? Res Pol 27:525–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix R, Galletto V (2008) Marshallian industrial districts in Spain. Ital J Reg Sci (Scienze Regionali) 7(3):29–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner T (2004) Local industrial clusters: existence, emergence and evolution. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner T (2006) Identification of local industrial clusters in Germany. Reg Stud 40(9):991–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briant A, Combes P-P, Lafourcade M (2010) Dots to boxes: do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? J Urban Econ 67:287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 84(1):54–70

    Google Scholar 

  • De Propris L (2005) Mapping local production systems in the UK: methodology and application. Reg Stud 39(2):197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereaux M, Griffith R, Simpson H (2004) The geographic distribution of production activity in the UK. Reg Sci Urban Econ 34(5):533–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G, Overman HG (2005) Testing for localization using microgeographic data. Rev Econ Stud 72:1077–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G, Overman HG (2008) Exploring the detailed location patterns of U.K. manufacturing Industries using microgeographic data. J Reg Sci 48(1):213–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Glaeser EL (1997) Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. J Polit Econ 195:889–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães P, Figueiredo O, Woodward D (2011) Accounting for neighboring effects in measures of spatial concentration. J Reg Sci 51(4):678–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JV (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. J Urban Econ 53(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (2006) Distretti industriali e sistemi locali del lavoro 2001. Istat, Collana Censimenti, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108:577–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Bazo E (ed) (2006) Definición de la metodología de detección e identificación de clusters industriales en España. Dirección General de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa (DGPYME), Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotwick HW, Silverman BW (1982) Methods for analysing spatial processes of several types of points. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 44(3):406–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurel F, Sédillot B (1999) A measure of the geographic concentration in French manufacturing industries. Reg Sci Urban Econ 29:575–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen J (2002) On the units of geographical economics. Geoforum 33:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1979) A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N (ed) Statistical applications in the spatial sciences. Pion, London, pp 127–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Páez A, Scott DM (2004) Spatial statistics for urban analysis: a review of techniques with examples. GeoJournal 61:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paluzie E, Pons J, Tirado D (2004) The geographical concentration of industry across Spanish regions, 1856–1995. Rev Reg Res 24(2):143–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr JB (2008) Administrative spatial structure: a note on an alternative approach. Ann Reg Sci 42:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polèse M, Shearmur R (2006) Growth and location of economic activity: the spatial dynamics of industries in Canada 1971–2001. Growth Change 37(3):362–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv Bus Rev 76(6):77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch JE (1993) Does history matter only when It matters little? The case of city-industry location. Q J Econ 108(3):843–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha HO (2004) Entrepreneurship and development: the role of clusters. Small Bus Econ 23:363–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose A (2001) Local production systems and economic performance in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. In: Crouch C, Le Gales P, Trigilia C, Voelzkow H (eds) Local production systems in Europe: rise or demise? Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rot MC (2006) Introducción al análisis de datos mapeados o algunas de las (muchas) cosas que puedo hacer si tengo coordenadas. Ecosistemas 15(3):19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi F (1990) The quantitative importance of marshallian industrial districts in the Italian economy. In: Pyke F, Becattini G, Sengenberger W (eds) Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy. ILO, Geneva, pp 75–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi F (1999) Economic change. In: Bonavero P, Dematteis G, Sforzi F (eds) The Italian urban system. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinle C, Schiele H (2002) When do industries cluster? A proposal of how to assess an industry’s propensity to concentrate at a single region or nation. Res Pol 31(6):849–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viladecans E (2004) Agglomeration economies and industrial location: city-level evidence. J Econ Geogr 4(5):565–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley N (1995) Revisiting the modifiable areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy. In: Cliff AD, Gould PR, Hoare AG, Thrift NJ (eds) Diffusing geography. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 49–71

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Pablo-Martí .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1 – List of Industries

Appendix 1 – List of Industries

Code

Industry

1

Agriculture and fishing

2

Extractive activities

3

Food, beverages and tobacco

4

Textiles, leather clothes and shoes

5

Wood, furniture and other manufactures

6

Paper and publishing

7

Chemical products

8

Rubber and plastic products

9

Non-metallic mineral products

10

Basic metals

11

Fabricated metal products

12

Machinery and equipment

13

Office machinery, computers and medical equipment, precision and optical instruments

14

Electrical machinery and apparatus

15

Transport materials

16

Recycling

17

Construction

18

Electricity and water distribution

19

Trade and repair

20

Hotels and restaurants

21

Transport and communications

22

Financial intermediation

23

Real estate activities

24

Business services

25

Public administration

26

Education

27

Health and veterinary activities, social services

28

Other services

  1. Source: SABI

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pablo-Martí, F., Arauzo-Carod, JM. (2012). Concentration Analysis Using Microgreographic Data. In: Fernández Vázquez, E., Rubiera Morollón, F. (eds) Defining the Spatial Scale in Modern Regional Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31994-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31994-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31993-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31994-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics