Skip to main content

The Relevance of Results in Interpretive Research in Information Systems and Technology

  • Conference paper
Virtual and Networked Organizations, Emergent Technologies and Tools (ViNOrg 2011)

Abstract

The rigor and relevance of the results is central to the process of scientific investigation, even in areas where the practice prevails, as is the case of the scientific area of information systems and technology. This issue is also particularly relevant when the underlying epistemological orientation is the interpretivism. Based on a literature review focused on interpretive research in the field of information systems and technology, we find that the generalization of research resulting under the interpretive paradigm are valid and are not exclusive to the positivist orientation. This paper explores the importance of interpretative research in the information systems and technology field. As a result we discuss the different perspectives around the generalization and its interpretation in an interpretative research, supporting the investigator in the grounds of validation of their results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Björk, B. C.: A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. disponível em (2006), http://informationr.net/ir/

  2. Marconi, M., Lakatos, E.: Metodologia Científica, São Paulo, Atlas (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carvalho, J.A.: Metodologias de Investigação em Engenharia. Apontamentos da unidade curricular, do Programa Doutoral em Tecnologias e Sistemas de Informação, Universidade do Minho – Departamento de Sistemas de Informação (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blaikie, N.: Designing Social Research. Polity Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vasconcellos, M.J.E.: Pensamento Sistémico: o Novo Paradigma da Ciência, 7a edn. Papirus Editora, São Paulo (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, A., Baskerville, R.: Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 14(3), 221–243 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar, R.: Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feibleman, J.: Pure Science, Applied Science, and Technology: an Attempt at Definitions. In: Mitcham, C., Mackey, R. (eds.) Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, pp. 33–41. The Free Press, NY (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skolimowski, H.: The Structure of Thinking in Technology. In: Mitcham, C., Mackey, R. (eds.) Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, pp. 42–49. The Free Press, NY (1983, 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  10. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information tecnology. Elsevier Science 15, 251–266 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, A.S.: Editorial, /W/SQuarter/y (25:1), pp. iii–vii (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baskerville, R., Myers, M.: Information Systems as a Reference Discipline. MIS Quarterly 26(1), 1–14 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hiershheim, R., Klein, H.: Four Paradigm of Information Systems Development. Communication of the ACM 32(10), 1199–1216 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Avison, D., et al.: Reflection on information systems practice, education and a research: 10 years of the Information Systems Journal. Info Systems Journal 11, 3–22 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Avison, D., et al.: The beginnings of a new era: time to reflect on 17 years of the ISJ. Info Systems Journal 18, 5–21 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLean, E.R.: Information Systems and Its Underlying Disciplines: a Summary of the Papers. Data Base Fall, pp. 3–6 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Santos, B.S.: Um discurso sobre as ciências. Edições Afrontamento, Porto (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walsham, G.: The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research. The management School. University of Lancaster. Lancaster LA1 4YX, UK (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Benbasat, I., Weber, R.: Research Commentary: Rethinking “Diversit:y” in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 7(4), 389–399 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swanson, E.B., Ramiller, N.C.: Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to A New Journal, 1987-1992. Information Systems Research 4(4), 299–330 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Checkland, P., Holwell, S.: Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. Wiley, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, G.: Information Systems Conceptual Foundations: Looking Backward and Forward. In: Baskerville, R., Stage, J., DeGross, J. (eds.) Qrganizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, pp. 61–82. Kluwer, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bacon, C.J., Fitzgerald, B.: A Systemic Framework for the Fiel of Information Systems. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 32(2), 46–67 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Klein, H.K., Myers, M.: A set of Principles for Conduting and Evaluating Interpretative Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–97 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 320–330 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Capra, F.: O Ponto de Mutação: A Ciência, a Sociedade e a Cultura Emergente, 25th edn. Cultrix, São Paulo (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vasconcellos, M.J.E.: Pensamento Sistémico: o Novo Paradigma da Ciência, 7a edn. Papirus Editora, São Paulo (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplan, B., Maxwell, J.A.: Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems. In: Anderson, J.G., Aydin, C.E., Jay, S.J. (eds.) Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications, pp. 45–68. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Department of Management Science, The Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, UK (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferreira, I., Ferreira, S., Ramos, I. (2012). The Relevance of Results in Interpretive Research in Information Systems and Technology. In: Putnik, G.D., Cruz-Cunha, M.M. (eds) Virtual and Networked Organizations, Emergent Technologies and Tools. ViNOrg 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31800-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31800-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31799-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31800-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics