Abstract
The rigor and relevance of the results is central to the process of scientific investigation, even in areas where the practice prevails, as is the case of the scientific area of information systems and technology. This issue is also particularly relevant when the underlying epistemological orientation is the interpretivism. Based on a literature review focused on interpretive research in the field of information systems and technology, we find that the generalization of research resulting under the interpretive paradigm are valid and are not exclusive to the positivist orientation. This paper explores the importance of interpretative research in the information systems and technology field. As a result we discuss the different perspectives around the generalization and its interpretation in an interpretative research, supporting the investigator in the grounds of validation of their results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Björk, B. C.: A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. disponível em (2006), http://informationr.net/ir/
Marconi, M., Lakatos, E.: Metodologia Científica, São Paulo, Atlas (2000)
Carvalho, J.A.: Metodologias de Investigação em Engenharia. Apontamentos da unidade curricular, do Programa Doutoral em Tecnologias e Sistemas de Informação, Universidade do Minho – Departamento de Sistemas de Informação (2009)
Blaikie, N.: Designing Social Research. Polity Press, Cambridge (2000)
Vasconcellos, M.J.E.: Pensamento Sistémico: o Novo Paradigma da Ciência, 7a edn. Papirus Editora, São Paulo (2008)
Lee, A., Baskerville, R.: Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 14(3), 221–243 (2003)
Kumar, R.: Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage, London (1999)
Feibleman, J.: Pure Science, Applied Science, and Technology: an Attempt at Definitions. In: Mitcham, C., Mackey, R. (eds.) Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, pp. 33–41. The Free Press, NY (1983)
Skolimowski, H.: The Structure of Thinking in Technology. In: Mitcham, C., Mackey, R. (eds.) Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, pp. 42–49. The Free Press, NY (1983, 1966)
March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information tecnology. Elsevier Science 15, 251–266 (1995)
Lee, A.S.: Editorial, /W/SQuarter/y (25:1), pp. iii–vii (2001)
Baskerville, R., Myers, M.: Information Systems as a Reference Discipline. MIS Quarterly 26(1), 1–14 (2002)
Hiershheim, R., Klein, H.: Four Paradigm of Information Systems Development. Communication of the ACM 32(10), 1199–1216 (1989)
Avison, D., et al.: Reflection on information systems practice, education and a research: 10 years of the Information Systems Journal. Info Systems Journal 11, 3–22 (2001)
Avison, D., et al.: The beginnings of a new era: time to reflect on 17 years of the ISJ. Info Systems Journal 18, 5–21 (2008)
McLean, E.R.: Information Systems and Its Underlying Disciplines: a Summary of the Papers. Data Base Fall, pp. 3–6 (1982)
Santos, B.S.: Um discurso sobre as ciências. Edições Afrontamento, Porto (1985)
Walsham, G.: The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research. The management School. University of Lancaster. Lancaster LA1 4YX, UK (2001)
Benbasat, I., Weber, R.: Research Commentary: Rethinking “Diversit:y” in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 7(4), 389–399 (1996)
Swanson, E.B., Ramiller, N.C.: Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to A New Journal, 1987-1992. Information Systems Research 4(4), 299–330 (1993)
Checkland, P., Holwell, S.: Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. Wiley, Chichester (1998)
Davis, G.: Information Systems Conceptual Foundations: Looking Backward and Forward. In: Baskerville, R., Stage, J., DeGross, J. (eds.) Qrganizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, pp. 61–82. Kluwer, Boston (2000)
Bacon, C.J., Fitzgerald, B.: A Systemic Framework for the Fiel of Information Systems. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 32(2), 46–67 (2001)
Klein, H.K., Myers, M.: A set of Principles for Conduting and Evaluating Interpretative Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–97 (1999)
Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 320–330 (2006)
Capra, F.: O Ponto de Mutação: A Ciência, a Sociedade e a Cultura Emergente, 25th edn. Cultrix, São Paulo (1982)
Vasconcellos, M.J.E.: Pensamento Sistémico: o Novo Paradigma da Ciência, 7a edn. Papirus Editora, São Paulo (2008)
Kaplan, B., Maxwell, J.A.: Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems. In: Anderson, J.G., Aydin, C.E., Jay, S.J. (eds.) Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications, pp. 45–68. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Department of Management Science, The Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, UK (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ferreira, I., Ferreira, S., Ramos, I. (2012). The Relevance of Results in Interpretive Research in Information Systems and Technology. In: Putnik, G.D., Cruz-Cunha, M.M. (eds) Virtual and Networked Organizations, Emergent Technologies and Tools. ViNOrg 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31800-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31800-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31799-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31800-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)