Abstract
Document clustering refers to unsupervised classification (categorization) of documents into groups (clusters) in such a way that the documents in a cluster are similar, whereas dissimilar documents are assigned in different clusters. The documents may be web pages, blog posts, news articles, or other text files. A popular and computationally efficient clustering technique is flat clustering. Unlike hierarchical techniques, flat clustering algorithms aim to partition the document space into groups of similar documents. The cluster assignments however may be hard or soft. This paper presents our experimental work on evaluating some hard and soft flat-clustering algorithms, namely K-means, heuristic k-means and fuzzy C-means, for categorizing text documents. We experimented with different representations (tf, tf.idf, Boolean) and feature selection schemes (with or without stop word removal and with or without stemming) on some standard datasets. The results indicate that tf.idf representation and the use of stemming obtains better clustering. Moreover, fuzzy clustering obtains better results than K-means on almost all datasets, and is also a more stable method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jain, A.K., Murty, M.N., Flynn, P.J.: Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv. 31(31) 477–488 (1995)
Jain, A.K.: 50 years beyond K-means. In: 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Tampa, FL (2008)
Jain, A.K., Dubes, R.C.: Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice-Hall Advanced Reference Series, Prentice Hall, NJ (1988)
Manning, C.D., Raghvan, P., Schutze, H.: Introduction to Information Retrieval, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2th edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2000)
Valente De Oliviera, J., Pedrycz, W.: Advances in Fuzzy Clustering and its Applications, pp. 3–30. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)
Bezdek, J.C.: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. Plenum Press, New York (1981)
Alag, S.: Collective Intelligence in Action. Manning, New York (2009)
Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for evaluation of clustering methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 36(31), pp. 846–850 (1971)
Bjorner, L., Aone, C,: Fast and Effective Text Mining Using Liner time Document Clustering. In: Knowledge and Data Discovery’ 1999, California. (1999)
Van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval. 2nd edn, Butterworths, London (1979)
Lewis, D., Reuters-21578. http://www.research.att.com/lewis/reuters21578.html. Accessed Jan 2011
Classic 4 (7095). ftp://ftp.cs.cornell.edu/pub/smart. Accessed Jan 2011
Newsgroups. http://www.ai.mit.edu/prople/jrennie/20-newsgroups. Accessed Jan 2011
Porter, M.F.: An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Program 14(3), 130–137 (1980)
Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: A comparison of document clustering techniques. In: KDD Workshop on Text Mining (2002)
Xiong, H., Wu, J., Chen, J.: K-means clustering versus validation measures—a data distribution perspective. In: KDD’06, ACM Press (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singh, V.K., Siddiqui, T.J., Singh, M.K. (2013). Evaluating Hard and Soft Flat-Clustering Algorithms for Text Documents. In: Kudělka, M., Pokorný, J., Snášel, V., Abraham, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI 2011), Prague, Czech Republic, August, 2011. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 179. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31603-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31603-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31602-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31603-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)