Skip to main content

On the Logical Foundations of Moral Agency

  • Conference paper
Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7393))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this work is to provide a logical analysis of moral agency. Although this concept has been extensively studied in social philosophy and in social sciences, it has been far less studied in the field of deontic logic and multi-agent systems (MASs). We discuss different aspects of moral agency such as the distinction between desires and moral values and the concept of moral agent. All these concepts are formalized in a variant of STIT logic with explicit actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alger, I., Weibull, J.W.: Homo moralis: preference evolution under incomplete information and assortative matching. Technical report, Toulouse School of Economics, TSE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R.J., Dreze, J.H.: Rational expectations in games. American Economic Review 98(1), 72–86 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Battigalli, P., Dufwenberg, M.: Guilt in games. The American Economic Review 97(2), 170–176 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., Xu, M.: Facing the future: agents and choices in our indeterminist world. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broersen, J.: A Logical Analysis of the Interaction between ‘Obligation-to-do’ and ‘Knowingly Doing’. In: van der Meyden, R., van der Torre, L. (eds.) DEON 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5076, pp. 140–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., van der Torre, L.: Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(3-4), 428–447 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: Theories of fairness and reciprocity: Evidence and economic applications. In: Advances in Economics and Econometrics. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., Fehr, E. (eds.): Moral sentiments and material interests. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: BIO logical agents: Norms, beliefs, intentions in defeasible logic. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems 17(1), 36–69 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haidt, J.: The moral emotions. In: Davidson, R.J., Scherer, K.R., Goldsmith, H.H. (eds.) Handbook of Affective Sciences, pp. 852–870. Oxford University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harsanyi, J.: Morality and the theory of rational behaviour. In: Sen, A.K., Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herzig, A., Lorini, E.: A dynamic logic of agency I: STIT, abilities and powers. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19(1), 89–121 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Horty, J.F.: Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, F.: Changing for the better: Preference dynamics and agent diversity. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reiter, R.: Knowledge in action: logical foundations for specifying and implementing dynamical systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Roy, O.: Epistemic logic and the foundations of decision and game theory. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 27(2), 283–314 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Searle, J.: Rationality in Action. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sen, A.K.: Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, 317–344 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomason, R.: Combinations of tense and modality. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: a modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zanardo, A.: Branching-time logic with quantification over branches: The point of view of modal logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 61(1), 143–166 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lorini, E. (2012). On the Logical Foundations of Moral Agency. In: Ågotnes, T., Broersen, J., Elgesem, D. (eds) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. DEON 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31569-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31570-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics