Abstract
This chapter reports about the software process guidance in ontology-driven software development (ODSD), one of the core ontology-enabled services of the ODSD environments. Ontology-driven software process guidance amounts to a significant step forward in software engineering in general (cf. Fig. 1.1 on p. 3). Its role is to guide developers through a complex software development process by providing information about the consistency of artefacts and about the tasks to be accomplished to reach a particular development goal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For the purpose of the integrated DSL+OWL modelling approach, BOC developed a prototypical graphical syntax for OWL2 in the ADOxx Platform, based on the abstract metamodel of the OWL2 Manchester syntax.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Artefacts and Artefact Links will from now on be called DEFT Artefacts and DEFT Artefact Links in order to avoid confusion with the guidance ontology concept Artefact.
References
A. Bartho, Creating and maintaining tutorials with DEFT. in Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC’09), May 2009, pp. 309–310
T. Hall, S. Beecham, A. Rainer, Requirements problems in twelve software companies: An empirical analysis. IEE Proc. Software 149(5), 153–160 (2002)
B. Henderson-Sellers, C. Gonzalez-Perez, A comparison of four process metamodels and the creation of a new generic standard. Inform. Software Tech. 47(1), 49–65 (2005)
B. Motik, B.C. Grau, I. Horrocks, Z. Wu, A. Fokoue, C. Lutz, Owl 2 web ontology language profiles. W3C Recommendation, 27 October 2009. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/
K. Nørmark, Elucidative programming. Nord. J. Comput. 7(2):87–105 (2000)
OMG. Software Process Engineering Metamodel (spem) Specification—Version 2.0 Object Management Group, 2008. http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/08-04-01.pdf
Y. Ren, J.Z. Pan, Y. Zhao, Soundness preserving approximation for TBox reasoning, in Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference Conference (AAAI2010), 2010
S. Si-Said, C. Rolland, Formalising guidance for the crews goal-scenario approach to requirements engineering, in 8th European-Japanese Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, 1998, pp. 172–190
A. van Lamsweerde, Reasoning about alternative requirements options, in Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications, ed. by A. Borgida, V.K. Chaudhri, P. Giorgini, E.S.K. Yu Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5600 (Springer, Berlin, 2009), pp. 380–397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aßmann, U. et al. (2013). Ontology-Guided Software Engineering in the MOST Workbench. In: Pan, J., Staab, S., Aßmann, U., Ebert, J., Zhao, Y. (eds) Ontology-Driven Software Development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31226-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31226-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31225-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31226-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)