Skip to main content

Psychological Evidence of Mental Segmentation in Table Reading

  • Conference paper
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7352))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

How we organize elements when reading a table was examined in a psychological experiment using a modified spatial-cuing paradigm. Table-like stimuli consisting of 16 square elements arranged in a four-by-four matrix form were used. Participants were instructed to discriminate whether the presented stimuli could be read as containing either one element or two elements in accordance with the induced reading direction. The results showed that when two elements were presented along with the induced direction, it was easier to read as such than when two elements were presented orthogonal to the induced direction. Although there was no contour line in the stimuli, participants were able to mentally segment and organize them into global units lying in the particular direction, which was instrumental to reading the tables efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cleveland, W.S., McGill, R.: An experiment in graphical perception. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 25(5), 491–500 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spence, I.: Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16(4), 683–692 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gattis, M., Holyoak, K.J.: Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22(1), 231–239 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pinker, S.: A theory of graph comprehension. In: Aritificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing, pp. 73–126. L. Erlbaum Associates (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter, P., Shah, P.: A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 4(2), 75–100 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peebles, D., Cheng, P.C.: Modeling the effect of task and graphical representation on response latency in a graph reading task. Human Factors 45(1), 28–46 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Egly, R., Driver, J., Rafal, R.D.: Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123(3), 161–177 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roelfsema, P.R., Lamme, V.A.F., Spekreijse, H.: The implementation of visual routines. Vision Research 40, 1385–1411 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roelfsema, P.R.: Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience 29, 203–227 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ullman, S.: Visual routines. Cognition 18, 97–159 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duncan, J.: Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(4), 501–517 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kramer, A.F., Jacobson, A.: Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics 50(3), 267–284 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tufte, E.R.: Envisioning information. Graphics Press, Cheshire (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cleveland, W.S.: The Elements of Graphing Data. Hobart Press, Summit (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kosslyn, S.M.: Elements of Graph Design. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brainard, D.H.: The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10(4), 433–436 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Masson, M.E.J., Loftus, G.R.: Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57(3), 202–220 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jansen, A.R., Marriott, K., Yelland, G.W.: Comprehension of algebraic expressions by experienced users of mathematics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 56A(1), 3–30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sugio, T., Shimojima, A., Katagiri, Y. (2012). Psychological Evidence of Mental Segmentation in Table Reading. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7352. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31222-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31223-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics