Learning Objectives
This chapter is to help students understand:
-
1.
Basic objectives of the provisions on enforcing protection of intellectual property rights under TRIPs;
-
2.
Civil and administrative measures required to be available in respect of any activity infringing intellectual property rights covered in TRIPs;
-
3.
Provisional measures to permit effective action against infringements and to include expeditious remedies under TRIPs;
-
4.
Necessity to enforce the border measures for the proper protection of intellectual property rights;
-
5.
Criminal procedures applied in cases of willful trade mark counterfeiting or copyright piracy on a commercial scale.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbott FM (1996) The new global technology regime: the WTO TRIPs agreement and global economic development. Chicago-Kent Law Rev 72
Abbott FM (1997) WTO dispute settlement and the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights, in international trade law and the GATT-WTO dispute settlement system. Kluwer Law International
Abbott FM (1997) The future of the multilateral trading system in the context of TRIPS. Hastings Int’l Comp Law Rev 20
Abbott FM (1998) The enduring enigma of TRIPs: a challenge for the world economic system. J Int’l Econ Law
Aberto C (1989) The economics of intellectual property rights and the GATT: a view from the south. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22
Anawalt HC (2003) International intellectual property, progress, and the rule of law. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech Law J 19
Bhala R, Gantz DA (2003) Intellectual property and trademarks rights. Arizona J Int’l Comp Law 20
Braga CAP (1995) Trade-related intellectual property issue: the Uruguay round agreement and its economic implications, in the Uruguay round and the developing countries
Braga CAP and Fink C (1998) The relationship between intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Duke J Comp & Int’l Law 9
Cahn S, Schimmel D (1997) The cultural exception: does it exist in GATT and GATS frameworks? how does it affect or is it affected by the agreement on TRIPs? Cardozo Arts & Ent Law J 15
Correa CM (2002) Public health and international laws: unfair competition under the TRIPs greement: protection of data submitted for the registration of pharmaceuticals. Chicago J Int’l Law
Croome J (1995) Reshaping the world trading system: a history of the Uruguay round. The World Trade Organization, Geneva, p. 130
Curci FX (2002) Symposium: transnational business law in the twenty-first century: protecting your intellectual property rights overseas. Transnat’l Law 15
Divney JA, Connell GJ (1994) Intellectual property provisions of the GATT. University of Colorado Law Rev 23
Doane ML (1994) TRIPS and international intellectual property protection in an age of advancing technology. American University J Int’l Law & Policy 9
Drahos P, Braithwaite J (2002) Proceedings of the 2002 conference access to medicines in the developing world: international facilitation or hindrance? Wisconsin Int’l Law J 20
Dreier T (1996) TRIPS and the enforcement of intellectual property rights, in from GATT to TRIPS-the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. In: Beier F-K and Schricker G (eds.) John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Dreyfuss RC, Lowenfeld AF (1997) Two achievement of the Uruguay round: putting TRIPs and dispute settlement together. Virginia J Int’l Law 37
Farkas LP (1996) Trade-related aspects of intellectual property, in world trade organization, the multilateral framework for the 21st century and U.S. implementing legislation. In: Stewart TP (ed) ABA Section of International Law and Practice
Folsom RH et al. (1995) International business transactions, Sweet & Maxwell
Fried JT (1994) Two paradigms for the rule of international trade las. United States Law J 39
Gana R (1996) Prospects for developing countries under the TRIPs agreement. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29
Garcia G (2000) Economic development and the course of intellectual property protection in Mexico. Int’l Law J 27
Geller PE (1995) Intellectual property in the global marketplace: impact of TRIPs dispute settlement? Int’l Law 29
Hill E (1990) U.S. addresses contentious issues in negotiation on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Business America 18
Hoekman B, Kosteck M (1995) The political economy of the world trading system: from GATT to WTO. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Holwick S (1999) Trade and the environment: developing nations and the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Colorado J Int’l: Environ Law & Policy
Karjala D, Sugiyama K (1988) Fundamental concept of Japanese and American copyright law. America J Comp Law 36
Kastenmeier RW, Beier D (1989) International trade and intellectual property: promise, risks and reality. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22
Kennedy KC (1998)The GATT-WTO system at fifty. Wisconsin Int’l Law J 16
Land JN (2004) Intellectual property protection as viewed through the European community’s treatment of geographical indications: what lessons can TRIPs learn? Cardozo J Int’l & Comp Law 11
Lehmann M (1985) The theory of property rights and the protection of rev. Indus. Property & Copyright Law
Mangassarian E (2001) Technological trends and the changing face of international intellectual property law. Int’l Legal Perspectives 11
Maskus KE, Denubarti M (1995) How trade-related are intellectual property rights? J Int’l Econ 39
Ugolini MA (1999) Gray-market goods under the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Transnat’l Law 12
O’Sullivan MJ (2000) International copyright: protection for copyright holders in the Internet age. N.Y. Int’l Law Rev 13
Oman R (1994) Intellectual property after the Uruguay round. J Copyright Soc U.S.A. 42
Otten A, Wager H (1996) Compliance with TRIPs: the emerging world view. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29
Pechman RJ (1998) Seeking multilateral protection for intellectual property: the United States “TRIPs” over special Global Trade 7, p. 301
Preeg EH (1995) Trades in a brave new world; the Uruguay round and the future of the international trading system. International trade regulation. University of Chicago Press
Reed C (2012) Computer law, 7th edn. Universal Law Publishing Co.
Reichman JH (1989) Intellectual property in international trade: opportunities and risks of a GATT connection. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22
Reichman JH (1993) The TRIPS component of the GATT’s Uruguay round; competitive prospects for intellectual property owners in an integrated world market. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media Ent Law J 4
Reichman JH (1995) Universal minimum standards of intellectual property protection under the TRIPS component of the WTO agreement. Int’l Law 29
Reichman JH (1996) Compliance with the TRIPs agreement: introduction to scholorly debate. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29
Reichman JH (1997) Symposium: intellectual property law in the international marketplace: trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Virginia J Int’l Law 37
Reichman JH (2000) The TRIPs agreement comes of age: conflict or cooperation with the developing countries? Int’l Law 32
Romano F (1998) Global trademark and copyright 1998: protecting intellectual property rights in the international marketplace. International Conventions and Treaties
Schaffter R, Earle B, Agusti F (2002) International business law and its environment. Thomson/Western
Sell SK (2002) Industry strategies for intellectual property and trade: the quest for TRIPs, and post-TRIPs strategies. Cardozo J Int’l Comp Law 10
Simon E (1994) The integration of intellectual property and trade policy. ALAI
Su E (2000) The winners and the losers: the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights and its effects on developing countries. J Int’l Law 23
Ullrich H (1995) TRIPS; adequate protection, inadequate trade, adequate competition policy. Pacific Rim Law & Policy J 4
Williamson D (1989) Addressing inadequate intellectual property protection in the Uruguay round. Business America 4
Young MK (1996) Dispute resolution in the Uruguay round: lawyers triumph over diplomats. Int’l Law 29
Yu PK (2002) Symposium: world trade intellectual property and the global elites: international lawmaking in the new millennium: an introduction. Int’l & Comp Law 10
Appellate Body Report, United States-Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, WT/DS176/AB/R, (Jan. 2, 2002)
Panel Report, United States-Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, WT/DS176/R, (Aug. 6, 2001)
Universal Copyright Convention, Sept. 6, 1952, 6 U.S.T. 2731, 216 U.N.T.S. 134, revised by 25 U.S.T. 1341, 943 U.N.T.S. 178, July 24, 1971.
WTO, Agreement on Trade – Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, April 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex C, Legal Instruments-Results of the Uruguay Round, Vol. 33, I.L.M. (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, E.S. (2012). Enforcement. In: World Trade Regulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31143-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31143-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31142-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31143-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)