Skip to main content

Enforcement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
World Trade Regulation
  • 1211 Accesses

Learning Objectives

This chapter is to help students understand:

  1. 1.

    Basic objectives of the provisions on enforcing protection of intellectual property rights under TRIPs;

  2. 2.

    Civil and administrative measures required to be available in respect of any activity infringing intellectual property rights covered in TRIPs;

  3. 3.

    Provisional measures to permit effective action against infringements and to include expeditious remedies under TRIPs;

  4. 4.

    Necessity to enforce the border measures for the proper protection of intellectual property rights;

  5. 5.

    Criminal procedures applied in cases of willful trade mark counterfeiting or copyright piracy on a commercial scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott FM (1996) The new global technology regime: the WTO TRIPs agreement and global economic development. Chicago-Kent Law Rev 72

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott FM (1997) WTO dispute settlement and the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights, in international trade law and the GATT-WTO dispute settlement system. Kluwer Law International

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott FM (1997) The future of the multilateral trading system in the context of TRIPS. Hastings Int’l Comp Law Rev 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott FM (1998) The enduring enigma of TRIPs: a challenge for the world economic system. J Int’l Econ Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Aberto C (1989) The economics of intellectual property rights and the GATT: a view from the south. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Anawalt HC (2003) International intellectual property, progress, and the rule of law. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech Law J 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhala R, Gantz DA (2003) Intellectual property and trademarks rights. Arizona J Int’l Comp Law 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga CAP (1995) Trade-related intellectual property issue: the Uruguay round agreement and its economic implications, in the Uruguay round and the developing countries

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga CAP and Fink C (1998) The relationship between intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Duke J Comp & Int’l Law 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn S, Schimmel D (1997) The cultural exception: does it exist in GATT and GATS frameworks? how does it affect or is it affected by the agreement on TRIPs? Cardozo Arts & Ent Law J 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa CM (2002) Public health and international laws: unfair competition under the TRIPs greement: protection of data submitted for the registration of pharmaceuticals. Chicago J Int’l Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Croome J (1995) Reshaping the world trading system: a history of the Uruguay round. The World Trade Organization, Geneva, p. 130

    Google Scholar 

  • Curci FX (2002) Symposium: transnational business law in the twenty-first century: protecting your intellectual property rights overseas. Transnat’l Law 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Divney JA, Connell GJ (1994) Intellectual property provisions of the GATT. University of Colorado Law Rev 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane ML (1994) TRIPS and international intellectual property protection in an age of advancing technology. American University J Int’l Law & Policy 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahos P, Braithwaite J (2002) Proceedings of the 2002 conference access to medicines in the developing world: international facilitation or hindrance? Wisconsin Int’l Law J 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier T (1996) TRIPS and the enforcement of intellectual property rights, in from GATT to TRIPS-the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. In: Beier F-K and Schricker G (eds.) John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfuss RC, Lowenfeld AF (1997) Two achievement of the Uruguay round: putting TRIPs and dispute settlement together. Virginia J Int’l Law 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas LP (1996) Trade-related aspects of intellectual property, in world trade organization, the multilateral framework for the 21st century and U.S. implementing legislation. In: Stewart TP (ed) ABA Section of International Law and Practice

    Google Scholar 

  • Folsom RH et al. (1995) International business transactions, Sweet & Maxwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried JT (1994) Two paradigms for the rule of international trade las. United States Law J 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Gana R (1996) Prospects for developing countries under the TRIPs agreement. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia G (2000) Economic development and the course of intellectual property protection in Mexico. Int’l Law J 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller PE (1995) Intellectual property in the global marketplace: impact of TRIPs dispute settlement? Int’l Law 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill E (1990) U.S. addresses contentious issues in negotiation on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Business America 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman B, Kosteck M (1995) The political economy of the world trading system: from GATT to WTO. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Holwick S (1999) Trade and the environment: developing nations and the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Colorado J Int’l: Environ Law & Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Karjala D, Sugiyama K (1988) Fundamental concept of Japanese and American copyright law. America J Comp Law 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastenmeier RW, Beier D (1989) International trade and intellectual property: promise, risks and reality. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy KC (1998)The GATT-WTO system at fifty. Wisconsin Int’l Law J 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Land JN (2004) Intellectual property protection as viewed through the European community’s treatment of geographical indications: what lessons can TRIPs learn? Cardozo J Int’l & Comp Law 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann M (1985) The theory of property rights and the protection of rev. Indus. Property & Copyright Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangassarian E (2001) Technological trends and the changing face of international intellectual property law. Int’l Legal Perspectives 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskus KE, Denubarti M (1995) How trade-related are intellectual property rights? J Int’l Econ 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugolini MA (1999) Gray-market goods under the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Transnat’l Law 12

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan MJ (2000) International copyright: protection for copyright holders in the Internet age. N.Y. Int’l Law Rev 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Oman R (1994) Intellectual property after the Uruguay round. J Copyright Soc U.S.A. 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten A, Wager H (1996) Compliance with TRIPs: the emerging world view. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechman RJ (1998) Seeking multilateral protection for intellectual property: the United States “TRIPs” over special Global Trade 7, p. 301

    Google Scholar 

  • Preeg EH (1995) Trades in a brave new world; the Uruguay round and the future of the international trading system. International trade regulation. University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed C (2012) Computer law, 7th edn. Universal Law Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman JH (1989) Intellectual property in international trade: opportunities and risks of a GATT connection. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman JH (1993) The TRIPS component of the GATT’s Uruguay round; competitive prospects for intellectual property owners in an integrated world market. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media Ent Law J 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman JH (1995) Universal minimum standards of intellectual property protection under the TRIPS component of the WTO agreement. Int’l Law 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman JH (1996) Compliance with the TRIPs agreement: introduction to scholorly debate. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman JH (1997) Symposium: intellectual property law in the international marketplace: trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Virginia J Int’l Law 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman JH (2000) The TRIPs agreement comes of age: conflict or cooperation with the developing countries? Int’l Law 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano F (1998) Global trademark and copyright 1998: protecting intellectual property rights in the international marketplace. International Conventions and Treaties

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffter R, Earle B, Agusti F (2002) International business law and its environment. Thomson/Western

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell SK (2002) Industry strategies for intellectual property and trade: the quest for TRIPs, and post-TRIPs strategies. Cardozo J Int’l Comp Law 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon E (1994) The integration of intellectual property and trade policy. ALAI

    Google Scholar 

  • Su E (2000) The winners and the losers: the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights and its effects on developing countries. J Int’l Law 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich H (1995) TRIPS; adequate protection, inadequate trade, adequate competition policy. Pacific Rim Law & Policy J 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson D (1989) Addressing inadequate intellectual property protection in the Uruguay round. Business America 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Young MK (1996) Dispute resolution in the Uruguay round: lawyers triumph over diplomats. Int’l Law 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu PK (2002) Symposium: world trade intellectual property and the global elites: international lawmaking in the new millennium: an introduction. Int’l & Comp Law 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Appellate Body Report, United States-Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, WT/DS176/AB/R, (Jan. 2, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Panel Report, United States-Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, WT/DS176/R, (Aug. 6, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Universal Copyright Convention, Sept. 6, 1952, 6 U.S.T. 2731, 216 U.N.T.S. 134, revised by 25 U.S.T. 1341, 943 U.N.T.S. 178, July 24, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, Agreement on Trade – Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, April 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex C, Legal Instruments-Results of the Uruguay Round, Vol. 33, I.L.M. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Sup Lee .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, E.S. (2012). Enforcement. In: World Trade Regulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31143-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31143-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31142-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31143-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics