Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 172))

  • 2500 Accesses

Abstract

The last few years have seen an enormous growth of interest in e-portfolios and the benefits they can bring to learners. While it is generally agreed that e-portfolios have great potential to engage students and promote deep learning, the research that has been conducted to date focuses very little on student perceptions of value of the e-portfolio for their learning. If students do not agree or wish to use the e-portfolio as an integral part of their educational experience, then the potential impact the e-portfolio have on learning will not be realised. This paper describes the development of an e portfolio system to promote reflective skills for engineering students in a university in Malaysia. The Activity Theory is used as a lens to explain the reasons for the failed adoption of the e portfolio system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The Council For Industry and Higher Education, Helping Students Towards Success at Work - An Intent being Fulfilled (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mason, G., Williams, G., Cranmer, S.: Employability skills initiatives in higher education: what effects do they have on graduate labour market outcomes? Education Economics 17(1), 1–30 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N.C. of I. into Gran Bretaña, H.E., Dearing, R., Barnett, R.: Higher education in the learning society. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burgess, R.: Measuring and recording student achievement. Universities UK/SCOP (2004), http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/learningandteaching/DecemberNewsletter.pdf (abgerufen am 3.6.2006)

  5. East, R.: A progress report on progress files. Active Learning in Higher Education 6(2), 160–171 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halstead, A., Sutherland, S.: ePortfolio: A means of enhancing employability and the professional development of engineers. In: International Conference on Innovation, Good Practice and Research in Engineering Education (EE 2006), Liverpool (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Loughran, J., Corrigan, D.: Teaching portfolios: A strategy for developing learning and teaching in preservice education. Teaching and Teacher Education 11(6), 565–577 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wade, R.C., Yarbrough, D.B.: Portfolios: A tool for reflective thinking in teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education 12(1), 63–79 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klenowski, V., Askew, S., Carnell, E.: Portfolios for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31(3), 267–286 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abrami, P., Barrett, H.: Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de l’Apprentissage et de la Technologie 31(3) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, K., Tillema, H.: Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28(6), 625–648 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R.A. CRA: PDP and e-Portfolio UK Newsletter (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barrett, H., Knezek, D.: E-Portfolios: Issues in Assessment. Accountability and Preservice Teacher Preparation (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barrett, H.C.: Differentiating electronic portfolios and online assessment management systems. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cotterill, S., McDonald, T., Drummond, P., Hammond, G.: Design, implementation and evaluation of a’generic’ePortfolio: the University of Newcastle upon Tyne experience. CAL-laborate (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Balaban, I., Bubas, G.: Educational potentials of ePortfolio systems: Student evaluations of Mahara and Elgg. In: 2010 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (ITI), pp. 329–336 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Love, D., McKean, G., Gathercoal, P.: Portfolios to Webfolios and beyond: Levels of Maturation. Educause Quarterly 27(2), 14 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Butler, P.: A review of the literature on portfolios and electronic portfolios. Techreport, pp. 1–23 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vygotsky, L.: Mind in society (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nardi, B.A.: Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. The MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuutti, K.: Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 17–44 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Engeström, Y.: Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kaptelinin, V.: Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction. In: Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 103–116 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boer, N.I., van Baalen, P.J., Kumar, K.: An activity theory approach for studying the situatedness of knowledge sharing. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2002, pp. 1483–1492 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Engeström, Y., et al.: Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on Activity Theory, 19–38 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chesbrough, H., Spohrer, J.: A research manifesto for services science. Communications of the ACM 49(7), 35–40 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.P., Bailey, J., Gruhl, D.: Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer 40(1), 71–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Spohrer, J., Anderson, L., Pass, N., Ager, T.: Service science and service dominant logic. Otago Forum 2, 4–18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 1–17 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wardah Zainal Abidin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abidin, W.Z., Uden, L., Alias, R.A. (2013). Investigation into a University Electronic Portfolio System Using Activity Theory. In: Uden, L., Herrera, F., Bajo Pérez, J., Corchado Rodríguez, J. (eds) 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations: Service and Cloud Computing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 172. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30867-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30867-3_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30866-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30867-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics