Abstract
Logistics systems have to cope with different challenges like unforeseeable machine failures leading to an increase of dynamics and complexity. Accordingly, a system’s robustness (i.e. the ability to resist against a number of endangering environmental influences and the ability to restore its operational reliability after being damaged) might be decreased. Thus, this paper aims to answer the following research question: How do selected exemplarily heuristics (Minimum Queue-length Estimation, Minimum Cumulative Processing, Simple Rule-based, Holonic, Ant Pheromone, and Neural Net) contribute to a real world Hamburg Harbour Car Terminal’s robustness? Thereby, the research focus in this investigation is on throughput time. As a main result it could be shown that all selected heuristics could contribute to a positive development of the system’s robustness in case of machine failures. Thus, from a practical view potentials for the improvement of real-world scenarios might be assumed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For this baseline simulation accuracy (docking) test and application of the NN model, we ignore all parking waiting times except parking queues directly affecting the car-flows through specific treatment stations, since none of the heuristics involve any parking waits before cars get to DP1.
- 2.
The Design Option ‘Neural Net’ is selected, since it is the first CALS design option of a bunch of consecutive design options, that require all the preceding design options [7].
- 3.
For an overview of further design options of CALS beside the Neural Net see [7].
References
Klibi, W., Martel, A., Guitouni, A.: The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203(2), 283–293 (2010)
Kouvelis, C., Yu, G.: Robust Discrete Optimization and its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Berlin (1997)
Snyder, L., Daskin, M.: A random-key genetic algorithm for the generalized traveling salesman problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174(1), 38–53 (2006)
Barrionuevo, A., Deutsch, C.: A distribution system brought to its knees. New York Times, Sept 1, (2005)
Mouawad, J.: Katrina’s shock to the system. The New York Times, Sept 4, (2005)
Wycisk, C., McKelvey, B., Hülsmann, M.: Smart parts’ supply networks as complex adaptive systems—analysis and implications. Int. J. Phys. Distribution Logis. Manage. 38(2), 108–125 (2008)
McKelvey, B., Wycisk, C., Hülsmann, M.: Designing an electronic auction market for complex ‘smart parts’ logistics: Options based on LeBaron’s computational stock market. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 120(2), 476–494 (2009)
Klaus, P., Kille, C.: Die Top 100 der Logistik—Marktgrößen. Marktsegmente und Marktführer in der Logistik—Dienstleistungswirtschaft, Hamburg (2006)
Mason, R.B.: The external environment’s effect on management and strategy- a complexity theory approach. Manag. Decis. 45(1), 10–28 (2007)
Sydow, J.: Zum Management von Logistiknetzwerken. Logistik Manage. 4(4), (2002)
Meepetchdee, Y., Shah, N.: Logistical network design with robustness and complexity considerations. Int. J. Phys. Distribution Logis. Manage. 37(3), 201–222 (2007)
Hülsmann, M., Cordes, P.: Autonomous co-operation and control in complex adaptive logistic systems—contribution and limitations for the innovation capability of international supply networks. In: Zhou, J. (eds.): COMPLEX 2009, Part I, LNICST 4—Proceedings of the First International Conference on Complex Sciences: Theory and Application. Springer, Berlin, pp. 1023–1032 (2009)
Hülsmann, M., Scholz-Reiter, B., Austerschulte, L., de Beer, C., Grapp, J.: Autonomous cooperation—a capable way to cope with external risiks in international supply networks? In: Pawar, K.S., Lalwani, C.S., de Carvalho, J.C., Muffatto, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Logistics (12th ISL), Loughborough, pp. 172–178 (2007)
Windt, K., Hülsmann, M.: Perspectives on initial ideas and conceptual components of autonomous co-operation and control. In: Hülsmann, M., Windt, K. (eds.) Understanding Autonomous Cooperation and Control: The Impact of Autonomy on Management, Information, Communication, and Material Flow, Berlin (2007)
Hülsmann, M., Windt, K.: Development of a terminological system of autonomous cooperation, in: Hülsmann, M., Windt, K. (eds.) Understanding Autonomous Co-operation—The Impact of Autonomy on Management, Information, Communication and Material Flow, Bremen (2006)
Hülsmann, M., Scholz-Reiter, B., deBeer, C., Austerschulte, L.: Effects of autonomous cooperation on the robustness of international supply networks—contributions and limitations for the management of external dynamics in complex systems. In: Haasis, H.-D., Kreowski, H.-J., Scholz-Reiter, B. (eds.) Dynamics in Logistics—Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Dynamics in Logistics. Springer, Berlin, pp. 241–250 (2008)
Hülsmann, M., Korsmeier, B., Illigen, C., Cordes, P.: autonomous co-operation of “smart-parts”–contributions and limitations to the robustness of complex adaptive logistics systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Dynamics in Logistics (LDIC), Universität Bremen, Bremen (2009)
Windt, K., Becker, T., Kolev, I.: 2010. A comparison of the logistics performance of autonomous control methods in production logistics. In: Sihn, W., Kuhlang, P. (eds.) Sustainable Production and Logistics in Global Networks. Proceedings of the 43rd CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Vienna, pp. 576–583 (2010)
Windt, K., Becker, T., Jeken, O., Gelessus, A.: A Classification Pattern for Autonomous Control Methods in Logistics. CRC, University of Bremen, Bremen (2010)
Chopra, S., Sodhi, M.S.: Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 46, 52–61 (2004)
Helferich, O.K., Cook, R.L.: Securing the Supply Chain. Council of Logistics Management (CLM) (2002)
Sheffi, Y.: The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. MIT Press Books, Cambridge (2005)
Sweet, K.: China earthquake hits home for US companies. Fox Business, May 12 (2008)
Christopher, M., Peck, H.: 2004. Building the resilient supply chain. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 15(2), 1–13 (2004)
Tang, C.: Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Int. J. Logis. Res. Appl. 9, 33–45 (2006)
Kleindorfer, P.R., Saad, G.H.: Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manage. 14(1), 53–68 (2005)
Philipp, T., de Beer, C., Windt, K., Scholz-Reiter, B.: Evaluation of autonomous logistic processes—Analysis of the influence of structural complexity. In: Hülsmann, M., Windt, K. (eds.), Understanding Autonomous Cooperation and Control in Logistics—The Impact on Management, Information and Communication and Material Flow. Springer, Berlin, pp. 303–324 (2007)
Scholz-Reiter, B., Freitag, M., de Beer, C., Jagalski, T.: The influence of production networks’ complexity on the performance of autonomous control methods. In: Teti, R. (ed.): Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering 5. Proceedings of the 5th CIRP International Seminar on Computation in Manufacturing Engineering (CIRP ICME ‘06), Naples, 317–320 (2006)
Armbruster, D., de Beer, C., Freitag, M., Jagalski, T., Ringhofer, C.: Autonomous control of production networks using a pheromone approach. Phys. A 363(1), 104–114 (2006)
Markus, A., Kis Vancza, T., Monostori, L.: A market approach to holonic manufacturing. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 45(1), 433–436 (1996)
Van Brussel, H., Wyns, J., Valckenaers, P., Bongaerts, L., Peeters, P.: Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems. PROSA. Comput. Ind. 37(3), 255–274 (1998)
Nyhuis, P., Wiendahl, H.P.: Fundamentals of Production Logistics: Theory, Tools and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Hülsmann, M., Scholz-Reiter, B., Austerschulte, L., Wycisk, C., de Beer, C.: Autonomous cooperation—a way to cope with critical incidents in International Supply Networks (ISN)? An Analysis of Complex Adaptive Logistic Systems (CALS) and their Robustness. In: 24th EGOS Colloquium. Upsetting Organizations, web-publication, (2008)
Hülsmann, M., Illigen, C., Korsmeier, B., Cordes, P.: Risks resulting from autonomous co-operation technologies in logistics. In: Li, Y., Desheng, W. (eds.) Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Management Science, China, vol. 1, pp 422–426, (2010)
Hülsmann, M., Windt, K.: Changing paradigms in logistics—understanding the shift from conventional to autonomous cooperation and control. In: Hülsmann, M., Windt, K. (eds.) Understanding Autonomous Co-operation—The Impact of Autonomy on Management, Information, Communication and Material Flow, Bremen, (2006)
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Collaborative Research Centre 637 “Autonomous Cooperating Logistic Processes—A Paradigm Shift and its Limitations”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Illigen, C., Korsmeier, B., Hülsmann, M. (2013). Robustness of Complex Adaptive Logistics Systems: Effects of Autonomously Controlled Heuristics in a Real-World Car Terminal. In: Windt, K. (eds) Robust Manufacturing Control. Lecture Notes in Production Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30749-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30749-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30748-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30749-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)