Skip to main content

Hypergraph Coloring Games and Voter Models

  • Conference paper
Algorithms and Models for the Web Graph (WAW 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7323))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We analyze a network coloring game on hypergraphs which can also describe a voter model. Each node represents a voter and is colored according to its preferred candidate (or undecided). Each hyperedge is a subset of voters that can interact and influence one another. In each round of the game, one hyperedge is chosen randomly, and the voters in the hyperedge can change their colors according to some prescribed probability distribution. We analyze this interaction model based on random walks on the associated weighted, directed state graph. We consider three scenarios — a memoryless game, a partially memoryless game and the general game using the memoryless game for comparison and analysis. Under certain ‘memoryless’ restrictions, we can use semigroup spectral methods to explicitly determine the spectrum of the state graph, and the random walk on the state graph converges to its stationary distribution in O(m logn) steps, where n is the number of voters and m is the number of hyperedges. This can then be used to determine an appropriate cut-off time for voting: we can estimate probabilities that events occur within an error bound of ε by simulating the voting game for O(log(1/ε) m logn) rounds. Next, we consider a partially memoryless game whose associated random walk can be written as a linear combination of a memoryless random walk and another given random walk. In such a setting, we provide bounds on the convergence time to the stationary distribution, highlighting a tradeoff between the proportion of memorylessness and the time required. To analyze the general interaction model, we will first construct a companion memoryless process and then choose an appropriate damping constant β to build a partially memoryless process. The partially memoryless process can serve as an approximation of the actual interaction dynamics for determining the cut-off time if the damping constant is appropriately chosen either by using simulation or depending on the rules of interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldous, D., Fill, J.A.: Reversible Markov chains and random walks on graphs (preprint), http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~aldous/RWG/book.html

  2. Bidigare, T.P., Hanlon, P., Rockmore, D.N.: A combinatorial description of the spectrum for the Tsetlin library and its generalization to hyperplane arrangements. Duke Mathematical Journal 99(1), 135–174 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, K.S.: Semigroups, rings, and Markov chains. Journal of Theoretical Probability 13(3), 837–938 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, K.S., Diaconis, P.: Random walks and hyperplane arrangements. Annals of Probability 26(4), 1813–1854 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung, F.: Laplacians and the Cheeger inequality for directed graphs. Annals of Combinatorics 9(1), 1–19 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung, F., Graham, R.: Edge flipping in graphs. Advances in Applied Mathematics 48(1), 37–63 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Clifford, P., Sudbury, A.: A model for spatial conflict. Biometrika 60(3), 581–588 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellison, G.: Learning, local interaction, and coordination. Econometrica 61(3), 1047–1071 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fill, J.A.: An exact formula for the move-to-front rule for self-organizing lists. Journal of Theoretical Probability 9(1), 113–160 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Holley, R.A., Liggett, T.M.: Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model. Annals of Probability 3(4), 643–663 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Judd, S., Kearns, M.: Behavioral experiments in networked trade. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 150–159 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Judd, S., Kearns, M., Vorobeychik, Y.: Behavioral dynamics and influence in networked coloring and consensus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(34), 14978–14982 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kandori, M., Mailath, G., Rob, R.: Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games. Econometrica 61(1), 29–56 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kearns, M., Judd, S., Tan, T., Wortman, J.: Behavioral experiments on biased voting in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(5), 1347–1352 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kearns, M., Suri, S., Montfort, N.: An experimental study of the coloring problem on human subject networks. Science 313(5788), 824–827 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kearns, M., Tan, J.: Biased Voting and the Democratic Primary Problem. In: Papadimitriou, C., Zhang, S. (eds.) WINE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5385, pp. 639–652. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein-Barmen, F.: On a broader analysis of lattice theory. Mathematische Zeitschrift 46(1), 472–480 (1940) (in German)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Montanari, A., Saberi, A.: Convergence to equilibrium in local interaction games. In: Proceedings of the 50th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 303–312 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mossel, E., Schoenebeck, G.: Reaching consensus on social networks. In: Proceedings of the First Symposium on Innovations in Computer Science (ICS), pp. 214–229 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Motwani, R., Raghavan, P.: Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schützenberger, M.-P.: On left-regular bands. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 224, 777–778 (1947) (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suchecki, K., Eguíluz, V., San Miguel, M.: Voter model dynamics in complex networks: Role of dimensionality, disorder, and degree distribution. Physical Review E 72, 1–8 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tahbaz-Salehi, A., Jadbabaie, J.: Consensus over ergodic stationary graph processes. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 55(1), 225–230 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Yildiz, M.E., Pagliari, A., Ozdaglar, A., Scaglione, A.: Voting models in random networks. In: Proceedings of the Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), pp. 1–7 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Young, H.P.: The evolution of conventions. Econometrica 61(1), 57–84 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zachary, W.W.: An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. Journal of Anthropological Research 33(4), 452–473 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chung, F., Tsiatas, A. (2012). Hypergraph Coloring Games and Voter Models. In: Bonato, A., Janssen, J. (eds) Algorithms and Models for the Web Graph. WAW 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7323. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30541-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30541-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30540-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30541-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics