Skip to main content

A Paradigm Shift in Business Valuation Process Using Fuzzy Logic

  • Conference paper
Soft Computing in Management and Business Economics

Abstract

The aim of this paper is proposing an overview of valuation of companies’ process, associated to uncertainty modelization. This exposition represents a paradigm shift in the significance of what today we understand as valuation of a company. Through previous investigation published about finance literature, we prove there’s still a long way to investigate on valuation methodology in terms of fuzzy methodology. The result given in this paper represents a new working line for researchers in the valuation field, and in general, for the scientific community, who wants to study further on value of business organizations, taking into account drivers, elements and variables, than common valuation models don’t consider in the calculations. The exposition, which we propose by construction, is set like a fundamental axis to reach the higher efficiency levels in the valuation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adimando, C., Butler, R., Malley, S.: Stern Steward EVATM Round Table. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7(2), 46–70 (1994), doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00405.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., Huang, M., Santos, T.: Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1), 1–53 (2001), doi:10.1162/003355301556310

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, W., Ryan, S.: Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 38(1), 127–148 (2000), doi:10.2307/2672925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhojraj, S., Lee, C.: Who is my peer? A valuation-based approach to the selection of comparable firms. Journal of Accounting Research 40(2), 407–439 (2002), doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhojraj, S., Lee, C.: Who is my peer? A valuation-based approach to the selection of comparable firms. Journal of Accounting Research 40(2), 407–439 (2002), doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, G., Bowen, R., Wallace, J.: Does EVA (R) beat earnings? evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values. Journal of Accounting Economics 24(3), 301–336 (1997), doi:10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00010-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, C., Fuller, R.: A fuzzy approach to real option valuation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 139(2), 297–312 (2003), doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00591-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T., Jung, J.: Ethical commitment, financial performance, and valuation: An empirical investigation of korean companies. Journal of Business Ethics 81(2), 447–463 (2008), doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9506-1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., Rhodes, C.: Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management 18(2), 107–122 (2007), doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00493.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T., Koller, T., Murrin, J.: Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies, 2nd edn., Makinsey and Company, United States of America (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, A., John, K., Liu, C.: What motivates managers? evidence from organizational form changes. Journal of Corporate Finance 12(1), 1–26 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, P.: Valoración de empresas. In: como medir y gestionar la creación de valor (Tercera edición ed.), Gestión, España (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, Miller, J.: The effects of pro forma earnings disclosures on analysts’ and nonprofessional investors’ equity valuation judgments. The Accounting Review 79(3), 667–686 (2004), doi:10.2308/accr.2004.79.3.667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eduard, F.R., Reed David, L.: Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review XXV(3), 88 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S., Williams, K.: Shareholder value and financialization: Consultancy promises, management moves. Economy and Society 29(1), 80–110 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil Aluja, J.: Lances y desventuras del nuevo paradigma de la teoría de la decisión. In: Proceedings Del III Congreso SIGEF, Buenos Aires (Noviembre 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil Aluja, J.: Elements for a theory of decision in uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Lafuente, A.M.: Fuzzy logic in financial analysis. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Lafuente, A.M., Barcellos, L.: The expertons method applied in the dialogue with stakeholders. In: The 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU), Valencia-Spain (April 7, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez Jimenez, L., Blanco Pascual, L.: Enterprise valuation with track-record ratios and rates of change. European Journal of Finance 16(1), 57–78 (2010), doi:10.1080/13518470902853343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A., Keim, G.: Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2), 125–139 (2001), doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO 2-H

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S., Liao, S.: A fuzzy real option approach for investment project valuation. Expert Systems with Applications 38(12), 15296–15302 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrvol’ova, B., Markova, J., Nincak, L.: Modern methods of valuation of shares. Ekonomický časopis 59(2), 148–162 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionita, I., Stoica, M.: A new approach method of company valuation. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 10(1), 115–122 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Neave, E., Pazderka, B.: Knowledge, innovation and share value. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(2), 101–134 (2002), doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joos, P., Plesko, G.: Valuing loss firms. The Accounting Review 80(3), 847–870 (2005), doi:10.2308/accr.2005.80.3.847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., Ruback, R.: The valuation of cash flow forecast – An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance 50(4), 1059–1093 (1995), doi:10.2307/2329344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A.: Introduction to the theory of fuzzy subsets (D. L. Swanson Trans.). Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, L., Levine, R.: Complex ownership structures and corporate valuations. The Review of Financial Studies 21(2), 579–604 (2008), doi:10.1093/rfs

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Nissim, D., Thomas, J.: Is cash flow king in valuations? Financial Analysts Journal 63(2), 56–68 (2007), doi:10.2469/faj.v63.n2.4522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C., Malagoli, S., Mastroleo, G.: An alternative approach to firms’ evaluation: Expert systems and fuzzy logic. International Journal of Information Technology Decision Making 5(1), 195–225 (2006), doi:10.1142/S0219622006001812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magoc, T., Modave, F.: The optimality of non-additive approaches for portfolio selection. Expert Systems with Applications 38(10), 12967–12973 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Sayrak, A.: Corporate diversification and shareholder value: A survey of recent literature. Journal of Corporate Finance 9(1), 37–57 (2003), doi:10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00053-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maury, B., Pajuste, A.: Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking Finance 29(7), 1813–1834 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Lester, R., Cannella, A.: Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance 13(5), 829–858 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Wood, D.: Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853–886 (1997), doi:10.2307/259247

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes Kropf, M., Viswanathan, S.: Market valuation and merger waves. The Journal of Finance 59(6), 2685–2718 (2004), doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00713.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, H.T.J., Trigeorgis, L.: Real options and games: Competition, alliances and other applications of valuation and strategy. Review of Financial Economics 15(2), 95–112 (2006), doi:10.1016/j.rfe.2005.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucal, I., Kahraman, C.: Fuzzy real option valuation for oil investments. Ūkio Technologinis Ir Ekonominis Vystymas 15(4), 646–669 (2009), doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.646-669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.: Predicting stock price using fuzzy grey prediction system. Expert Systems with Applications 22(1), 33–38 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0957-4174(01)00047-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, A.: What financial and non-financial information on intangibles is value-relevant? A review of the evidence. Accounting and Business Research 38(3), 217–256 (2008), doi:10.1080/00014788.2008.9663336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, J., Chen, M., Lin, H.: Valuation by using a fuzzy discounted cash flow model. Expert Systems with Applications 28(2), 209–222 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2004.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D.: Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40(2), 185–211 (1996), doi:10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338 (1965), doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna M. Gil-Lafuente .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gil-Lafuente, A.M., Castillo-López, C., Blanco-Mesa, F.R. (2012). A Paradigm Shift in Business Valuation Process Using Fuzzy Logic. In: Gil-Lafuente, A., Gil-Lafuente, J., Merigó-Lindahl, J. (eds) Soft Computing in Management and Business Economics. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 287. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30451-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30451-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30450-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30451-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics