Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly
  • 1386 Accesses

Abstract

There is an increasing population of elderly people in Western as well as in Asian countries. Among the malignant tumors colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently seen tumors in the elderly. Since the first report by Jacobs in 1991 (Jacobs et al., Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 144–50, 1991), laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been practiced with an increasing number of cases each year. As laparoscopic colorectal surgery is less invasive than open surgery, it will be a good indication for elderly patients who tend to have comorbidity and/or frailty. Most of the short-term postoperative studies comparing laparoscopic vs open in elderly patients demonstrated the advantages of laparoscopic colectomy over open colectomy. The results of these reports demonstrated that although the length of operation was longer in laparoscopic colectomy, the postoperative hospital stay was shorter and the return of bowel function was earlier. Most of the retrospective studies showed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly patients can safely be performed as in the younger patients. However, due to the retrospective nature of the studies, still it is not yet clearly determined whether elderly patients with comorbidities can safely be operated on as in younger patients with similar comorbidities. As the indication for laparoscopic colectomy in the elderly patients expands including those with high-grade cardiopulmonary comorbidities, it should be further investigated whether the indication for laparoscopic colectomy can similarly be indicated in the elderly as in the younger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowles TA, Sanders KM et al (2008) Simplified risk stratification in elective colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 78(1–2):24–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charlson ME, Pompei P et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung HY, Chung CC et al (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1905–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado S, Lacy AM et al (2000) Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 14(1):22–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiscon V, Portale G et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer in elderly patients. Tumori 96(5):704–708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleshman J, Sargent DJ et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662; discussion 662–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fried LP, Tangen CM et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horzic M, Kopljar M et al (2007) Comparison of P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scores in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. Arch Surg 142(11):1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Issa N, Grassi C et al (2011) Laparoscopic colectomy for carcinoma of the colon in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2011–2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs M, Verdeja JC et al (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • JSES (2010) Nationwide statistics of laparoscopic surgery in Japan. J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg 15(5):565–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano S, Inomata M et al (2005) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35(8):475–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy AM, Delgado S et al (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Law WL, Chu KW et al (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195(6):768–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura T, Mitomi H et al (2011) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer: a comparison of patients 64 years or younger with those 75 years or older. Hepatogastroenterology 58(109):1200–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Person B, Cera SM et al (2008) Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 22(2):401–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM et al (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138(3):252–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sklow B, Read T et al (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17(6):923–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart BT, Stitz RW et al (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86(7):938–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan KY, Kawamura Y et al (2009) Colorectal surgery in octogenarian patients – outcomes and predictors of morbidity. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(2):185–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan KY, Konishi F (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: current knowledge and what remains unclear. Surg Today 40(2):97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan KY, Konishi F et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: a case-control study of 15 years of experience. Am J Surg 201(4):531–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tei M, Ikeda M et al (2009) Postoperative complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: comparison of open and laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(6):488–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vignali A, Di Palo S et al (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48(11):2070–2075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumio Konishi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Konishi, F. (2013). Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly Patients. In: Tan, KY. (eds) Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29883-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29883-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29882-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29883-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics