Skip to main content

About Conflict in the Theory of Belief Functions

  • Conference paper
Belief Functions: Theory and Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 164))

Abstract

In the theory of belief functions, the conflict is an important concept. Indeed, combining several imperfect experts or sources allows conflict. However, the mass appearing on the empty set during the conjunctive combination rule is generally considered as conflict, but that is not really a conflict. Some measures of conflict have been proposed, we recall some of them and we show some counter-intuitive examples with these measures. Therefore we define a conflict measure based on expected properties. This conflict measure is build from the distance-based conflict measure weighted by a degree of inclusion introduced in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chebbah, M., Ben Yaghlane, B., Martin, A.: Reliability estimation based on conflict for evidential database enrichment. In: Belief, Brest, France (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and Lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 83, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Jousselme, A.-L., Grenier, D., Bossé, E.: A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Information Fusion 2, 91–101 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jousselme, A.-L., Maupin, P.: On some properties of distances in evidence theory. In: Belief, Brest, France (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jousselme, A.-L., Maupin, P.: Distances in evidence theory: Comprehensive survey and generalizations. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klir, G.J.: Measures of uncertainty in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. In: Yager, R.R., Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 35–49. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. George, T., Pal, N.R.: Quantification of conflict in Dempster-Shafer framework: a new approach. International Journal of General Systems 24(4), 407–423 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, W.: Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions. Artificial Intelligence 170, 909–924 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, A., Osswald, C.: Toward a combination rule to deal with partial conflict and specificity in belief functions theory. In: International Conference on Information Fusion, Québec, Canada (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martin, A., Jousselme, A.-L., Osswald, C.: Conflict measure for the discounting operation on belief functions. In: International Conference on Information Fusion, Cologne, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osswald, C., Martin, A.: Understanding the large family of Dempster-Shafer theory’s fusion operators - a decision-based measure. In: International Conference on Information Fusion, Florence, Italy (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rominger, C., Martin, A.: Using the conflict: An application to sonar image registration. In: Belief, Brest, France (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smarandache, F., Martin, A., Osswald, C.: Contradiction measures and specificity degrees of basic belief assignments. In: International Conference on Information Fusion, Boston, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smets, P.: Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 5, 29–39 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smets, P.: Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions. Information Fusion 8(4), 387–412 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Wierman, M.J.: Measuring Conflict in Evidence Theory. In: IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference, vol. 3(21), pp. 1741–1745 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yager, R.R.: Entropy and Specificity in a Mathematical Theory of Evidence. International Journal of General Systems 9, 249–260 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yager, R.R.: On Considerations of Credibility of Evidence International. Journal of Approximate Reasoning 7, 45–72 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zadeh, L.A.: A mathematical theory of evidence (book review). AI Magazine 5, 81–83 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnaud Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martin, A. (2012). About Conflict in the Theory of Belief Functions. In: Denoeux, T., Masson, MH. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 164. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29461-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29461-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29460-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29461-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics