Skip to main content

Time Discounting and Time Consistency

  • Chapter
Games, Actions and Social Software

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7010))

Abstract

Time discounting is the phenomenon that a desired result in the future is perceived as less valuable than the same result now. Economic theories can take this psychological fact into account in several ways. In the economic literature the most widely used type of additive time discounting is exponential discounting. In exponential discounting, the fall of valuation depends by a constant factor on the length of the delay period. It is well known, however, that exponential time discounting often does not describe well how people actually behave. Most people are averse to short delays in gratification now, while their future selves may not mind a bit of extra waiting. This behaviour can be described well by non-exponential discounting functions such as hyperbolic discounting. In hyperbolic discounting, valuations fall rapidly for small delay periods, but the fall gets slower for longer delay periods. Hyperbolic discounting captures phenomena such as procrastination, addiction and in general inconsistency over time. This chapter investigates whether forms of non-exponential discounting, in particular close to the so called Quasi-Hyperbolic model, could also be characterized in terms of dynamically consistent choices when individuals discount the welfare of future selves as well as their payoffs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainslie, G.: Picoeconomics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ainslie, G.: Breakdown of Will. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angeletos, G., Laibson, D., Repetto, A., Tobacman, J., Weinberg, S.: The hyperbolic consumption model: Calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 47–68 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, G.S., Murphy, K.M.: A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy XCVI, 675–700 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasgupta, P., Maskin, E.: Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting. American Economic Review 95(4), 1290–1299 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T.: Time discounting and time preferences: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40, 351–401 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goleman, D.: Emotional Intelligence: Why it Can Matter More than IQ. Bantam (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, J., Köszegi, B.: Is addiction “rational”? theory and evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1261–1303 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laibson, D.: Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 443–477 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Laibson, D.: Intertemporal decision making. In: Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences. Nature Publishing Group, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., Rodriguez, M.L.: Delay of gratification in children. Science 244, 933–938 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parfit, D.: Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Phelps, E.S., Pollack, R.: On second-best national national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies 35, 185–199 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohde, K.I.M.: The hyperbolic factor: A measure of time inconsistency. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 41, 125–140 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Saez Marti, M., Weibull, J.: Discounting and altruism to future decision-makers. Journal of Economic Theory 122, 254–266 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Samuelson, P.A.: A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies 4(2), 155–161 (1937)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Sozou, P.D.: Hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London 265, 2015–2020 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dimitri, N., van Eijck, J. (2012). Time Discounting and Time Consistency. In: van Eijck, J., Verbrugge, R. (eds) Games, Actions and Social Software. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29326-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29326-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29325-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29326-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics