Skip to main content

IBMM for Inconsistent Data Identification and Adjustment in the AHP/ANP

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Processing for the AHP/ANP

Part of the book series: Quantitative Management ((QUANT,volume 1))

  • 1387 Accesses

Abstract

As stated previously, the inconsistent elements should be identified if the pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) failed to the consistency test, therefore, the methods for identifying and adjusting the inconsistent elements in the PCM have been extensively studied since the AHP/ANP were developed by Saaty. However, existing methods are either too complicated to be applied in the revising process of the inconsistent comparison matrix or are difficult to preserve most of the original comparison information due to the use of a new pairwise comparison matrix. Therefore, Ergu et al. (2011b) developed a simple method for improving the consistency ratio of the pairwise comparison matrix in ANP, namely, an induced bias matrix (IBM) was developed to identify and adjust the inconsistent data in the ANP/AHP. The proposed method was further extended to estimate the missing item scores, optimize the questionnaire design and analyze the risk in decision making as well as task scheduling and resource allocation (Ergu et al. 2011c, 2011d, 2011e; Ergu and Kou 2011). To make the proposed model more comprehensive and robust, Ergu et al. (2011f) integrated the fundamental theorems and corollaries into one model, the induced bias matrix model (IBMM), and the related theorems and corollaries were also proved mathematically in Ergu et al. (2011b, 2011c). In this Chapter, all theorems and corollaries related to IBMM and their proofs are discussed systematically in order to understand the proposed IBMM explicitly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bozóki S, Fülöp J, Poesz A (2011) On pairwise comparison matrices that can be made consistent by the modification of a few elements. Cent Eur J Oper Res 19:157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao D, Leung LC, Law JS (2008) Modifying inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process: a heuristic approach. Decis Supp Syst 44:944–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergu D, Kou G (2011) Questionnaire design improvement and missing item scores estimation for rapid and efficient decision making. Ann Oper Res 2011. doi:10.1007/s10479-011-0922-3

  • Ergu D, Kou G, Peng Y, Shi Y (2011b) A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP. Eur J Oper Res 213(1):246–259. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergu D, Kou G, Peng Y, Shi Y, Shi Yu (2011c) BIMM: a bias induced matrix model for incomplete reciprocal pairwise comparison matrix. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal. doi:10.1002/mcda.472

  • Ergu D, Kou G, Peng Y, Shi Y, Shi Yu (2011d) The analytic hierarchy process: task scheduling and resource allocation in cloud computing environment. J Supercomput. doi:10.1007/s11227-011-0625-1

  • Ergu D, Kou G, Shi Y, Shi Yu (2011e) Analytic network process in risk assessment and decision analysis. Comput Oper Res. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.03.005

  • Ergu D, Kou G, Peng Y, Shi Y (2011f) Further discussions on “A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP”. Working paper, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Iida Y (2009) Ordinality consistency test about items and notation of a pairwise comparison matrix in AHP. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiesielewicz M, Uden E (2002) Problem of inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in sense of AHP. In: Sloot PMA et al. (eds) Computational science – ICCS 2002, Lecture notes in computer science 2329, pp 468–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W (1999) A new method of rectifying judgment matrix. Syst Eng Theory Pract 6:30–34, in Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1991) Some mathematical concepts of the analytic hierarchy process. Behaviormetrika 29:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2001b) Deriving the AHP 1–9 scale from first principles. In: ISAHP 2001 proceedings, Bern, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2003) Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur J Oper Res 145(1):85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Wei C (1999) A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 116:443–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kou, G., Ergu, D., Peng, Y., Shi, Y. (2013). IBMM for Inconsistent Data Identification and Adjustment in the AHP/ANP. In: Data Processing for the AHP/ANP. Quantitative Management, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29213-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics