Skip to main content

Detecting Conflicts in Commitments

  • Conference paper
Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies IX (DALT 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7169))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Commitments are being used widely to specify interaction among autonomous agents in multiagent systems. While various formalizations for a commitment and its life cycle exist, there has been little work that studies commitments in relation to each other. However, in many situations, the content and state of one commitment may render another commitment useless or even worse create conflicts. This paper studies commitments in relation to each other. Following and extending an earlier formalization by Chesani et al., we identify key conflict relations among commitments. The conflict detection can be used to detect violation of commitments before the actual violation occurs during agent interaction (run-time) and this knowledge can be used to guide an agent to avoid the violation. It can also be used during creation of multiagent contracts to identify conflicts in the contracts (compile-time). We implement our method in \(\mathcal{REC}\) and present a case study to demonstrate the benefit of our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberti, M., Chesani, F., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Torroni, P.: Verifiable agent interaction in abductive logic programming: The sciff framework. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 9, 1–43 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Castelfranchi, C.: Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations. In: Lesser, V.R., Gasser, L. (eds.) ICMAS, pp. 41–48. The MIT Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M., Torroni, P.: Commitment Tracking via the Reactive Event Calculus. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 91–96. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Desai, N., Narendra, N.C., Singh, M.P.: Checking Correctness of Business Contracts via Commitments. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2008, vol. 2, pp. 787–794 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: Operational Specification of a Commitment-Based Agent Communication Language. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2002, pp. 536–542. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A Logic-based Calculus of Events. New Generation Computing 4, 67–95 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mallya, A.U., Huhns, M.N.: Commitments Among Agents. IEEE Internet Computing 7, 90–93 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mallya, A.U., Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Resolving Commitments Among Autonomous Agents. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 166–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Shanahan, M.: The Event Calculus Explained. In: Veloso, M.M., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Today. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1600, pp. 409–430. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, M.P.: Agent Communication Languages: Rethinking the Principles. Computer 31(12), 40–47 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh, M.P.: An Ontology for Commitments in Multiagent Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 97–113 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, M.P.: Semantical Considerations on Dialectical and Practical Commitments. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2008, pp. 176–181. AAAI Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winikoff, M., Liu, W., Harland, J.: Enhancing Commitment Machines. In: Leite, J., Omicini, A., Torroni, P., Yolum, p. (eds.) DALT 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3476, pp. 198–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Flexible Protocol Specification and Execution: Applying Event Calculus Planning using Commitments. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2002, pp. 527–534. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Günay, A., Yolum, P. (2012). Detecting Conflicts in Commitments. In: Sakama, C., Sardina, S., Vasconcelos, W., Winikoff, M. (eds) Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies IX. DALT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7169. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29113-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29113-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29112-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29113-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics