Skip to main content

Social Media and New Audiences as a New Challenge for Traditional and New Media Industries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Media Management

Part of the book series: Media Business and Innovation ((MEDIA))

Abstract

Over the first decade of the twentieth century, the big revolution in information and communications technologies has resulted in many innovations that are having increasingly visible effects on the daily life of media users.

These developments are not only the logical result of a technological evolution. They affect the way people interact with media. What these changes on media have represented for the field of the media management? Do media managers currently really know their audience’s attitudes and responses? Even more, are they still acting and responding as massive media audiences?

Even in developing media markets, like in Latin America, media economies have moved from the massive and passive audiences’ model to the more informed, engaged and influential publics environment. Can managers keep safe the bridge between audiences and advertisers from the storm, when content is everyday available on multiple platforms and audiences are capable to create their own media diets and schedules?

The chapter is aimed to provide an overview on the recent academic literature about audience’s analysis under the veneer of segmentation, fragmentation, even erosion of traditional mass audiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There seems to be a kind of divergence on this point. In this regard see Huertas (2002, p. 101) and Mattelart and Mattelart (1997, p. 102).

  2. 2.

    We follow Mattelart and Mattelart to give a clear explanation of the concept of entropy. Entropy, is understood here as a trend which has the nature to destroy what is ordered and to precipitate the biological degradation and social disorder, constitutes the fundamental threat. The information, the machines that treat it and the networks which they weave are the only ones able to combat this trend to the entropy (Mattelart and Mattelart 1997, p. 47).

  3. 3.

    And numerous; a list of closed questions would leave out a whole range of possibilities. This is what we mean by in relation with the previous point.

  4. 4.

    Colombia has the second Hispanic largest potential media market after México, considering population, and the third largest in Latin America after México and Brazil (DANE 2007).

References

  • Albarran, A. (2010). The transformation of the media and communication industries. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. (2006). The Long Tail: Why the future of business is selling less or more. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arango Forero, G., Arango, M. F., Llaña, L., & Serrano, M. C. (2010). Colombian media in the XXI century: The re-conquest by foreign investment. Palabra Clave, 13(1), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermejo, F. (2009). Audience manufacture in historical perspective: From broadcasting to Google. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, A. (2004, July 12). The vanishing mass market. Business Week, 60–68. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_28

  • Couldry, N. (2009). Does ‘the media’ have a future? European Journal of Communication, 24(437), 437–450. doi:10.1177/0267323109345604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cover, R. (2006). Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media Society, 8(139), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., Morley, D., & Walkerdine, V. (1998). Estudios culturales y comunicación [Cultural studies and communication]. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANE, National Statistics Administrative Department. (2007). Proyecciones nacionales y departamentales de población 2006-2020. Bogotá: DANE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosk, A. (2010). Situación de Internet en Latinoamérica. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/francoalfero/estado-de-internet-en-latinoamrica-comscore-2010

  • Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haridakis, P. M., & Whitmore, E. H. (2006). Understanding electronic media audiences: The pioneering research of Alan m. Rubin. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(4), 766–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huertas, A. (2002). La audiencia investigada [Audience investigated]. Barcelona: Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Form garden to earth. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, A. J., Wood, E. H., & Parsons, A. (2008). Exploring the audience’s role: A decoding model for the 21st century. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(2), 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1985). Usos y gratificaciones de la comunicación de masas [Uses and gratifications of mass communication]. In M. De Moragas (Ed.), (1992) Sociología de la comunicación de masas [Sociology of mass communication]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (1997). Audience analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAMAC. (2010). Penetración de TV Paga-Latinoamérica. Retrieved Agosto, 2010, from http://www.lamac.org/Espa%c3%b1ol/Investigaci%c3%b3n/Penetraci%c3%b3n/Penetraci%c3%b3n_de_TV_de_Paga/Latinoam%c3%a9rica/

  • Lin, C. A. (1994). Audience fragmentation in a competitive video marketplace. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(6), 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist, U., Bjørn-Andersen, N., Kaldalóns, O. S., Krokan, A., & Persson, C. Nordic Innovation Centre (NICe), VTT, SFTI-Packforsk, NTNU, CBS, ICEPRO. (2009). New business forms in e-business and media, ‘e-media’ (Project 06212). Retrieved from http://www.itu.dk/people/rkva/2011-Spring-EB22/readings/E-MediaFinalReportMay09.pdf

  • Mattelart, M., & Mattelart, A. (1997). Historia de las teorías de la comunicación [History of communication theories]. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Barbero, J. (1987). De los medios a las mediaciones. Comunicación, cultura y hegemonía [Communication, culture and hegemony: From the media to the mediations]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, M. (1992). ¿Un nuevo modelo de comunicación en América Latina? Conversaciones con nueve estudiosos de los medios y la cultura [A new model of communication in Latin America? Conversations with nine scholars of media and culture]. Ciudad de México: Fundación M. Buendía.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. (2001). The audience product and the new media environment: Implications for the economics of media industries. The International Journal on Media Management, 3(II), 66–73. Retrieved from The audience product and the new media environment: Implications for the economics of media industries.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. (2008a). Revisiting “mass communication” and the “work” of the audience in the new media environment. Informally published manuscript, The Donald McGannon Communication Research Center, Fordham University, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.fordham.edu/images/undergraduate/communications/revisitingmasscommunication.pdf

  • Napoli, P. (2008b). Toward a model of audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. McGannon Center Working Paper Series. Paper 15. Retrieved from http://fordham.bepress.com/mcgannon_working_papers/15

  • Napoli, P. (2010). Revisiting ‘mass communication’ and the ‘work’ of the audience in the new media environment. Media Culture Society, 32(505), 505–516. doi:10.1177/0163443710361658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phallen, P. F. (2006). Audience research and analysis. In A. Albarran, S. Chan-Olmsted, & M. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 623–636). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. (2000). Audience fragmentation and structural limits on media innovation and diversity. In J. van Cuilenburg & R. van der Wurff (Eds.), Media and open societies. Cultural, economic and policy foundations for media openness and diversity in East and West (pp. 180–191). Amsterdam: Het Spinhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piscitelli, A. (1998). Post Televisión, ecología de los medios en la era de Internet. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, D., & Shaver, M. A. (2006). Directions for media management research in the 21st century. In A. Albarran, S. Chan-Olmsted, & M. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 639–654). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, N. (1998). Culturas mediáticas [Media cultures]. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 332–348. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uribe-Jongbloed, E. (2011). Estudios de medios de comunicación en idiomas minoritarios y la comunicación para el cambio social: diálogo entre Europa y América Latina. Investigación y Desarrollo, 18(2), 2–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arango-Forero, G., Roncallo-Dow, S. (2013). Social Media and New Audiences as a New Challenge for Traditional and New Media Industries. In: Friedrichsen, M., Mühl-Benninghaus, W. (eds) Handbook of Social Media Management. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28897-5_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics