Skip to main content

Social Media: Managerial and Economic Opportunities and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Media Management

Part of the book series: Media Business and Innovation ((MEDIA))

Abstract

Social media allow media companies to nurture and develop conversations, improving trust; understand demands; sense environmental and societal concerns, assess risks, and, in general, be part of the public debate. Thus provide an opportunity to accomplish media’s broad social responsibility and increase value creation. This chapter tries to understand the profile or people using social networks and how social media help to communicate and accomplish social and individual needs. It investigates both attitudes and the cultural and market implications of social media. It uses two quantitative telephone surveys with a structured questionnaire and a literature review of the field as research tools.

Our research suggests that higher usage and gratifications are associated with sharing music and video content. Social media and the rest of “online media” are different: markets have become conversations, with far-reaching consequences. The emphasis is again in person-to-person communication. An individual that reads something and shares it with others is both a communicator and a contact point in the media network

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Research results are presented in the following web addresses: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14714405/Presentations_ioc09/IoC_social_media_Research_180208.pdf and http://www.instofcom.gr/tools/download_file.php?which_file=../media/download_items/ioc10_socialmedia_surveydamsm.pdf

References

  • Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In P. Golle & G. Danezis (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (pp. 36–58). Cambridge, UK: Robinson College.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2009, June 1). What’s a friend worth? BusinessWeek, 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html.

  • BIGresearch. (2009, August 13). BIGresearch profiles social media users. Retrieved from http://www.rbr.com/media-news/research/16395.html.

  • Boyd, D. (2006). Friendster lost steam. Is MySpace just a fad? Apophenia Blog. Retrieved from http://www.danah.org/papers/FriendsterMySpaceEssay.html.

  • Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravella, M., Ekachai, D., Jaeger, G., & Zahay, D. (2009). Web 2.0 opportunities and challenges for advertising educators. Journal of Advertising Education, 13(1), 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. (2009). The little book of twitter: Get tweetwise. London: Michael O’Mara Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S.R., & Passerini, K. (2007), Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. Paper presented at the Proceedings of AMCIS 2007, Keystone, CO. Retrieved from http://csis.pace.edu/-dwyer/research/DwyerAMCIS2007.pdf

  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007a). The benefits of Facebook friends: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007b). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social Capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajjala, R. (2007). Shifting frame: Race, ethnicity, and intercultural communications in online social networking and virtual work. In M. B. Hinner (Ed.), The role of communication in business transactions and relationships (pp. 257–276). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geidner, N.W., Flook, C. A., & Bell, M.W. (2007). Masculinity and online social networks: Male self-identification on Facebook.com. Eastern Communication Association 98th Annual Meeting, Providence, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. (2006, September). Living online: The end of privacy? New Scientist, 2569. Retrieved from http://www.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19125691.700-living-online-the-end-of-privacy.html

  • Goldberg, S. (2007, May 13). Analysis: Friendster is doing just fine. Digital Media Wire. Retrieved from http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/05/14/analysis-friendster-is-doing-just-fine

  • Herring, S.C., Paolilllo, J.C., Ramos Vielba, I., Kouper, I., Wright E., Stoerger, S., Scheidt, L. A., & Clark. B. (2007). Language Networks on LiveJournal. Proceedings of Fortieth HawaiI International Conference on System Science. Los Alamitos, AC: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006).Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Banff, AB: CSCW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalamas, M., Mitchell, T., & Lester, D. (2009). Modeling social media use: Bridging the gap in higher education. Journal of Advertising Education, 13(1), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheriaty, A. (2010, February). The era of the Narcissist. First Things. Retrieved May 2010 from http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2010/02/the-era-of-the-narcissist

  • Kornblum, J., & Marklein M. B. (2006, March 8).What you say online could haunt you. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/internetprivacy/2006-03-08-facebook-myspace_x.htm

  • Kumar. R., Novak, J., & Tomkins, A. (2006). Structure and evolution of online social networks. In Proceedings of 12th International Conference of Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining (pp. 611–617). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 167–170). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (2005, October). I am a lot more interesting than a Friendster profile. Identity presentation, authenticity and power in social networking services. Internet Research 6.0, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on Facebook: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56 (1), 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, R., & Near, C. (2007, Febraury). Jesus is my friend: Religiosity as a mediating factor in Internet social networking use. AEJMC Midwinter Conference, Reno, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, J., Cunningham, S., Hartley, J., & Ormerod, J. (2008). Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32, 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualman, E. (2009). Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D., Lewin, J., & Strutton, D. (2011). Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on Social Networks? How gender and age shape receptivity. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 258–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The Narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pérez-Latrel, F.J., Tsourvakas, G. (2013). Social Media: Managerial and Economic Opportunities and Challenges. In: Friedrichsen, M., Mühl-Benninghaus, W. (eds) Handbook of Social Media Management. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28897-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics