Skip to main content

Duality between Merging Operators and Social Contraction Operators

  • Conference paper
Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7180))

  • 742 Accesses

Abstract

In the AGM (Alchourrón-Gärdenfors-Makinson) framework there exists a duality between revision operators and contraction operators. This duality is given by the Levi identity and the Harper identity. The former allows to define a revision operator starting from a contraction operator. The latter allows to define a contraction operator starting from a revision operator. In this work we show that this duality can be extended to a duality between merging operators and social contraction operators through some identities in the style of the Levi and Harper identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alchourrón, C.E., Makinson, D.: The logic of theory change: Contraction functions and their associated revision functions. Theoria 48, 14–37 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alchourrón, C.E., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Safe contraction. Studia Logica 44, 405–422 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Alchourrón, C.E., Makinson, D.: Maps between some different kinds of contraction function: the finite case. Studia Logica 45, 187–198 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J.: Combining multiple knowledge bases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 3(2), 208–220 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Combining knowledge bases consisting of first-order theories. Computational Intelligence 8(1), 45–71 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Booth, R.: Social contraction and belief negotiation. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2002), pp. 374–384 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Booth, R.: Social contraction and belief negotiation. Information Fusion 7(1), 19–34 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Booth, R., Meyer, T.: Equilibria in social belief removal. Synthese 177(supplement-1), 97–123 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chacón, J.L., Pino Pérez, R.: Merging operators: Beyond the finite case. Information Fusion 7(1), 41–60 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F., Lang, J.: Belief extrapolation (or how to reason about observations and unpredicted change). Artif. Intell. 175(2), 760–790 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F., Lang, J.: Belief extrapolation (or how to reason about observations and unpredicted change). In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2002), pp. 497–508 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in flux. MIT Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gärdenfors, P. (ed.): Belief Revision. Cambridge University Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harper, W.L.: Rational conceptual change. In: PSA 1976 East Lansing, vol. 12, pp. 462–494. Philosophy of Science Association, Mich. (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herzig, A., Rifi, O.: Update operations: a review. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1998), pp. 13–17 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1991), pp. 387–394 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artificial Intelligence 52, 263–294 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Konieczny, S., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: DA2 merging operators. Artificial Intelligence 157(1-2), 49–79 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Konieczny, S., Pino Pérez, R.: Merging information under constraints: a logical framework. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(5), 773–808 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Konieczny, S., Pino Pérez, R.: Logic based merging. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40, 239–270 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Levi, I.: Subjunctives, dispositions and chances. Synthese 34, 423–455 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: Arbitration (or how to merge knowledge bases). IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 10(1), 76–90 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin, J.: Integration of weighted knowledge bases. Artificial Intelligence 83(2), 363–378 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin, J., Mendelzon, A.O.: Merging databases under constraints. International Journal of Cooperative Information System 7(1), 55–76 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin, J., Mendelzon, A.O.: Knowledge base merging by majority. In: Dynamic Worlds: From the Frame Problem to Knowledge Management. Kluwer (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lobo, J., Uzcátegui, C.: Abductive change operators. Fundamenta Informaticae 27(4), 385–411 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Revesz, P.Z.: On the semantics of theory change: arbitration between old and new information. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Databases, pp. 71–92 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Revesz, P.Z.: On the semantics of arbitration. International Journal of Algebra and Computation 7(2), 133–160 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chacón, J.L., Pino Pérez, R. (2012). Duality between Merging Operators and Social Contraction Operators. In: Bjørner, N., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7180. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28717-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28717-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28716-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28717-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics