Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7195))

Abstract

[Context and motivation] Quality is one of the most critical success factors of software products. [Question / problem] Nevertheless, during software development processes software quality is still not given the proper attention and relevance it deserves. [Principal ideas / results] This paper outlines ten common myths about software quality prevailing in practice. [Contribution] The discussion of these myths unveils challenges which need further attention in requirements engineering (RE) research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albin, S.T.: The Art of Software Architecture: Design Methods and Techniques. Wiley, Indianapolis (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glinz, M.: On Non-Functional Requirements. In: 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007), Delhi, pp. 21–26. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hochmüller, E.: Towards the Proper Integration of Extra-Functional Requirements. The Australian Journal of Information Systems 6(2), 98–117 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hochmüller, E.: The Requirements Engineer as a Liaison Officer in Agile Software Development. In: 1st Agile Requirements Engineering Workshop, Lancaster. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. IEEE: IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications. IEEE Std. 830-1993 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO/IEC: Software Engineering – Product Quality. Part 1: Quality Model. ISO/IEC 9126-1 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jung, H.T., Lee, G.H.: A Systematic Software Development Process for Non-Functional Requirements. In: International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC 2010), Jeju Island, pp. 431–436 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Naur, P., Randell, B. (eds.): Software engineering. Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Garmisch (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Orr, K.: Agile Requirements: Opportunity or Oxymoron? IEEE Software 21(3), 71–73 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paech, B., Kerkow, D.: Non-Functional Requirements Engineering – Quality is Essential. In: REFSQ 2004 - 10th Anniversary Booklet, Riga, pp. 27–40 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ullah, S., Iqbal, M., Khan, A.M.: A Survey on Issues in Non-Functional Requirements Elicitation. In: International Conference on Computer Networks and Information Technology (ICCNIT), Abbottabad, pp. 333–340. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hochmüller, E. (2012). 10 Myths of Software Quality. In: Regnell, B., Damian, D. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28714-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28714-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28713-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28714-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics