Abstract
While especially in the early communist system judges were pariahs, in post-communism their role was enhanced. Building a rule-of-law state to a certain extent also entails building a lawyers’ state. Law is now one of the most prestigious fields of study; the legal profession is increasingly honoured both financially and in terms of prestige. Still, we can easily find that in Central-Eastern Europe the judiciary is one of the least popular professions among the general public; judges are distrusted, often seen as corrupt (which is usually a false image) and inefficient (which is quite often a correct perception).
All opinions in this article are personal views of the author and not of the institutions he works with.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kühn, Z. (2012). Judicial Administration Reforms in Central-Eastern Europe: Lessons to be Learned. In: Seibert-Fohr, A. (eds) Judicial Independence in Transition. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 233. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28298-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28299-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)