Abstract
Architectural design and design decisions are the key components of architectural knowledge. However, concerns, rationales, and risks should be also captured to prevent knowledge vaporization. So, how to deal with architectural knowledge in incremental knowledge refinement? We believe that usage of the knowledge repository system can support architecture evolution. In this paper, a model of knowledge repository is presented. In this model, the decision-centric approach is complemented with the architectural views to support indirect interrelations between design decisions. Support for agile development was one of the key aspects of the model design, therefore knowledge vaporisation might be reduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clements, D.: Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley Professional (2002)
Kruchten, P., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Building Up and Reasoning About Architectural Knowledge. In: Hofmeister, C., Crnković, I., Reussner, R. (eds.) QoSA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4214, pp. 43–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Kruchten, P.: The 4+ 1 View Model of architecture. IEEE Software 12(6), 42–50 (1995)
Kennaley, M.: The 3+1 Views of Architecture (in 3d): An Amplification of the 4+1 Viewpoint Framework. In: Proc. of the 7th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2008), pp. 299–302. IEEE Computer Society (2008)
IEEE 1471:2000–Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software Intensive Systems (2000)
ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 42010 (IEEE P42010), Systems and Software Engineering – Architecture Description, WD3 (2008)
Jansen, A., Bosch, J.: Software Architecture as a Set of Architectural Design Decisions. In: Proc. of the 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2005), pp. 109–120. IEEE Computer Society (2005)
Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley Professional (2003)
Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley Professional (1999)
Tang, A., Jin, Y., Han, J.: A Rationale-based Architecture Model for Design Traceability and Reasoning. Journal of Systems and Software 80(6), 918–934 (2007)
Wang, Z., Sherdil, K., Madhavji, N.H.: Acca: An Architecture-centric Concern Analysis Method. In: Proc. of the 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2005), pp. 99–108. IEEE Computer Society (2005)
Jansen, A., Bosch, J.: Evaluation of Tool Support for Architectural Evolution. In: Proc. of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2004), pp. 375–378. IEEE (2004)
Babar, M., Gorton, I.: A Tool for Managing Software Architecture Knowledge. In: Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge, Rationale, and Design Intent, p. 11. IEEE (2007)
Capilla, R., Nava, F., Pérez, S., Dueñas, J.: A Web-based Tool for Managing Architectural Design Decisions. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 31(5) (2006)
Jansen, A., Van der Ven, J., Avgeriou, P., Hammer, D.: Tool Support for Architectural Decisions. In: Proc. of the 6th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2007), p. 4. IEEE Computer Society (2007)
Kruchten, P., Lago, P., van Vliet, H., Wolf, T.: Building up and Exploiting Architectural Knowledge. In: Proc. of the 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2005), pp. 291–292. IEEE Computer Society (2005)
Tyree, J., Akerman, A.: Architecture Decisions: Demystifying Architecture. IEEE Software 22(2), 19–27 (2005)
Kleppe, A., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture–Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley Professional (2003)
Kruchten, P.: An Ontology of Architectural Design Decisions in Software Intensive Systems. In: Proc. of the 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability, pp. 54–61 (2004)
Software Engineering – Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Guide to SQuaRE. ISO/IEC 25000:2005(E) (2005)
Michalik, B., Nawrocki, J., Ochodek, M.: 3-step Knowledge Transition: a Case Study on Architecture Evaluation. In: Proc. of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 741–748. ACM, New York (2008)
Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Evaluating Software Architectures. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)
Garlan, D., Monroe, R., Wile, D.: Acme: An Architecture Description Interchange Language. In: Proc. of the 1997 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, pp. 169–183. IBM Press (1997)
Herzberg, D.: UML-RT as a Candidate for Modeling Embedded Real-Time Systems in the Telecommunication Domain. In: France, R.B. (ed.) UML 1999. LNCS, vol. 1723, pp. 330–338. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Bjerkander, M., Kobryn, C.: Architecting Systems with UML 2.0. IEEE Software 20(4), 57–61 (2003)
Alliance, O.: Osgi Service Platform, Core Specification Release 4. Draft (July 2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Michalik, B., Nawrocki, J. (2012). Towards Decision Centric Repository of Architectural Knowledge. In: Szmuc, T., Szpyrka, M., Zendulka, J. (eds) Advances in Software Engineering Techniques. CEE-SET 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7054. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28038-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28038-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28037-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28038-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)