Skip to main content

Careflow Personalization Services: Concepts and Tool for the Evaluation of Computer-Interpretable Guidelines

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Representation for Health-Care (KR4HC 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6924))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Healthcare professionals often need to adapt Clinical Guidelines to obtain personalized treatment plans for their patients. This adaptation is performed according to the patient’s health state, but also takes into account implicit information (e.g., patients’ preferences, local restrictions, etc). It may demand huge efforts, is error prone and the resulting guideline can contain contradictions. In this sense, Computer-Interpretable Guidelines associated with intelligent systems, offer additional support for healthcare professionals throughout the definition of a treatment plan. In this paper, we present an approach using Semantic Web Technologies to evaluate care actions and detect potential contradictions in the personalization process, taking into account the restrictions and needs for adaptation. This approach is based on the HL7 Reference Information Model, the UMLS Semantic Network and is compatible with most of Computer-Interpretable Guidelines formalisms. The prototype supporting our approach is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Francke, A.L., Smit, M.C., de Veer, A.J.E., Mistiaen, P.: Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 8, 38 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel, V.L., Arocha, J.F., Diermeier, M., Greenes, R.A., Shortliffe, E.H.: Methods of cognitive analysis to support the design and evaluation of biomedical systems: the case of clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 34, 52–66 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tu, S.W., Campbell, J.R., Glasgow, J., Nyman, M.A., McClure, R., McClay, J., Parker, C., Hrabak, K.M., Berg, D., Weida, T., Mansfield, J.G., Musen, M.A., Abarbanel, R.M.: The SAGE Guideline Model: achievements and overview. Journal ofthe American Medical Informatics Association 14(5), 589–598 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, J., Johns, N., Rahmanzadeh, A.: Disseminating medical knowledge: The PROforma approach. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 14(1-2), 157–181 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peleg, M., Boxwala, A., Tu, S., Wang, D., Ogunyemi, O., Zeng, Q.: Guideline Interchange Format 3.5 Technical Specification, May 4 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peleg, M., Keren, S., Denekamp, Y.: Mapping computerized clinical guidelines to electronic medical records: Knowledge-data ontological mapper (KDOM). Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41, 180–201 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Laleci, G.B., Dogac, A.: A Semantically Enriched Clinical Guideline Model Enabling Deployment in Heterogeneous Healthcare Environments. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 13(2) (March 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner, R.M., Pryor, T.A., Warner, H.R.: The HELP hospital information system: update 1998. International Journal of Medical Informatics 54, 169–182 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R.A., Hall, R., Johnson, P.D., Jones, N., Kumar, A., Miksch, S., Quaglini, S., Seyfang, A., Shortliffe, E.H., Stefanelli, M.: Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10, 52–68 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. BCC Lam, Clinical Guidelines and Evidence-Based Medicine. Hong Kong Journal of Paediatrics (new series) 7(1), 2–9 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groot, P., Hommersom, A., Lucas, P.: Adaptation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. In: Ten Teije, A., et al. (eds.) Computer-Based Medical Guidelines and Protocols: A Primer and Current Trends, pp. 121–139. IOS Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alexandrou, D.A., Skitsas, I.E., Mentzas, G.N.: A holistic environment for the design and execution of self-adaptive clinical pathways. IEEE Transactions on Information Technologyin Biomedicine 15(1), 108–118 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grandoa, A., Peleg, M., Glasspoola, D.: A goal-oriented framework for specifying clinical guidelines and handling medical errors. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 43(2), 287–299 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peleg, M., Wang, D., Fodor, A., Keren, S., Karnieli, E.: Lessons Learned from Adapting a Generic Narrative Diabetic-Foot Guideline to an Institutional Decision-Support System. In: Ten Teije, A., et al. (eds.) Computer-based Medical Guidelines and Protocols: A Primer and Current Trends, pp. 243–252. IOS Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lieber, J., d’Aquin, M., Badra, F., Napoli, A.: Modeling adaptation of breast cancer treatment decision protocols in the KASIMIR project. Journal of Applied Intelligence 28(3), 261–274 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abidi, S.R.: A Knowledge Management Framework to Develop, Model, Align and Operationalize Clinical Pathways to Provide Decision Support for Comorbid Diseases. PhD thesis, Interdisciplinary PhD Program, Dalhousie University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Terenziani, P., Montani, S., Bottrighi, A., Torchio, M., Molino, G., Correndo, G.: A context-adaptable approach to clinical guidelines. Studies in Health Technologyand Informatics 107(1), 169–173 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bonacin, R., Da Silveira, M., Pruski, C.: From Medical Guidelines to Personalized Careflows: the iCareflow Ontological Framework. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Australia (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pruski, C., Bonacin, R., Da Silveira, M.: Towards the Formalization of Medical Actions using Patterns and Semantic Web Technologies. In: Peleg, M., Lavrač, N., Combi, C. (eds.) AIME 2011. LNCS, vol. 6747, pp. 302–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Benzchawel, S., Da Silveira, M.: Protecting Patient Privacy when Sharing Medical Data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine (eTelemed), France (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bonacin, R., Pruski, C., Da Silveira, M. (2012). Careflow Personalization Services: Concepts and Tool for the Evaluation of Computer-Interpretable Guidelines. In: Riaño, D., ten Teije, A., Miksch, S. (eds) Knowledge Representation for Health-Care. KR4HC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6924. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27697-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27697-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27696-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27697-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics