Skip to main content

Reasoning with Effects of Clinical Guideline Actions Using OWL: AL Amyloidosis as a Case Study

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Representation for Health-Care (KR4HC 2011)

Abstract

We developed an ontology that allows representation and reasoning with effects of clinical actions. The ontology can support three important use-cases: (1) summarization and explanation of observed clinical states, (2) enhancing patient safety using safety rules, and (3) assessing guideline compliance. In this paper we focus on explanation of observed clinical states based on abductive reasoning that utilizes a causal network. We demonstrate our approach using examples taken from a guideline for management of amyloidosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Peleg, M., Kantor, R.: Approaches for guideline versioning using GLIF. In: Proc. AMIA Symp. 2003, pp. 509–513 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Societa Italiana per l’Amiloidosi. Terapia dell’Amiloidosi AL sistemica- Linee guida (2009), www.amiloidosi.it

  3. Sipe, J.D., Benson, M.D., Buxbaum, J.N., Ikeda, S., Merlini, G., Saraiva, M.J., et al.: Amyloid fibril protein nomenclature: 2010 recommendations from the nomenclature committee of the International Society of Amyloidosis. Amyloid 17(3-4), 101–104 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Westermark, P., Benson, M.D., Buxbaum, J.N., Cohen, A.S., Frangione, B., Ikeda, S., et al.: A primer of amyloid nomenclature. Amyloid 14(3), 179–183 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palladini, G., Merlini, G.: Current treatment of AL amyloidosis. Haematologica 94(8), 1044–1048 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Knublauch, H., Horridge, M., Rector, A.L., Stevens, R., Drummond, N., Lord, P., et al.: The Protege OWL Experience: workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions. In: Fourth International Semantic Web Conference, Galway, Ireland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: Goal-driven Analysis of Process Model Validity. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 521–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gertz, M.A., Comenzo, R., Falk, R.H, Fermand, J.P., Hazenberg, B.P., Hawkins, P.N., et al.: Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): a consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis, Tours, France, April 18-22 (2004); Am. J. Hematol. 79(4), 319–328 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrari, R., Caffi, E., Rubrichi, S., Quaglini, S., Stefanelli, M., Russo, P., Palladini, G., Lavatelli, F., Merlini, G.: AMIloidosi CArtella (AMICA): an electronic patient record specifically designed for an amyloidosis network. Amyloid 17(1), 88 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fankam, C., Jean, S., Pierra, G., Bellatreche, L., Ait-ameur, Y.: Towards Connecting Database Applications to Ontologies. In: Intl. Conf. on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications, pp. 131–137 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics. Logic J. of IGPL 8(3), 239–263 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Clancey, W.J.: From Guidon to Neomycin and Heracles in Twenty Short Lessons: ORN Final Report 1979-1985. AI Magazine 7(3), 40–60 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chandrasekaran, B., Swartout, W.: Explanations in Knowledge Systems: the Role of Explicit Representation of Design Knowledge. IEEE Intelligent Systems 6(3), 47–49 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patil, R.S.: Causal Representation of Patient Illness for Electrolyte and Acid-Base Diagnosis. MIT, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pople, H.E.: Heuristic Methods for Imposing Structure on Ill-Structured Problems: The Structuring of Medical Diagnostics. In: Szolovits, P. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Westview Press, Boulder (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fikes, R.E., Nilsson, N.J.: STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving, Technical Note 43r. Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fox, J., Rahmanzadeh, A.: Disseminating medical knowledge: the PROforma approach. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 14, 157–181 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shahar, Y., Miksch, S., Johnson, P.: An Intention-Based Language for Representing Clinical Guidelines. In: Cimino, J.J. (ed.) AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, pp. 592–596. Hanley & Belfus, Washington, D.C (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grando, A.M., Peleg, M., Glasspool, D.: A goal-oriented framework for specifying clinical guidelines and handling medical errors. J. of Biomedical Informatics 1(2), 287–299 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Advani, A., Lo, K., Shahar, Y.: Intention-Based Critiquing of Guideline-Oriented Medical Care. In: Proc. AMIA Annual Symposium, pp. 483–487 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Groot, P., Hommersom, A., Lucas, P.J., Merk, R.J., ten Teije, A., van Harmelen, F., et al.: Using model checking for critiquing based on clinical guidelines. Artif. Intell. Med. 46(1), 19–36 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rubin, D.I., Gennari, J., Musen, M.A.: Knowledge representation and tool support for critiquing clinical trial protocols. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 724–728 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gennari, J., Musen, M.A., Fergerson, R.W., Grosso, W.E., Crubezy, M., Eriksson, H., et al.: The Evolution of Protege: An Environment for Knowledge-Based Systems Development. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 58(1), 89–123 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hammond, P., Modgil, S., Wyatt, J.C.: Safety and computer-aided design of chemotherapy plans. Top Health Inf. Manage 20(4), 55–66 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pérez-Urbina, H., Horrocks, I., Motik, B.: Efficient Query Answering for OWL 2. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 489–504. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peleg, M. et al. (2012). Reasoning with Effects of Clinical Guideline Actions Using OWL: AL Amyloidosis as a Case Study. In: Riaño, D., ten Teije, A., Miksch, S. (eds) Knowledge Representation for Health-Care. KR4HC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6924. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27697-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27697-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27696-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27697-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics