Abstract
Short term power system operation has traditionally been planned using optimization models that represent a cost minimization problem referred to as the unit commitment problem. Computational advances observed from the 1970s have made possible to solve increasingly complex and large scale formulations of this model, which usually are mixed-integer problems. More recently, the restructuring of many electricity markets in several countries has introduced competition among generators, and increased the interest in incorporating uncertainty into the unit commitment problem. Typical sources of uncertainty can be future demand, fuel prices, and unit availability. However, under competition, electricity spot price has also become an important uncertain variable, and has forced electric power generation companies to focus on operation strategies that may lead to the maximization of benefits. Short-term operation planning is not exempted from this shift and this has lead to the self-scheduling problem, where individual companies want to determine the unit commitment that would maximize their benefits. In this article, we review recent advances for the stochastic unit commitment and self-scheduling problems. After reviewing several recent modeling approaches we consider the relevance of environmental considerations, particularly CO2 emissions, and review relevant propositions for modeling and incorporating emission constraints into the unit commitment problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wood AJ, Wollenberg B (1996) Power generation, operation, and control, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Sheble GB et al (1994) Unit commitment literature synopsis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11:128–135
Padhy N (2004) Unit commitment – a bibliographical survey. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(2):1196–1205
Wang SJ, Shahidehpour SM, Kirschar DS, Mokhtari S, Irisarri GD (1995) Short-term generation scheduling with transmission and environmental constraints using an augmented Lagrangian relaxation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10:1294–1301
Gjengedal T (1996) Emission constrained unit-commitment (ECUC). IEEE Trans Energy Convers 11(1):132–138
Catalao J, Mariano S, Mendes V, Ferreira L (2005) Unit commitment with environmental considerations: a practical approach. In: 15th PSCC, Liege, 22–26 Aug 2005
Mendes VMF, Mariano SJPS, Catalao JPS, Ferreira LAFM (2004) Emission constraints on short-term schedule of thermal units. In: 39th UPEC proceedings, Bristol, Sep 2004, pp 1068–1072
Simopoulos DN, Giannakopoulos YS, Kavatza SD, Vournas CD (2006) Effect of emission constraints on short-term unit commitment. In: Proceedings of IEEE MELECON 2006, 16–19 May, Benalmádena (Malaga), pp 973–977
Takriti S, Birge JR, Long E (1996) A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11(3):1479–1508
Takriti S, Krasenbrink B, Wu LSY (2000) Incorporating fuel constraints and electricity spot prices into the stochastic unit commitment problem. Oper Res 48:268–280
Shiina T, Birge J (2004) Stochastic unit commitment problem. Int Trans Oper Res 11:19–32
Rebennack S, Flach B, Pereira MVF, Pardalos P (2011) Stochastic hydro-thermal scheduling under CO2 emissions constraints (Accepted for publication in IEEE Trans Power Syst)
Shresta GM, Song K, Goel L (2004) An efficient stochastic self-scheduling technique for power producers in the deregulated power market. Electr Power Syst Res 71:91–98
Yamin HY, Shahidehpour S (2004) Self-scheduling and energy bidding in competitive electricity markets. Electr Power Syst Res 71:203–209
Cerisola S et al (2009) Stochastic power generation unit commitment in electricity markets: a novel formulation and a comparison of solution methods. Oper Res 57(1):32–46
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prina, J. (2012). Stochastic Unit Commitment and Self-scheduling: A Review Considering CO2 Emission Modeling. In: Zheng, Q., Rebennack, S., Pardalos, P., Pereira, M., Iliadis, N. (eds) Handbook of CO₂ in Power Systems. Energy Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27431-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27431-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27430-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27431-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)