Skip to main content

Usability of Educational Computer Game (Usa_ECG): Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Conference paper
Visual Informatics: Sustaining Research and Innovations (IVIC 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7067))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Evaluation technique for Educational Computer Games (ECG) known as PHEG (consist of 5 heuristics and 37 subheuristics) was developed based on the needs to evaluate the usability of Educational Computer Games (Usa-ECG). Heuristic based concept was used in the development of PHEG. The fundamental issue of PHEG is to help evaluators in evaluating ECG in order to detect Usa-ECG through formative evaluation. At the end of the ECG development, it should be able to integrate educational elements, content, multimedia and it is playable to users with pleasant interface. PHEG was developed through the involvement of expert and verified by prominent experts. To further explore the importance of PHEG, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was performed by 15 experts from various fields. Result shows that Interface heuristic (40.8%) is selected to be the most important heuristic in evaluating Usa_ECG. The second important heuristic is educational element (25.44%) followed by Content (14.57%), Playability (11.2%) and Multimedia (8%) heuristic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barendregt, W., et al.: Identifying usability and fun problems in a computer game during first use and after some practice. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(9), 830–846 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dempsey, J.V., et al.: An exploratory study of forty computer games (COE Technical Report No 97-2). Mobile, Al. University of South Alabama (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ke, F.: Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3(4), 429 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malone, T.W.: What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems. ACM Press (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, M.J., Pountney, D.C., Baskett, M.: Using animation to support the teaching of computer game development techniques. Computers & Education 50(4), 1258–1268 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papastergiou, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education 52(1), 1–12 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen, J.a.M., Mac, R.L. (eds.) Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., Toth, J.A.: Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. In: Computer Human Interaction, CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohamed, H., Jaafar, A.: Challenges in the evaluation of educational computer games. In: 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology, ITSim (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saaty, T.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48(1), 9–26 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristics Evaluation of User Interfaces. In: Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Federoff, M.A.: Heuristics And Usability Guidelines For The Creation And Evaluation Of Fun In Video Games. Indiana University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clanton, C.: An interpreted demonstration of computer game design. In: CHI 98 Summary: Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI1998. ACM, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hannu, K., Elina, M.I.K.: Playability heuristics for mobile games. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM Press, Helsinki (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Song, S., Lee, J.: Retraction notice to Key factors of heuristic evaluation for game design: Towards massively multi-player online role-playing game. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 20(5), 391 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pinelle, D., Wong, N.: Heuristic evaluation for games: usability principles for video game design. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quinn, C.: Pragmatic evaluation: lessons from usability. In: 13th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Albion, P.: Heuristic evaluation of educational multimedia: From theory to practice. In: 16th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Brisbane (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Benson, L., Elliott, D., Grant, M., Holschuh, D., Kim, B., Kim, H., Lauber, E., Loh, S., Reeves, T.C.: Usability and Instructional Design Heuristics for E-Learning Evaluation. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Chesapeake, VA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ssemugabi, S., Villiers, R.d.: A comparative study of two usability evaluation methods using a web-based e-learning application. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Research Conference of the South African institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries, pp. 132–142. ACM, Port Elizabeth (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nokelainen, P.: An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology & Society 9(2), 178–197 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shee, D.Y., Wang, Y.-S.: Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education 50(3), 894–905 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saaty, T.: Fundamentals of decision making. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmad, F., Saman, M.Y.M., Mohamad Noor, N.M., Othman, A.: DSS for Tendering Process: Integrating Statistical Single-Criteria Model with MCDM Models. In: IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohamed Omar, H., Jaafar, A. (2011). Usability of Educational Computer Game (Usa_ECG): Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Zaman, H.B., et al. Visual Informatics: Sustaining Research and Innovations. IVIC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7067. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25200-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25200-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25199-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25200-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics