Abstract
This chapter puts forward certain advisory points arising from the results and discussions of this research. It will highlight the directions of probable future works in this perspective. The investigated strengths and weaknesses of each particular model will be challenged. Furthermore, we will review the limitations of the developed geosimulation model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Crosetto M, Tarantola S (2001) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(5):415–437
Hu Z, Lo C (2007) Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Comput, Environ Urban Syst 31(6):667–688
Johnston RJ (2000) The dictionary of human geography. Wiley, New York
Kamusoko C, Aniya M, Adi B, Manjoro M (2009) Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe—simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov—cellular automata model. Appl Geogr 29(3):435–447
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arsanjani, J.J. (2012). Conclusions and Recommendations. In: Dynamic land use/cover change modelling. Springer Theses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23705-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23705-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23704-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23705-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)