Skip to main content

On the Equivalence between the \(\mathcal{L}_1\) Action Language and Partial Actions in Transaction Logic

  • Conference paper
Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6902))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Transaction Logic with Partially Defined Actions (TR PAD) is an expressive formalism for reasoning about the effects of actions and for declarative specification of state-changing transactions. The action language \(\mathcal{L}_1\) is a well-known formalism to describe changing domains and for reasoning about actions. The purpose of this paper is to compare these two formalisms and identify their similarities and points of divergence in order to better understand their modeling and reasoning capabilities. We provide a sound reduction of a large fragment of \(\mathcal{L}_1\) to TR PAD, and show that this reduction is complete with respect to the LP embedding of \(\mathcal{L}_1\). We also explore how action planning is modeled in both languages and discuss the relationship to other languages for representing actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baral, C., Gelfond, M., Provetti, A.: Representing actions: Laws, observations and hypotheses. Journal of Logic Programming (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berardi, D., Boley, H., Grosof, B., Gruninger, M., Hull, R., Kifer, M., Martin, D., McIlraith, S., Su, J., Tabet, S.: SWSL: Semantic Web Services Language. Technical report, Semantic Web Services Initiative (April 2005), http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWSF-SWSL/

  3. Bonner, A.J., Kifer, M.: Transaction logic programming (or a logic of declarative and procedural knowledge). Technical Report CSRI-323, University of Toronto (November 1995), http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~kifer/TechReports/transaction-logic.pdf

  4. Bonner, A.J., Kifer, M.: A logic for programming database transactions. In: Chomicki, J., Saake, G. (eds.) Logics for Databases and Information Systems. ch.5, pp. 117–166. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (March 1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Representing action and change by logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming 17, 301–322 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Giunchiglia, E., Lifschitz, V.: An action language based on causal explanation: Preliminary report. In: Proc. AAAI 1998, pp. 623–630. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Inclezan, D.: Modular action language ALM. In: Hill, P.M., Warren, D.S. (eds.) ICLP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5649, pp. 542–543. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kifer, M., Lara, R., Polleres, A., Zhao, C., Keller, U., Lausen, H., Fensel, D.: A logical framework for web service discovery. In: ISWC 2004 Semantic Web Services Workshop. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (November 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lam, P.E., Mitchell, J.C., Sundaram, S.: A formalization of HIPAA for a medical messaging system. In: Fischer-Hübner, S., Lambrinoudakis, C., Pernul, G. (eds.) TrustBus 2009. LNCS, vol. 5695, pp. 73–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearce, D., Wagner, G.: Logic programming with strong negation. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Extensions of Logic Programming, pp. 311–326. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Rezk, M., Kifer, M.: On the equivalence between the L1 action language and partial actions in transaction logic (2011), http://www.inf.unibz.it/~mrezk/techreportTRL1.pdf

  12. Rezk, M., Kifer, M.: Reasoning with actions in transaction logic (2011), http://www.inf.unibz.it/~mrezk/techreportPAD.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rezk, M., Kifer, M. (2011). On the Equivalence between the \(\mathcal{L}_1\) Action Language and Partial Actions in Transaction Logic. In: Rudolph, S., Gutierrez, C. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6902. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23580-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23580-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23579-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23580-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics