Abstract
Dam projects generate a vast array of economic impacts—both in the region where they are located, and at inter-regional, national and even global levels. These impacts are generally evaluated in terms of additional output of agricultural commodities, hydropower, navigation, fishing, tourism, recreation, prevention of droughts and reduction in flood damages, and are referred to as direct impacts.
This chapter is based on a larger study on the subject sponsored by the World Bank and carried out by a number of researchers. For details see Ramesh Bhatia, Rita Cestti, Monica Scatasta and R.P.S. Malik (eds), Indirect Economic Impacts of Dams: Case Studies from India, Egypt and Brazil, Academic Foundation, New Delhi and World Bank, 2008.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Semi-input-output (S-I/O) models represent a variant of I/O models whereby a distinction is made between tradable and non-tradable goods. The former are assumed to have an exogenously set domestic level of output, so that any change in demand will be reflected in a change in exported quantities. In terms of domestic production, therefore, the whole brunt of demand shocks is borne by non-tradable goods. The implication of this distinction is that induced, consumption-based impacts will reverberate throughout the economy only via adjustments in non-tradable goods and their inter-industry linkages. This characterisation is important, in that it refines the representation of the specific regional structure of production, reducing the risk of overestimating induced impacts that are not felt by regional sectors.
- 2.
A Social accounting matrix can feed into a standard CGE model.
- 3.
A feddan is equal to 1.038 acres.
- 4.
It refers to regional development districts.
References
Adelman I, Robinson S (1978) Income distribution policy in developing countries. Stanford University Press, Los Angeles
Aylward B, Berkhoff J, Green C, Gutman P, Lagman A, Manion M, Markandya A, McKenney B, Naudascher-Jankowski K, Oud B, Penman A, Porter S, Rajapakse C, Southgate D, Unsworth R (2000) Financial, economic and distributional analysis. Thematic review III.1. Prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams, Cape Town. Available at www.dams.org
Bell C, Hazell P, Slade R (1982) The project evaluation in regional perspective: a study of an irrigation project in Northern Malaysia. Econ J 9(372):959–961
Bhalla GS, Chadha GK, Kashyap SP, Sharma RK (1990) Agricultural growth and structural changes in the Punjab economy: an input-output analysis. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC
Bhatia R, Cestti R, Scatasta M, Malik RPS (eds) (2008) Indirect economic impacts of dams: case studies from India, Egypt and Brazil. Academic Foundation for World Bank, New Delhi
de Janvry A, Sadoulet E (2001) World poverty and the role of agricultural technology: direct and indirect effects. J Dev Studies 38(4):1–26
Dervis K, Demelo J, Robinson S (1982) General equilibrium models for development policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Haggblade S, Hammer J, Hazell P (1991) Modeling agricultural growth multipliers. Am J Agric Econ 73(2):361–374
Hazell PBR, Ramasamy C (1991) The Green Revolution reconsidered: the impact of high-yielding rice varieties in South India. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Hewings GJD (1985) Regional input-output analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills
Hoffman S, Robinson S, Subramanian S (1996) The role of defense cuts in the California Recession: computable general equilibrium models and interstate factor mobility. J Reg Sci 36(4):571–595
Leontief W (1953) Studies in the structure of the American economy. Oxford University Press, New York
Leontief W (1970) The dynamic inverse. In: Carter AP, Brody A (eds) Contribution of input-output analysis. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 17–46
Nishizawa T, Uitto JI (1995) The fragile tropics of Latin America: sustainable management of changing environments. United Nations University Press, Tokyo
Robinson S (1989) Multisectoral models. In: Chenery H, Srinivasan TN (eds) Handbook of development economics. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 886–935
Rodrigues L (2001) Potencial da Agricultura Irrigada como Indutora do Desenvolvimento Regional: o Caso do Projeto JaĂba no Norte de Minas Gerais. Rev Econ Nordeste 32(2):206–232
Taylor L, Bacha EL, Cardoso EA, Lysy FJ (1980) Models of growth and distribution for Brazil. Oxford University Press, New York
Vergolino TB, Vergolino JR (1997) Reforma do Estado: Efeitos sobre a Renda e o Emprego na região do Sub-Médio São Francisco (Petrolina/Juazeiro). Rev Econ Nordeste 28:447–459, No. Especial: Economia Agricola, Recursos Naturais e Meio Ambiente
WCD (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. The report of the World Commission on Dams, issued on November 16, 2000. Available at www.dams.org/report
World Bank (1996) The World Bank’s experience with large dams: a preliminary review of impacts. Operations Evaluation Department Report No. 15815. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cestti, R., Malik, R.P.S. (2012). Indirect Economic Impacts of Dams. In: Tortajada, C., Altinbilek, D., Biswas, A. (eds) Impacts of Large Dams: A Global Assessment. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23571-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23571-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23570-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23571-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)