Skip to main content

Towards Responsible Hydropower Development through Contentious Multi-stakeholder Negotiations: The Case of India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution of Dam Policies

Abstract

This chapter explores reforms in environmental and resettlement policies in India and the influence of domestic and external actors on the reform process. It also analyses the ways in which environment and resettlement policies have been implemented in a number of hydropower projects. At macro level, the study begins by describing the multilevel processes that govern dam decision-making. It then considers changes regarding environmental clearance and resettlement, and the role which state and non-state actors played in the last three decades. At project level the analysis focuses on how state and non-state actors influence decision-making on the introduction of superior environmental and social standards through changes in policies and laws. The dam projects selected are the Allain Duhangan Project, the Lower Subansiri Project and the Dibang Multipurpose Project. The study argues that, at macro level, it is civil society which has been the major driver of change in the area of resettlement over the last three decades. In the environment arena the changes are the outcome of competing demands from civil society and growth-oriented ministries and departments of the Government of India. At project level, superior social and environmental standards are primarily driven by social movements. International actors like the International Finance Corporation also catalyse the reform process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Planning Commission is an apex planning body.

  2. 2.

    http://www.nhpcindia.com/English/Scripts/Hydro_Initiative.aspx. Accessed 6 Aug 2010.

  3. 3.

    Personal interview with a senior official in the power department in one of these states.

  4. 4.

    The committee’s terms of reference included reviewing policy and programmes with significant environmental implications, advising government, departments and industry on mitigation measures, reviewing existing environmental legislation, regulation and administration, proposing cost-effective solutions to environmental problems, ensuring coordination between the environment and economic policies, promoting research on environmental problems and establishing research facilities wherever possible, increasing public awareness and cooperating with the UN and other international agencies in environmental programmes with global concerns (EPW Correspondent 1972b).

  5. 5.

    For more information on Narmada, see Wood (2007), Dwivedi (2006) and Khagram (2004).

  6. 6.

    For international mobilisation, see McCully (2001), Khagram (2004), for domestic social mobilisation, see Fernandes (2008), Iyer (2007).

  7. 7.

    The Dibang Multipurpose Project had a site clearance based on the EIA Notification 1994. When the Government of India produced the 2006 EIA Notification, it set a period of 2 years (until September 2008) within which the project would be appraised under the 1994 EIA Notification if submitted to the MoEF. As the sustained local community agitation prevented the second obligatory public hearing in the Dibang Valley from being held by September 2008, it was decided at the EAC’s 27th meeting in June 2009 that the Dibang Project would have to reapply for the EIA study under the 2006 EIA Notification and also to hold fresh public hearings in the two districts. Thus the public hearing in the Lower Dibang Valley district was considered null and void under the new directions.

  8. 8.

    This term was coined by R. Ramaswamy Iyer during the Sixth Dialogue on Water held in Bonn in September 2009.

References

  • AASU (All Assam Student Union) (2008) Pratwabhan 6th annual Gogamukh conference by All Assam Student Union Dhemaji District, 19–21 Nov 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • ADHPL (Allain Duhangan Hydroelectric Project Ltd.) (2004) Affidavit of Allain Duhangan Hydroelectric Project, 7 May 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruah S (2012) Whose river is it anyway? Political economy of hydropower in the Eastern Himalayas. Economic and Political Weekly 47(29):41–52, 21 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Borpujari P (2012) Damning the dam protestors. http://priyanka-borpujari.blogspot.in/2012/05/damning-dam-protesters.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2012

  • Cernea MM (2006) Resettlement management. Denying or confronting risks. In: Mathur HM (ed) Managing resettlement in India. Approaches, issues, experiences. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatradhar KC (2009) Lower Subansiri: downstream impact chronology. Unpublished document

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Writ Petition (2007) Himachal Pradesh High Court CWP 1421 of 2007, 11 Sept 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (2004) Assessment report. Complaint regarding Allain Duhangan Hydropower Project Himachal Pradesh. India office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman International Finance Corporation Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, March 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (2006) Progress report. Complaint regarding the Allain Duhangan Hydropower Project Himachal Pradesh. India office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman International Finance Corporation Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 28 August 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (2008) Allain Duhangan Hydro Power Project. India Complaint Conclusion Report Office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman International Finance Corporation Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, March 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Correspondent (2004) Clearance to hydel project opposed. Tribune News Service, 18 May 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Monte D (1986) A dam too far. Economic and Political Weekly 19(47), 24 Nov 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi R (2006) Conflict and collective action: the Sardar Sarovar Project in India. Routledge, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • EPW Correspondent (1972a) Environmental planning. What a committee can’t do. Economic and Political Weekly 7(18), 29 April 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • EPW Correspondent (1972b) Development and environment. Economic and Political Weekly 7(25), 17 June 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • EPW Editorial (1987) Format for environment. Economic and Political Weekly 23(18), 2 May 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes W (2004) Rehabilitation policy for the displaced. Economic and Political Weekly 39(12):1191–1193, 20 March

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes W (2008) The 2006 rehabilitation draft: more of the same?. Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group, Kolkata

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes W, Paranjpye V (eds) (1997) Rehabilitation policy and law in India: a right to livelihood. Indian Social Institute, Pune. Econet, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox JA, Brown LD (eds) (1998) The struggle for accountability: the world. NGOs and grassroots movements. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh P (2008) Public hearing: a mere formality? Livemint.com. Wall Street J. http://www.livemint.com/2008/02/11003825/Public-hearing-a-mere-formali.html. Accessed 26 July 2010

  • GoI (Government of India) Ministry of Water Resources (2001) Letter 2/WCD/2001/DT (PR) III (2)

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI (Government of India) Central Electricity Authority (2008) Status of hydro electric potential development CEA, August 2008. http://www.cea.nic.in/hydro/Status%20of%20Hydroelectric%20Potential%20Development.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2008

  • GoI (Government of India) Ministry of Finance (2008) Expert group to examine the schemes of statutory clearances for industrial and infrastructure projects in India, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/Report%20Ministry%20of%20Finance.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2009

  • Guha R (2007) India after Gandhi. The history of the world’s largest democracy. Picador Publications, India

    Google Scholar 

  • International Rivers (2004a) http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/893. Accessed 2 Sept 2009

  • International Rivers (2004b) http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/south-asia/india/affected-people-world-bank-regarding-allain-duhangan-hydro-project. Accessed 2 Sept 2009

  • International Rivers (2004c) http://internationalrivers.org/en/south-asia/india/independent-observer-world-bank-regarding-allain-duhangan-project. Accessed 31 Dec 2008

  • Iyer RR (2003) Water perspectives issues concerns. Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer RR (2007) Towards a just displacement and rehabilitation policy. Economic and Political Weekly 42(30):3103–3107, 29 July 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Khagram S (2004) Dams and development. Transnational struggles for water and power. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingensmith D (2007) One valley and a thousand. Dams nationalism and development. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudgal S (1991) Environmental impacts of water resources development projects. Central Board of Irrigation and Power: environmental impact assessment for water resources projects, Proceedings of regional workshops. Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • McCully P (2001) The use of a trilateral network: an activists’ perspective on the formation of the World Commission on Dams. Am Univ Int Law Rev 16(6):1453–1475

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon M, Kohli K (2005) Large dams for hydropower in North East India. A dossier. Kalpavriksh and South Asia Network of Dams Rivers and People, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon M (2007) Kohli K (2007) Environmental decision-making: whose agenda? Economic and Political Weekly 42(26):30

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon M, Kohli K (2008) Reengineering the legal and policy regimes on environment. Economic and Political Weekly 43(23):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon M, Kohli K (2009) From impact assessment to clearance manufacture. Economic and Political Weekly XLIV 28:20–23, 30 June 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D (1991) Need for environmental impact assessment. Central Board of Irrigation and Power: environmental impact assessment for water resources projects, Proceedings of regional workshops, Ministry of Environment and Forests, pp 16–17, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty B (2005) Displacement and rehabilitation of tribals. Economic and Political Weekly 40(13):1318–1320, 26 March 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A (2002) Cabinet secy for implementing panel report on investments. Business Line, 12 Dec 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandimath OV (2009) Oxford handbook of environmental decision making in India: an EIA model. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • National Productivity Council (2010.) Executive summary of EIA and EMP of Dibang Multipurpose Project. http://envfor.nic.in/divisions/iass/Executive%20Summary_English.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2009

  • NCIWRD (National Commission for Integrated Water Resource Development) (1999) Integrated water resource development: a plan for action. Report of the National Commission for Integrated Water Resource Development (NCIWRD) I

    Google Scholar 

  • NHPC (National Hydroelectric Power Corporation) Ltd (2002) Executive summary of Subansiri lower hydroelectric project Arunachal Pradesh and Assam (8 × 250 MW)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangacheri R et al (2000) Large dams: India’s experience. A WCD case study prepared for World Commission of Dams. Cape Town, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy A (1999) The greater common good. India Book Distributor, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy D (2008) Hydropower in Uttarakhand: is ‘development’ the real objective? Economic and Political Weekly 43(41):19, 11 Oct 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs I (1971) Environmental quality management and development planning. Economic and Political Weekly 6(30), 6 Nov 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldanha LF et al (2007) Green tapism. A review of the Environmental Impact Notification 2006. Environment Support Group, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta N (2000) A brief review. In: Rangachari R et al (2000) Large dams: India’s experience. A WCD case study prepared for World Commission of Dams. Cape Town, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah Z, Kumar MD (2008) In the midst of the large dam controversy: objectives, criteria for assessing large water storages in the developing world. Water Res Manage 22(12):1799–1824. doi:10.1007/s11269_008_9254_8

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S (2006) Displacement and rehabilitation. A comparison of two policy drafts. Economic and Political Weekly 41(52):5307–5309, 30 December 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute) (2006) National energy map of India: technology vision 2030. The Energy and Resources Institute and Office of the Principal Scientific Advisor Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Vagholikar N, Ahmed MF (2003) Tracking a hydel project. The story of lower Subansiri. The Ecologist Asia (11)1:25–32, January–March 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Veracity (2008) Protest over Dibang project hits the media around the globe: is environmental clearance a mere formality? Veracity, 10 February 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • WCD (World Commission of Dams) (2000) Dams and development. A new framework for decision making. EarthScan publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JR (2007) The politics of water resource development in India: the Narmada dams controversy. Sage Publications Pvt Ltd, New Dehli

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2004) Implementation completion report (IDA 29300) No. 28942. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/06/14/000012009_20050614163544/Rendered/PDF/289420rev.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept. 2009

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the generous support of International Postgraduate Studies in Water Technologies (IPSWaT) for supporting the field research for this study. The author would like to thank Parthojyoti Das, Keshab Chatradhar, Tony Mikrows and Sunder Mahant for their help during the fieldwork. The author would also like to thank the many resource persons in India, who have enormously helped the author in developing a better understanding of environmental governance in India. Author acknowledges the help of Saptarshi Dey in creating a map depicting the study locations.The author would also like to thank Ramaswamy R. Iyer and Peter Mollinga for their comments on an earlier extended version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirmalya Choudhury .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Choudhury, N. (2014). Towards Responsible Hydropower Development through Contentious Multi-stakeholder Negotiations: The Case of India. In: Scheumann, W., Hensengerth, O. (eds) Evolution of Dam Policies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23403-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics