Skip to main content

Probabilistic Action and Deontic Logic

(Invited Talk)

  • Conference paper
Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6814))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 538 Accesses

Abstract

Deontic logic aims at formally modeling the reasoning with norm-related modalities. Von Wright recognized that the obligation modality bears a resemblance to modal necessity and the permission modality to modal possibility, which resulted in his Standard Deontic Logic [9]. SDL is the modal logic KD. Since its conception, SDL has drawn a lot of criticism: e.g., Chisholm [2] argued that it was unfit to represent certain types of conditional obligation, and Makinson [5] and van der Torre [6] emphasized that deontic logic is much more naturally studied as a process of iterative detachment relative to explicitly represented normative systems; a view that does not fit well with the modal logic modeling proposed by Von Wright.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Broersen, J.: Modeling attempt and action failure in probabilistic stit logic. In: Proceedings of Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chisholm, R.M.: Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis 24, 33–36 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harel, A., Porat, A.: Aggregating probabilities across cases: Responsibility for unspecified offences. Minnesota Law Review 94, 261–310 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lorini, E., Herzig, A.: A logic of intention and attempt. Synthese 163(1), 45–77 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Makinson, D.: On a fundamental problem of deontic logic. In: McNamara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems. New Studies on Deontic Logic and Computer Science, pp. 29–53. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Makinson, D., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Input-output logics. Journal of Philosphical Logic 29, 383–408 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Placek, T.: On attempting. In: Logica Yearbook 2009, pp. 155–161. College Publications, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vanderveken, D.: Attempt, success and action generation: A logical study of intentional action. In: Vanderveken, D. (ed.) Logic, Thought and Action, pp. 316–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. von Wright, G.H.: Deontic logic. Mind 60, 1–15 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yaffe, G.: Attempts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Broersen, J. (2011). Probabilistic Action and Deontic Logic. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P., Ã…gotnes, T., Boella, G., van der Torre, L. (eds) Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. CLIMA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6814. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22359-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22359-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22358-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22359-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics