Skip to main content

Minimalist Tree Languages Are Closed Under Intersection with Recognizable Tree Languages

  • Conference paper
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics (LACL 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6736))

Abstract

Minimalist grammars are a mildly context-sensitive grammar framework within which analyses in mainstream chomskyian syntax can be faithfully represented. Here it is shown that both the derivation tree languages and derived tree languages of minimalist grammars are closed under intersection with regular tree languages. This allows us to conclude that taking into account the possibility of ‘semantic crashes’ in the standard approach to interpreting minimalist structures does not alter the strong generative capacity of the formalism. In addition, the addition to minimalist grammars of complexity filters is easily shown using a similar proof method to not change the class of derived tree languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stabler, E.P.: Derivational minimalism. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1328, pp. 68–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Thatcher, J.W.: Characterizing derivation trees of context-free grammars through a generalization of finite automata theory. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 1(4), 317–322 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Koopman, H.: On restricting recursion and the form of syntactic representations. In: Speas, P., Roeper, T. (eds.) Recursion. Oxford University Press, Oxford (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heim, I., Kratzer, A.: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kobele, G.M., Retoré, C., Salvati, S.: An automata theoretic approach to minimalism. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds. Proceedings of the Workshop Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10, ESSLLI 2007, Dublin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michaelis, J.: On Formal Properties of Minimalist Grammars. PhD thesis, Universität Potsdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raoult, J.C.: Rational tree relations. Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society 4, 149–176 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Courcelle, B.: Monadic second-order definable graph transductions: a survey. Theoretical Computer Science 126, 53–75 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobele, G.M.: Formalizing mirror theory. Grammars 5(3), 177–221 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Engelfriet, J.: Context-free graph grammars. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages. Beyond Words, vol. 3, pp. 125–213. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lang, B.: Recognition can be harder than parsing. Computational Intelligence 10(4), 486–494 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Graf, T.: A tree transducer model of reference-set computation. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 15, 1–53 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kobele, G.M.: Generating Copies: An investigation into structural identity in language and grammar. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koopman, H., Szabolcsi, A.: Verbal Complexes. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kayne, R.: The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koopman, H.: Derivations and complexity filters. In: Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., Barbiers, S., Gärtner, H.M. (eds.) Dimensions of Movement: From features to remnants. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, vol. 48, pp. 151–188. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Halle, M., Marantz, A.: Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: Hale, K., Keyser, S.J. (eds.) The View from Building 20, pp. 111–176. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mönnich, U.: Minimalist syntax, multiple regular tree grammars and direction preserving tree transductions. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10, ESSLLI 2007, Dublin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Engelfriet, J., Heyker, L.: The string generating power of context-free hypergraph grammars. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 43, 328–360 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Morawietz, F., Cornell, T.: The MSO logic-automaton connection in linguistics. In: Lecomte, A., Lamarche, F., Perrier, G. (eds.) LACL 1997. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1582, pp. 112–131. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kobele, G.M. (2011). Minimalist Tree Languages Are Closed Under Intersection with Recognizable Tree Languages. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, JP. (eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6736. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22220-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22221-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics