Skip to main content

Interpretation of Loss Aversion in Kano’s Quality Model

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Decision Technologies

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 10))

Abstract

For designing and developing products/services it is vital to know the relevancy of the performance generated by each technical attribute and how they can increase customer satisfaction. Improving the parameters of technical attributes requires financial resources, and the budgets are generally limited. Thus the optimum target can be the achievement of the minimum overall cost for a given satisfaction level. Kano’s quality model classifies the relationships between customer satisfaction and attribute-level performance and indicates that some of the attributes have a non-linear relationship to satisfaction, rather power-function should be used. For the customers’ subjective evaluation these relationships are not deterministic and are uncertain. Also the cost function are uncertain, where the loss aversion of decision makers should be considered as well. This paper proposes a method for fuzzy extension of Kano’s model and presents numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balázs, K., Botzheim, J., Kóczy, L.T.: Comparative investigation of various evolutionary and memetic algorithms. In: Rudas, I.J., Fodor, J., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Computational Intelligence in Engineering. SCI, vol. 313, pp. 129–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bode, J., Fung, R.Y.K.: Cost engineering with quality function deployment. Computers and Industrial Engineering 35, 587–590 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Botzheim, J., Földesi, P.: Parametric representation of fuzzy power function for decision-making processes. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Management Engineering, ISME 2010, Kitakyushu, Japan, pp. 248–255 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botzheim, J., Drobics, M., Kóczy, L.T.: Feature selection using bacterial optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, IPMU 2004, Perugia, Italy, pp. 797–804 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Botzheim, J., Cabrita, C., Kóczy, L.T., Ruano, A.E.: Fuzzy rule extraction by bacterial memetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of International Fuzzy Systems Association, IFSA 2005, Beijing, China, pp. 1563–1568 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, L., Weng, M.C.: An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models. European Journal of Operational Research 172, 230–248 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Conklin, M., Powaga, K., Lipovetsky, S.: Customer satisfaction analysis: Identification of key drivers. European Journal of Operational Research 154, 819–827 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Földesi, P., Botzheim, J.: Modeling of loss aversion in solving fuzzy road transport traveling salesman problem using eugenic bacterial memetic algorithm. Memetic Computing 2(4), 259–271 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hauser, J.R., Clausing, D.: The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 63–73 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control 14(2), 39–48 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levenberg, K.: A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quart. Appl. Math. 2(2), 164–168 (1944)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Luh, G.C., Lee, S.W.: A bacterial evolutionary algorithm for the job shop scheduling problem. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers 23(3), 185–191 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marquardt, D.: An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 11(2), 431–441 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H.H.: How to make product development projects more successful by integrating kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 18, 25–38 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matzler, K., Bailom, F., Hinterhuber, H.H., Renzl, B., Pichler, J.: The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis. Industrial Marketing Management 33, 271–277 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moscato, P.: On evolution, search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: Towards memetic algorithms. Tech. Rep. Caltech Concurrent Computation Program, Report. 826, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moskowitz, H., Kim, K.J.: QFD optimizer: A novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs. Computers and Industrial Engineering 32, 641–655 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nawa, N.E., Furuhashi, T.: Fuzzy system parameters discovery by bacterial evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 7(5), 608–616 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang, J., Fung, R.Y.K., Xu, B., Wang, D.: A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration. Computers & Operations research 29, 1447–1463 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou, M.: Fuzzy logic and optimization models for implementing QFD. Computers and Industrial Engineering 35, 237–240 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Földesi, P., Botzheim, J. (2011). Interpretation of Loss Aversion in Kano’s Quality Model. In: Watada, J., Phillips-Wren, G., Jain, L.C., Howlett, R.J. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22194-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22194-1_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22193-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22194-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics