Skip to main content

Optimal Weights for Multi-atlas Label Fusion

  • Conference paper
Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6801))

Abstract

Multi-atlas based segmentation has been applied widely in medical image analysis. For label fusion, previous studies show that image similarity-based local weighting techniques produce the most accurate results. However, these methods ignore the correlations between results produced by different atlases. Furthermore, they rely on pre-selected weighting models and ad hoc methods to choose model parameters. We propose a novel label fusion method to address these limitations. Our formulation directly aims at reducing the expectation of the combined error and can be efficiently solved in a closed form. In our hippocampus segmentation experiment, our method significantly outperforms similarity-based local weighting. Using 20 atlases, we produce results with 0.898±0.019 Dice overlap to manual labelings for controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allassonniere, S., Amit, Y., Trouve, A.: Towards a coherent statistical framework for dense deformable template estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 69(1), 3–29 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Artaechevarria, X., Munoz-Barrutia, A., Ortiz-de-Solorzano, C.: Combination strategies in multi-atlas image segmentation: Application to brain MR data. IEEE Tran. Medical Imaging 28(8), 1266–1277 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avants, B., Epstein, C., Grossman, M., Gee, J.: Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Medical Image Analysis 12, 26–41 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, D., Pruessner, J.: Towards accurate, automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and amygdala from MRI by augmenting ANIMAL with a template library and label fusion. NeuroImage 52(4), 1355–1366 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coupé, P., Manjón, J.V., Fonov, V., Pruessner, J., Robles, M., Collins, D.L.: Nonlocal patch-based label fusion for hippocampus segmentation. In: Jiang, T., Navab, N., Pluim, J.P.W., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6363, pp. 129–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen, L.K., Salamon, P.: Neural network ensembles. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12(10), 993–1001 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasboun, D., Chantome, M., Zouaoui, A., Sahel, M., Deladoeuille, M., Sourour, N., Duymes, M., Baulac, M., Marsault, C., Dormont, D.: MR determination of hippocampal volume: Comparison of three methods. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 17, 1091–1098 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joshi, S., Davis, B., Jomier, M., Gerig, G.: Unbiased diffeomorphism atlas construction for computational anatomy. NeuroImage 23, 151–160 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kittler, J.: Combining classifiers: A theoretical framework. Pattern Analysis and Application 1, 18–27 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leung, K., Barnes, J., Ridgway, G., Bartlett, J., Clarkson, M., Macdonald, K., Schuff, N., Fox, N., Ourselin, S.: Automated cross-sectional and longitudinal hippocampal volume measurement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease. NeuroImage 51, 1345–1359 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murty, K.G.: Linear Complementarity, Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Helderman-Verlag (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pluta, J., Avants, B., Glynn, S., Awate, S., Gee, J., Detre, J.: Appearance and incomplete label matching for diffeomorphic template based hippocampus segmentation. Hippocampus 19, 565–571 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., Maurer, C.: Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage 21(4), 1428–1442 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sabuncu, M., Yeo, B., Leemput, K.V., Fischl, B., Golland, P.: A generative model for image segmentation based on label fusion. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 29(10), 1714–1720 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scahill, R., Schott, J., Stevens, J., Fox, M.R.N.: Mapping the evolution of regional atrophy in Alzheimer’s Disease: unbiased analysis of fluidregistered serial MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99(7), 4703–4707 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Warfield, S., Zou, K., Wells, W.: Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 23(7), 903–921 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, H., Suh, J.W., Pluta, J., Altinay, M., Yushkevich, P. (2011). Optimal Weights for Multi-atlas Label Fusion. In: Székely, G., Hahn, H.K. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6801. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22091-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22092-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics