Abstract
Based on the assumption that the ultra-high frequencies of thes gravity field are produced by the topography variations, we compute the omission errors by using 3 arc-second elevation data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). It is shown that the maximum omission errors to the geoid are in the range of dm, cm and sub-cm level for grid sizes of 5′′, 2′′ and 1′′ over the contiguous United States (CONUS), respectively. The results suggest that a 1 arc-minute grid size is sufficient for the 1-cm geoid, even for areas with very rough topography. The results also show that the omission errors to gravity are significant even for 1′′ grid size, at which the smoothed-out gravity still reaches tens of mGals. The omission errors to gravity at a 5′′ grid size peaks above 100 mGals, demonstrating the importance of correction of residual terrain to gravity observations in data gridding or block mean value computations.The results are also compared with those based on Kaula s rule. While the omission errors based on Kaula’s rule are ± 0. 5 and ± 3. 0 cm for 1′′ and 5′′ grid size, respectively, the RMS values of the omission error in this paper are ± 0. 1 and ± 1. 1 cm. The differences suggest Kaula s rule may overestimate the power of the gravity field at the ultra-high frequency band, which renders the convergence studies of the spherical harmonic series based on Kaula’s rule questionable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Forsberg R (1984) A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modeling. Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying. Report No. 355, Ohio State University, 1984
Jekeli C (2009) Omission error, data requirements, and the fractal dimension of the geoid. Proceedings of Hotine-Marussi Symposium 2009, in press
Heck B (2003) On Helmert’s methods of condensation. J Geodes 77:155–170
Martinec Z (1998) Boundary-value problems for gravimetric determination of precise geoid. Lecture notes in Earth Sciences 73. Springer Berlin
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2008) An Earth gravitational model to degree 2,160: EGM2008. Presented at the 2008 General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union, Vienna, Austria, 13–18 April 2008
Sjöberg LE, Nahavandchi H (1999) On the indirect effect in the Stokes–Helmert method of geoid determination. J Geodes 73(2):87–93
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, Y.M. (2012). On the Omission Errors Due to Limited Grid Size in Geoid Computations. In: Sneeuw, N., Novák, P., Crespi, M., Sansò, F. (eds) VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22078-4_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22078-4_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22077-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22078-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)