Abstract
Nearly all design work is collaborative work. The phenomenon of the “design team” is increasingly common in both industry and project-based education. Existing organizational behavior research has shown that diversity on a team has mixed and frequently negative effects, particularly when outward indicators such as gender, ethnicity, age and experience measure diversity. However, relatively little research has been conducted on the problem solving capabilities and preferences of individual team members, or “team cognitive diversity.” This study examines 14 measures of cognitive diversity and 3 measures of project performance for 15 design teams comprised of 97 masters-level engineering students from nine universities in eight countries who collaborated over a period of 8 months. We find that students with similar backgrounds and experience level reveal a wide variety of cognitive problem solving preferences.
We also find that overall cognitive diversity does not appear to correlate with overall team project performance. However, team project performance positively correlates with team level “social sensitivity,” the cognitive ability to relate to other team members problem solving preferences. Finally, cognitive diversity does not correlate with either individual and team level satisfaction, indicating that cognitive differences may be successfully accommodated over the life of the project. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Dr. Rich Shavelson is principle investigator of this project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mannix E, Neale MA. What Differences Make a Difference? Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2005;6(2):31.
Van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC. Work group diversity. Psychology. 2007;58.
Baer M, Oldham G, Jacobsohn G, Hollingshead A. The Personality Composition of Teams and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Team Creative Confidence. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2008 Dec 1;42(4):255-282.
Woolley AW, Gerbasi ME, Chabris CF, Kosslyn SM, Hackman JR. Bringing in the experts: How team composition and work strategy jointly shape analytic effectiveness. Small Group Research. 2008;39(3):352–371.
Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW. Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science. 2010 Oct 1;:6.
Messick S. The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist. 1984;19(2):59–74.
Kozhevnikov M. Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin. 2007;133(3):464.
Cronin MA, Weingart LR. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review. 2007;32(3):761-773.
Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC. Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin. 1953;50(6):456–473.
Kirton MJ. Adaption-innovation: In the context of diversity and change. Psychology Press; 2003.
Burke RJ, Weir T. Coping with the stress of managerial occupations. In: Current Concerns in Organisational Stress. London: Wiley; 1980.
Kochan T, Bezrukova K, Ely R, Jackson S, Joshi A, Jehn K, et al. The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human resource management. 2003;42(1):3–21.
Blau PM. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press New York; 1977.
Wilde DJ. Teamology: The Construction and Organization of Effective Teams. Springer Verlag; 2008.
Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative science quarterly. 1999;44(1):1–3.
Coffield F. Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning a systematic and critical review. London :: Learning and Skills Research Centre,; 2004.
Kirton MJ. Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1976 Oct;61(5):622-629.
McCrae RR, John OP. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of personality. 1992;60(2):175–215.
Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality. 2003;37(6):504–528.
Herrmann N. The Creative Brain. Revised. Lake Lure, NC: Ned Herrmann Group, The; 1989.
Herrmann N. The whole brain business book. McGraw-Hill Professional; 1996.
Bunderson CV. The validity of the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument. Creative brain. Lake Lure, NC: Brain Books. 1989;
Wilde D. Personalities Into Teams. Mechanical Engineering: The Magazine of ASME [Internet]. 2010 Feb;Available from: http://memagazine.asme.org/Articles/2010/February/Personalities_Into_Teams.cfm
Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly. 1999;44(2):350–383.
Hackman JR. Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business Press; 2002.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the generous support of the Hasso Plattner Design Thinking Research Program for making this research possible. Also, we would like to earnestly thank the students who spent a good amount of their valuable time to complete our surveys, as well as the international teaching team for granting us access to their courses and students and facilitating data collection. We would also like to thank Rich Shavelson for his invaluable perspective and guidance, Pam Hinds for her extensive insight into groups and teams, and Jon Shemwell for assisting with statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kress, G.L., Schar, M. (2012). Teamology – The Art and Science of Design Team Formation. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds) Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21642-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21643-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)