Skip to main content

Incremental Algorithm for Hierarchical Minimum Spanning Forests and Saliency of Watershed Cuts

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Morphology and Its Applications to Image and Signal Processing (ISMM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6671))

Abstract

We study hierarchical segmentations that are optimal in the sense of minimal spanning forests of the original image. We introduce a region-merging operation called uprooting, and we prove that optimal hierarchical segmentations are equivalent to the ones given by uprooting a watershed-cut based segmentation. Based on those theoretical results, we propose an efficient algorithm to compute such hierarchies, as well as the first saliency map algorithm compatible with the morphological filtering framework.

This work received funding from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, contract ANR-2010-BLAN-0205-01.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allène, C., Audibert, J.-Y., Couprie, M., Keriven, R.: Some links between extremum spanning forests, watersheds and min-cuts. IVC 28(10), 1460–1471 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arbeláez, P.A., Cohen, L.D.: A metric approach to vector-valued image segmentation. IJCV 69(1), 119–126 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Audigier, R., Lotufo, R.: Seed-relative segmentation robustness of watershed and fuzzy connectedness approaches. In: IEEE SIBGRAPI 2007, pp. 61–70 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bender, M.A., Farach-Colton, M.: The LCA problem revisited. In: Latin American Theoretical Informatics, pp. 88–94 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beucher, S.: Watershed, hierarchical segmentation and waterfall algorithm. In: ISMM 1994, pp. 69–76 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Couprie, C., Grady, L., Najman, L., Talbot, H.: Power Watersheds: A Unifying Graph Based Optimization Framework. PAMI (to appear, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Couprie, M., Najman, L., Bertrand, G.: Quasi-linear algorithms for the topological watershed. JMIV 22(2-3), 231–249 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cousty, J., Najman, L., Serra, J.: Raising in watershed lattices. In: 15th IEEE ICIP 2008, pp. 2196–2199 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cousty, J., Bertrand, G., Najman, L., Couprie, M.: Watershed Cuts: Minimum Spanning Forests and the Drop of Water Principle. PAMI 31(8), 1362–1374 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cousty, J., Bertrand, G., Najman, L., Couprie, M.: Watershed cuts: thinnings, shortest-path forests and topological watersheds. PAMI 32(5), 925–939 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cousty, J., Najman, L., Bertrand, G., Couprie, M.: Weighted fusion graphs: merging properties and watersheds. DAM 156(15 ), 3011–3027 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cousty, J., Najman, L., Serra, J.: Some morphological operators in graph spaces. In: Wilkinson, M.H.F., Roerdink, J.B.T.M. (eds.) ISMM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5720, pp. 149–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Felzenszwalb, P., Huttenlocher, D.: Efficient graph-based image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision 59, 167–181 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fredman, M.L., Tarjan, R.E.: Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms. J. ACM 34, 596–615 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gower, J.C., Ross, G.J.S.: Minimum spanning tree and single linkage cluster analysis. Appl. Stats. 18, 54–64 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Guigues, L., Cocquerez, J.P., Men, H.L.: Scale-sets image analysis. IJCV 68(3), 289–317 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jardine, N., Sibson, R.: Mathematical taxonomy. Wiley, Chichester (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcotegui, B., Beucher, S.: Fast implementation of waterfall based on graphs. In: ISMM 2005, pp. 177–186 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer, F.: Minimum spanning forests for morphological segmentation. In: ISMM 1994, pp. 77–84 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer, F.: The dynamics of minima and contours. In: ISMM, pp. 329–336 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer, F., Najman, L.: Segmentation, minimum spanning tree and hierarchies. In: Mathematical Morphology, ch. 9, pp. 229–261. ISTE-Wiley (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morris, O.J., Lee, M.d.J., Constantinides, A.G.: Graph theory for image analysis: an approach based on the shortest spanning tree. IEE Proc. on Communications, Radar and Signal 133(2), 146–152 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Najman, L., Schmitt, M.: Geodesic saliency of watershed contours and hierarchical segmentation. PAMI 18(12), 1163–1173 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Najman, L.: On the equivalence between hierarchical segmentations and ultrametric watersheds. JMIV 40(3), 231–247 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Najman, L., Couprie, M.: Building the component tree in quasi-linear time. IEEE TIP 15(11), 3531–3539 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Najman, L., Couprie, M., Bertrand, G.: Watersheds, mosaics and the emergence paradigm. DAM 147(2-3), 301–324 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Philipp-Foliguet, S., Jordan, M., Najman, L., Cousty, J.: Artwork 3D Model Database Indexing and Classification. Patt. Recogn. 44(3), 588–597 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Salembier, P., Oliveras, A., Garrido, L.: Anti-extensive connected operators for image and sequence processing. IEEE TIP 7(4), 555–570 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tarjan, R.E.: Efficiency of a good but not linear set union algorithm. J. ACM 22, 215–225 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Vachier, C., Meyer, F.: Extinction value: a new measurement of persistence. In: IEEE Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing, pp. 254–257 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zahn, C.T.: Graph-theoretical methods for detecting and descibing gestalt clusters. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-20(1), 99–112 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cousty, J., Najman, L. (2011). Incremental Algorithm for Hierarchical Minimum Spanning Forests and Saliency of Watershed Cuts. In: Soille, P., Pesaresi, M., Ouzounis, G.K. (eds) Mathematical Morphology and Its Applications to Image and Signal Processing. ISMM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6671. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21569-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21569-8_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21568-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21569-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics