Skip to main content

Guidelines for Increasing Prompt Efficiency in Smart Homes According to the Resident’s Profile and Task Characteristics

  • Conference paper
Toward Useful Services for Elderly and People with Disabilities (ICOST 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6719))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Smart homes provide a technologically enhanced environment that helps user’s complete activities of daily living, thus increasing their autonomy. However, predominant use of verbal prompts in smart homes, with little knowledge of their effectiveness, affects significantly their efficiency by providing prompts that are not optimized with the profiles of the users and the characteristics of the tasks. In order for prompts to be effective, they have to compensate the deficits of its users by exploiting their remaining strengths. To contribute solving the issue, we present, in this paper, basic guidelines that are useful for increasing prompt efficiency in smart homes. We identify relevant significant individual profiles and task characteristics that affect prompt efficiency and how to use prompts accordingly. In addition, we illustrate our efforts to validate the proposed guidelines by giving preliminary results from our ongoing experimentations and by presenting the experimental protocol and software application being used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Giroux, S., Leblanc, T., Bouzouane, A., Bouchard, B., Pigot, H., Beauchet, J.: The Praxis of Cognitive Assistance. In: Gottfried, Aghajan (eds.) Behaviour Monitoring and Interpretation, Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments (AISE), pp. 183–211. IOS, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laprise, H., Bouchard, J., Bouchard., B., Bouzouane, A.: Creating tools and trials data sets for smart home researchers. In: Proc. IADIS e-Health, Germany, pp. 143–150 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mihailidis, A., Fernie, G.R.: Context-aware assistive devices for older adults with dementia. Gerontechnology 2(2), 173–188 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lancioni, G.E., O’Reilly, M.F.: Self-management of instructions cues for occupation: review of studies with people with severe or profound developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 22, 41–65 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nailos, M.A., Whitman, T.L., Maxwell, S.E.: Verbal and Visual Instructions with Mental Retardation: The Role of Subject Characteristics and Task Factors. Journal of Behavioral Education 4(2), 201–216 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lopresti, E.F., Bodine, C., Lewis, C.: Assistive Technology for Cognition: Understanding the Needs of Persons with Disabilities. IEEE Engineering in Medecine and Biology Magazine 27(2), 29–39 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LoPresti, E.F., Mihailidis, A., Kirsch, N.: Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 14(1/2), 5–39 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Neill, S.A., Mason, S., Parente, G., Donnelly, M.P., Nugent, C.D., McClean, S.: Video Reminders as Cognitive Prosthetics for People with Dementia. Ageing Int. 1, 1–16 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wherton, J.P., Monk, A.F.: Technological opportunities for supporting people with dementia who are living at home. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 66, 571–586 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Post, M., Montgomery, J., Storey, K.: A decision tree for the use of auditory prompting strategies. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 31, 51–54 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mcgraw-Hunter, M., Faw, G.D., Davis, P.K.: The use of video self-modelling and feedback to teach cooking skills to individuals with traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 20(10), 1061–1068 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fish, J., Evans, J.J., Nimmo, M., Martin, E., Kersel, D., Batemen, A., et al.: Rehabilitation of executive dysfunction following brain injury: “Content-free” cueing improves everyday prospective memory performance. Neuropsychologia 45, 1318–1330 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Tassel, M., Bouchard, J., Bouchard, B., Bouzouane, A. (2011). Guidelines for Increasing Prompt Efficiency in Smart Homes According to the Resident’s Profile and Task Characteristics. In: Abdulrazak, B., Giroux, S., Bouchard, B., Pigot, H., Mokhtari, M. (eds) Toward Useful Services for Elderly and People with Disabilities. ICOST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6719. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21535-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21535-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21534-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21535-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics