Skip to main content

Individual Differences, Aptitude Complexes, SLA Processes, and Aptitude Test Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Individual Differences in Language Learning and Teaching

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

Aptitude for second or foreign language learning is the ability to successfully adapt to and profit from instructed, or naturalistic exposure to the L2. Attention allocation, control, rehearsal in memory, self-regulation, analogical reasoning and many more processes combine to facilitate adaptation and learning in instructed settings, and during participation in instructional tasks. The cognitive processing, emotional and behavioural challenges various settings and tasks pose draw on subtly differentiated clusters of abilities and other personal factors. This paper argues research is needed into these in order to identify ‘complexes’ of abilities or ‘aptitudes’ for ‘types’ of situated pedagogic activity. An aptitude battery that assessed strengths and weaknesses in such complexes would be of great diagnostic value in matching learners to optimal learning contexts. Currently available aptitude tests cannot be used to this end, and so new aptitude batteries must be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, P.L., R.J. Sternberg, and R. Glaser, eds. 1989. Learning and individual differences. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. 1992. Intelligence and development: A cognitive theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. 2007. Working memory thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A., M. Conway, and J. Aggelton, eds. 2002. Episodic memory: New directions for research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J., and C. Marsolek, eds. 2003. Rethinking implicit memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budoff, M. 1987. The validity of learning potential assessment. In ed. C.S. Lidz, 52–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B. 1962. The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In ed. R. Glaser, 87–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B. 1981. Twenty five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In ed. K.C. Diller, 83–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B. 1993. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.B., and S.M. Sapon. 1959. Modern language aptitude test. New York: The Psychological Corporation/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. 1971. Abilities: Their structure growth and action. Boston: Houghton Nefflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A., C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, and J. Towse, eds. 2007. Variation in working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., L.J. Cronbach, H. Kupermintz, D.F. Lohman, E.B. Mandinach, A.W. Porteus, and J.E. Talbert. 2002. Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, S., and P. Robinson, eds. 2001. Individual differences in foreign language learning: Effects of aptitude, intelligence and motivation. Tokyo: Aoyama Gakuin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., and P.A. Carpenter. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19: 450–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bot, K., R.B. Ginsberg, and C. Kramsch, eds. 1991. Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaff, R. 1997. Differential effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. The Hague: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I., V. Egan, G. Gibson, E. Austin, R. Brand, and T. Kellaghan. 1996. Intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis. Intelligence 23: 105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechert, H., and M. Raupach, eds. 1989. Interlingual processing. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R.M. 1995. Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 379–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R.M. 1997. Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R.M. 2003. Implicit and explicit learning. In eds. C.J. Doughty, and M.H. Long, 469–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R.M., ed. 2007. Practice and second language learning: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diller, K.C., ed. 1981. Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C.J. 2001. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In ed. P. Robinson, 206–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C.J., and M.H. Long, eds. 2003. The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C.J., and E. Varela. 1998. Communicative focus on form. In eds. C.J. Doughty, and J. Williams, 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C.J., and J. Williams. 1998a. Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In eds. C.J. Doughty, and J. Williams, 197–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C.J., and J. Williams, eds. 1998b. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N.C. 2001. Memory for language. In ed. P. Robinson, 34–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N.C. 2003. Constructions, chunking and connectionism. In eds. C.J. Doughty, and M.H. Long, 63–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R. 1979. The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device: Theory instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, P., and B. MacWhinney, eds. 1995. The handbook of child language. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganschow, L., and R.L. Sparks. 1993. Foreign language learning disabilities: Issues, research, and teaching implications. In eds. S.A. Vogel, and P.B. Adelman, 282–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., ed. 1962. Training research and education. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E.L. 2002. Language-based learning disabilities. In ed. P. Robinson, 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E.L., R.J. Sternberg, and M. Ehrman. 2000. A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language aptitude: The CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal 84: 390–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthke, J. 1992. Learning tests: The concept, main research findings, problems and trends. Learning and Individual Differences 4: 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, B., and D. Hart. 1997. Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, B., and D. Hart. 2002. Age, aptitude, and second language learning on a bilingual exchange. In ed. P. Robinson, 301–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, M. 2001. Sentence processing. In ed. P. Robinson, 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A., and L. Bourne, eds. 1998. Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, J.H. 1989. Implicit and incidental language learning: Experiments in the processing of natural and partly artificial input. In eds. H. Dechert, and M. Raupach, 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, J.H. 2001. Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In ed. P. Robinson, 258–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, J.H., and R.M. DeKeyser, eds. 1997. Second language acquisition research in the laboratory: Special Issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita, S., and S. Lupker, eds. 2003. Masked priming: The state of the art. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, E., and A. Neubauer. 1996. Speed of information processing in an inductive reasoning task and its relationship to psychometric intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences 20: 653–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D. 1981. Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In ed. K.C. Diller, 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeman, J., I. Artegoitia, B. Fridman, and C.J. Doughty. 1995. Integrating attention to form with meaning: focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In ed. R. Schmidt, 217–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, C.S., ed. 1987. Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightbown, P., and N. Spada. 1999. How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G.D. 1988. Towards an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 95: 492–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M.H. 1991. Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In eds. K. De Bot, R.B. Ginsberg, and C. Kramsch, 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M.H., and P. Robinson. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research, practice. In eds. C.J. Doughty, and J. Williams, 15–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., J. Philp, T. Egi, A. Fujii, and T. Tatsumi. 2002. Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In ed. P. Robinson, 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. 2001. The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In ed. P. Robinson, 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merickle, P.M., and E.M. Reingold. 1991. Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17: 224–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., and N. Friedman. 1998. Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In eds. A. Healy, and L. Bourne, 339–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. 2003. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muranoi, H. 2000. Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning 50: 617–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J.M., and L. Ortega. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50: 417–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, C., and A. Al Haik. 1976. The development of the defense language aptitude battery. Educational and Psychological Measurement 36: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimsleur, P. 1966. Pimsleur language aptitude battery (PLAB). New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta, L. 2002. The role of learners’ analytic abilities in the communicative classroom. In ed. P. Robinson, 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A.S. 1993. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 1995a. Attention, memory and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis. Language Learning 45: 283–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 1995b. Aptitude, awareness, and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In ed. R. Schmidt, 1995, 303–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 1996a. Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 27–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 1996b. Consciousness rules and instructed second language acquisition. New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 1997a. Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning 47: 45–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 1997b. Automaticity and generalizability of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced and rule-search conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 2001a. Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes, and learning conditions in SLA. Second Language Research 17: 268–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., ed. 2001b. Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 2002a. Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In ed. P. Robinson, 113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 2002b. Individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory during adult incidental second language learning: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield and Hernstadt (1991). In ed. P. Robinson, 211–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., ed. 2002c. Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 2003. Attention and memory in SLA. In eds. C.J. Doughty, and M.H. Long, 631–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 2005a. Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 46–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 2005b. Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 235–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. 2007. Aptitude, abilities, contexts and practice. In ed. R.M. DeKeyser, 256–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., and N.C. Ellis, eds. 2008. The handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., and M. Ha. 1993. Instance theory and second language rule learning under explicit conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 413–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., and Y. Yamaguchi. 1999. Aptitude, task feedback and generalizability of focus on form: A classroom study. Paper presented at the 12th AILA World Congress, Waseda University, Tokyo, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. 1996. Second language proficiency foreign language aptitude, and intelligence. New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeken, W., G. De Vooght, A. Vandierendonck, and G. Y’deWalle, eds. 2002. Deductive reasoning and strategies. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11: 127–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R., ed. 1995. Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In ed. P. Robinson, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R.J., et al. 2002. Richard Snow’s remaking of the concept of aptitude and multidimensional test validity: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Assessment 8: 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sick, J., and K. Irie. 2001. The Lunic Language Marathon: A new language aptitude instrument for Japanese foreign language learners. In eds. S. Cornwell, and P. Robinson, 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. 2002. Theorising and updating aptitude. In ed. P. Robinson, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E. 1987. Aptitude complexes. In eds. R.E. Snow, and M.J. Farr, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E. 1989. Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on learning and individual differences. In eds. P.L. Ackerman, R.J. Sternberg, and R. Glaser, 13–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E. 1994. Abilities in academic tasks. In eds. R.J. Sternberg, and R.K. Wagner, 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E., and M.J. Farr, eds. 1987. Aptitude, learning and instruction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovitch, K.E. 1999. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. 1985. Beyond IQ: a triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. 2002. The theory of successful intelligence and its implications for language aptitude testing. In ed. P. Robinson, 13–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J., and E.L. Grigorenko. 2000. Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J., and R.K. Wagner, eds. 1994. Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, R., and V. Villa. 1994. Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanPatten, B., ed. 2004. Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S.A., and P.B. Adelman, eds. 1993. Success for college students with learning disabilities. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. 1998. Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In eds. C.J. Doughty, and J. Williams, 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.N., and P. Lovatt. 2003. Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning 53: 67–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Robinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, P. (2012). Individual Differences, Aptitude Complexes, SLA Processes, and Aptitude Test Development. In: Pawlak, M. (eds) New Perspectives on Individual Differences in Language Learning and Teaching. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20850-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics