Skip to main content

A Design Science Research Roadmap

  • Conference paper
Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research (DESRIST 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6629))

Abstract

This paper proposes and synthesizes from previous design science (DS) methodological literature a structured and detailed DS Roadmap for the conduct of DS research. The Roadmap is a general guide for researchers to carry out DS research by suggesting reasonably detailed activities. Though highly tentative, it is believed the Roadmap usefully inter-relates many otherwise seemingly disparate, overlapping or conflicting concepts. It is hoped the DS Roadmap will aid in the planning, execution and communication of DS research, while also attracting constructive criticism, improvements and extensions. A key distinction of the Roadmap from other DS research methods is its breadth of coverage of DS research aspects and activities; its detail and scope. We demonstrate and evaluate the Roadmap by presenting two case studies in terms of the DS Roadmap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Iivari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 39–64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuechler, W.L., Vaishnavi, V.K.: The emergence of design research in information systems in North America. Journal of Design Research 7(1), 1–16 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Samuel-Ojo, O., et al.: Meta-analysis of Design Science Research within the IS Community: Trends, Patterns, and Outcomes. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 124–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. March, S.T., Storey, V.C.: Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 725–730 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design science research methods and patterns: innovating information and communication technology. Auerbach Publication, Taylor & Francis Group, NY (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M.: A Multi-Grounded Design Research Process. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 45–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Winter, R.: Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 470–475 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iivari, J., Venable, J.: Action research and design science research–seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar. In: 17th European Conference on Information Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.: Soft design science methodology. In: DESRIST 2009. ACM, Malvern (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hevner, A.R.: A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 87–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Järvinen, P.: Action research is similar to design science. Quality and Quantity 41(1), 37–54 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Minder, C., Titus, D.M.P.: Systems development in information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 7(3), 89–106 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peffers, K., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossi, M., Sein, M.K.: Design research workshop: a proactive research approach. Presentation delivered at IRIS 26, 9–12 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design research in information systems, February 20 (2004), http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/drisISworld.htm (cited January 10, 2010)

  17. Venable, J.: A Framework for Design Science Research Activities. In: Information Resource Management Association Conference (CD), Washington, DC, USA. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Indulska, M., Recker, J.C.: Design science in IS research: a literature analysis. In: Proceedings 4th Biennial ANU Workshop on Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Venable, J.: Design Science Research Post Hevner et al.: Criteria, Standards, Guidelines, and Expectations. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 109–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 43–58 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C., Gage, N.L.: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin, Dallas (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kline, R.B.: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, J., Wyner, G.M., Pentland, B.T.: Process grammar as a tool for business process design. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 757–778 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: The design theory nexus. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 731–755 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.: Introduction to the special issue on design science. Information Systems and E-Business Management 9(1), 1–9 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nunamaker Jr, J.F., Chen, M., Purdin, T.D.M.: Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(3), 89–106 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Strategies for design science research evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Galway, Ireland (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Evaluation Risks in Design Science Research: A Framework. In: Third International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. Georgia State University, Atlanta (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Goldkuhl, G.: Design theories in information systems-a need for multi-grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 59–72 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Venable, J.: The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research. In: Proceedings of DESRIST 2006, Claremont, CA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2), 155–169 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Österle, H., et al.: Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems 20(1), 7–10 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosemann, M., Vessey, I.: Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: The role of applicability checks. MIS Quarterly 32(1), 1–22 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.W.: Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 3–16 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Owen, C.L.: Design research: building the knowledge base. Design Studies 19(1), 9–20 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies 41(2), 219–246 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cole, R., et al.: Being proactive: where action research meets design research. In: Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems. Citeseer, Atlanta (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Baskerville, R., et al.: A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum. European Journal of Information Systems 20(1), 11–15 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Simon, H.A.: The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 489–504 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Takeda, H., et al.: Modeling design process. AI Magazine 11(4), 37 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Venable, J.: Identifying and Addressing Stakeholder Interests in Design Science Research: An Analysis Using Critical Systems Heuristics. In: Dhillon, G., Stahl, B.C., Baskerville, R. (eds.) CreativeSME 2009. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 301, pp. 93–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Baskerville, R.: What design science is not. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 441–443 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Järvinen, P.: On reviewing of results in design research. In: The 15th European Conference on Information Systems, Switzerland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Purao, S.: Design research in the technology of information systems: Truth or dare, Unpublished Working Paper, Atlanta (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S.: Desperately seeking the’IT’in IT research-a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2), 121–134 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Offermann, P., et al.: Artifact Types in Information Systems Design Science – A Literature Review. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alturki, A., Gable, G.G., Bandara, W. (2011). A Design Science Research Roadmap. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics