Abstract
The value of academic knowledge and knowledge transfer (KT) as part of the third stream activity within HE (Higher Education) has for some years now been regarded as important for global competitiveness and consequently a key feature of UK HE policy-making. However there remain some issues for achieving a fully-fledged third stream. Few meaningful conclusions exist regarding the issues of mismatch between policy trajectory and achievement. More in-depth understanding of how and if third stream policy is meaningful in the interpretation by various stakeholders, is argued as important for understanding policy implementation issues. This conceptual paper seeks to establish a more meaningful approach to investigating the KT policy domain. Questioning the coherency and clarity of UK policy discourse, the paper asks: how is valid knowledge and knowledge transfer conceptualised? A model for analysis and investigation of such issues is developed. Drawn from conceptions in the academic and wider literature a ‘Four Metaphor Framework’ categorises valid knowledge and the transfer process as: ‘Transfer’, ‘Exchange’, ‘Partnership’; ‘Beyond a Capitalist Transaction’. The usefulness of the framework is assessed through its application to the discourse of key documents from UK policy. The mixed metaphors revealed in policy discourse are potentially significant in the light of the gap between government aspirations and achievement. For those concerned with the issues of effective design and implementation of KT policy, this paper provides an analytical model for subsequent empirical studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agrawal, A.: University to industry Knowledge Transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews 3(4), 285–302 (2001)
Becher, T.: Academic Tribes and Territories. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham (1989)
Biglan, A.: The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57, 195–203 (1973a)
Biglan, A.: Relationship between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology 57, 204–213 (1973b)
BIS, The Future of Higher Education, Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2003), http://www.desf.gov.uk/hetgateway/strategy/hestrategy/foreward.shtml (accessed, 01/04/2010)
BIS, Higher Ambitions: The future of Universities in a Knowledge Economy, Executive Summary, Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2009), http://www.bis.gov.uk (accessed, 01/04/2010)
Delanty, G.: Challenging Knowledge, The University in the Knowledge Society. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham (2001)
DIUS, Implementing the Race to the top: Lord Sainsbury’s Review of Government’s Science and Innovation Policies, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, TSO (2008a), http://www.tsoshop.co.uk (accessed, 17/03/2010)
DIUS, Innovation Nation Executive Summary, Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (2008b), http://www.dius.gov.uk/policies/innovation/white-paper (accessed, 17/03/2010)
Etzkowitz, H.: The Triple Helix. University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Routledge, New York (2008)
Fanghanel, J.: Local Responses to institutional policy: a discursive approach to positioning. Studies in Higher Education 32(2) (2007)
Fowler, C., Lee, A.: Knowing how to know: questioning ‘knowledge transfer’ as a model for knowing and learning in health. Studies in Continuing Education 29(2), 181–193 (2007)
Francis-Smythe, J.: Enhancing academic engagement in knowledge transfer activity in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 12(3), 68–72 (2008)
Furlong, J., Oancea, A.: Assessing Quality in Applied and Practice-Based Educational Research: A framework for discussion. Oxford University Department of Educational Studies, Oxford (2005), http://www.essc.ac.uk/assessing_quality_shortreport-tcm6-8232.pdf (accessed, April 2010)
Geuna, A., Muscio, A.: The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Minerva 47, 93–114 (2009)
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotony, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (eds.): The New Production of Knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Buckingham (1994)
Godemann, J.: Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation. Environmental Education Research 14(6), 625–641 (2008)
Hammersley, M.: Troubling Criteria: a critical commentary on Furlong and Oancea’s framework for assessing educational research. British Educational Research Journal 34(6), 747–762 (2008)
HEFCE, Strategic Plan 2006-11, updated May 2008, Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol (2008)
HMSO, Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London (2003)
Huff, A.S., Huff, J.O.: Re-Focusing the Business School Agenda. British Journal of Management 12, Special issues, S49–S54 (2001)
Lazzeretti, L., Tavoletti, E.: Higher Education Excellence and Local Economic Development: The Case of the Entrepreneurial University of Twente. European Planning Studies 13(3), 475–493 (2005)
Mayo, P.: Competitiveness, diversification and the international higher education cash flow: the EU’s higher education discourse amidst the challenges of globalisation. International Studies in Sociology of Education 19(2), 87–103 (2009)
Neumann, R., Parry, S., Becher, T.: Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: a conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education 27(4), 405–417 (2002)
Ozga, J.: Policy Research in Educational Settings. Open University Press, Buckingham (2000)
Ozga, J.: From Research to Policy and Practice: Some Issues in Knowledge Transfer, CES Briefing no. 31, CES, University of Edinburgh (2004)
Ozga, J., Jones, R.: Travelling and embedded policy: the case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy 21(1), 1–17 (2006)
Peters, M.: National education policy constructions of the ‘knowledge economy’: towards a critique. Journal of Educational Enquiry 2(1), 1–21 (2001)
Pilbeam, C.: Generating additional revenue stream in UK universities: An analysis of variation between disciplines and institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 28(3), 297–311 (2006)
Prior, L.: Following in Foucault’s Footsteps – text and context in Qualitative Research. In: Silverman, D. (ed.) Qualitative Research, Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 63–79. Sage, London (1997)
Ray, T., Little, S.: Communication and Context: Collective Tacit Knowledge and practice in Japan’s WorkplaceF. Creativity and Innovation Management 10(3) (2001)
Rhoades, G.: Technology-enhanced Courses and a Mode III Organisation of Instructional Work. Tertiary Education Management 13(1), 1–17 (2007)
Rhoades, G.: Capitalism, Academic Style and Shared Governance. Academe 91(3), 38–42 (2005)
Smith, D., Taylor, C.: Knowledge Transfer in the arts and humanities: policy images and institutional realities. Journal for Continuing Liberal Adult Education (38), 13–17 (2009)
Sylva, K., Taggart, B., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I.: Changing models of research to inform educational policy. Research Papers in Education 22(2), 155–168 (2007)
Trowler, P.: Academics Responding to Change: New Higher Education Frameworks and Academic Cultures. Open University Press, SRHE, Buckingham (1998)
TSB, Connect and Catalyse: A strategy for business innovation 2008-2011, Technology Strategy Board, Swindon (2008)
TSB, Knowledge Transfer Partnerships, Technology Strategy Board (2010), http://www.ktponline.org.uk/strategy/background.aspx (accessed, 08/04/2010)
Urwin, P.: Research, teaching and knowledge transfer: separate and distinct? Conference paper: British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Herriot-Watt University, Edinburgh (September 11-13, 2003), http://leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003357.htm (accessed, April 2010)
Van Vught, F.: The EU Innovation Agenda: Challenges for European Higher Education and Research. Higher Education Management and Policy 21(2), 13–34 (2009)
Williams, P.: Valid Knowledge: the economy and the academy. Higher Education 54, 511–523 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Michels, N. (2011). A Conceptual Approach towards Understanding Issues in the Third Stream: Conceptions of Valid Knowledge and Transfer in UK Policy. In: Howlett, R.J. (eds) Innovation through Knowledge Transfer 2010. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20508-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20508-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20507-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20508-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)