Skip to main content

Defining Resilience Mathematically: From Attractors To Viability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Viability and Resilience of Complex Systems

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

The previous chapter presents different views of resilience, starting from Holling’s conceptual definition of “ecological resilience”: the capacity of a system to absorb “disturbance and reorganize while undergoing change so as to still retain essentially the same function, structure, identity, and feedbacks” (Walker et al. 2004). In this chapter, we focus on operational, mathematically precise definitions of resilience. In the literature, the main mathematical definitions of resilience are based on dynamical systems theory, and more specifically on attractors and attraction basins (also related to ‘regime shifts’ presented in the previous chapter). We present these definitions in detail, and illustrate their utility on a relatively simple rangeland management model. Furthermore, we use the rangeland example to highlight some key limitations of attractor based definitions of resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Walker BH (2002) Grazing management, resilience, and the dynamics of a fire-driven rangeland system. Ecosystems 5:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubin JP (1991) Viability Theory. Birkhauser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beddington JR, Free CA, Lawton JH (1976) Concepts of stability and resilience in predator-prey models. J Anim Ecol 45:791–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Béné D, Doyen L, Gabay D (2001) A viability analysis for a bio-economic model. Ecol Econ 36(3):385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Collings JB, Wollkind DJ (1990) A global analysis of a temperature-dependent model system for a mite predator-prey interaction. SIAM J Appl Math 50(5):1348–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeAngelis DL (1980) Energy flow, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem resilience. Ecology 61(4):764–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deffuant G, Chapel L, Martin S (2007) Approximating viability kernels with Support Vector Machines. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 52(5):933–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Doyen L, DeLara M, Ferraris J, Pelletier D (2007) Sustainability of exploited marine ecosystems through protected areas : A viability model and a coral reef case study. Ecol Modell208(2–4):353–366

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin S (2004) The cost of restoration as a way of defining resilience: a viability approach applied to a model of lake eutrophication. Ecol Soc 9(2):8. [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art8/

  11. Matsinos YG, Troumbis AY (2002) Modeling competition, dispersal and effects of disturbance in the dynamics of a grassland community using a cellular automaton. Ecol Modell 149:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullon C, Curry P, Shannon L (2004) Viability model of trophic interactions in marine ecosystems. Nat Resour Model 17:27–58

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murray RM, Sastry SS, Li Z (1994) A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neubert MG, Caswell H (1997) Alternatives to resilience for measuring the responses of ecological systems to perturbations. Ecology 78(3):653–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz M, Wolff M (2002) Dynamical simulation of mass-balace trophic models for benthic communities of north-central Chile: assessment of resilience time under alternative management scenarios. Ecol Modell 148:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pimm SL, Lawton JH (1977) Number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature 268:329–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Coller L (1997) Automated techniques for the qualitative analysis of ecological models : Continuous models. Conserv Ecol 1(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2): 5. [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, S., Deffuant, G., Calabrese, J.M. (2011). Defining Resilience Mathematically: From Attractors To Viability. In: Deffuant, G., Gilbert, N. (eds) Viability and Resilience of Complex Systems. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20423-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20423-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20422-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20423-4

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics