Skip to main content

Enhancing the Computational Collective Intelligence within Communities of Practice Using Trust and Reputation Models

  • Chapter
Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence III

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 6560))

Abstract

Knowledge assets are a critical resource that can generate a competitive advantage for organizations. Generally, knowledge can be divided in explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge. Organizations focus on managing the explicit knowledge, but also on capturing the tacit knowledge embedded in the individuals’ experiences. Through the interactions in social networks, community-based knowledge development has become a very effective tool. In this context, more and more organizations are developing communities of practice as a strategic tool for knowledge development and sharing within the organization and across organizational boundaries. In the last years numerous contributions and approaches pointed out the importance of communities of practice in the knowledge economy. The most relevant argument is that communities of practice are the core of collective learning and collective intelligence, relaying on a permanent exchange of knowledge and information related to the practice. Communities of practice enhance particular knowledge that exist in the organizations and contribute to its coherence. Communities of practice can provide a social reservoir for practitioners, knowledge producers and policy makers to analyze, address and explore new solutions to their problems. These communities are emerging in knowledge-based organizations. They can enhance the efficiency of production and can improve the innovative processes. The paper addresses the new trends and challenges of knowledge dynamics within communities of practice and examines the emergence of this type of communities. We show how computational techniques enhance collective intelligence within communities of practice and suggest a way to model communities’ dynamics. The main objective of the paper is to simulate computational collective intelligence using agent-based models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdul-Rahman, A., Hailes, S.: Supporting Trust in Virtual Communities. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahamed, S.V.: Computational framework for knowledge – Integrated behavior of machines. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Andriessen, E., Huis, M.: Group dynamics and CoPs. Position paper, ECSCW (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bakshy, E., Wilensky, U.: NetLogo Team Assembly model. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (2007), http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/TeamAssembly

  5. Bedrouni, A., Mittu, R., Boukhtouta, A., Berger, J.: Distributed Intelligent Systems – A coordination perspective. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Principles of Trust for MAS: Cognitive Anatomy, Social Importance, and Quantification. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gambetta, D.: Can We Trust Trust? In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, ch. 13, pp. 213–237. University of Oxford (2000), http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/gambetta213-237.pdf

  8. Garrido, P.: Business Sustainability and Collective Intelligence. The Learning Organization 16(3), 208–222 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., Amaral, L.A.N.: Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance. Science 308(5722), 697–720 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heylighen, F.: Collective Intelligence and its Implementation on the Web: algorithms to develop a collective mental map. Springer, Netherlands (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., Wright, P.: Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management 4(1), 27–38 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huynh, T.D., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N.R.: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In: Springer Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 13, pp. 119–154 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Juriado, R., Gustafsson, N.: Emergent communities of practice in temporary inter-organizational partnerships. The Learning Organization: The International Journal of Knowledge and Organizational Learning Management 14(1), 50–61 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Lévy, P.: Opening the semantic space in the service of collective intelligence. Elect. J. Commun. Inf. Innov. Health (1), 127–137 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liebowitz, J.: The quick basics of knowledge management. In: Liebowitz, J., Schieber, A.R., Andreadis, J.D. (eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luck, M., McBurney, P., Preist, C.: Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing – A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing. Agent Link (2003) ISBN 0854 327886

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marsh, S.P.: Formalizing Trust as a Computational Concept. PhD Thesis, Department of Computing Science and Mathematics. University of Stirling (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muller, P.: Reputation, trust and the dynamics of leadership in communities of practice. J. Manage. Governance (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nissen, M.E.: An extended model of knowledge flow dynamics. Communications of the Association for Information System 8, 251–266 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nissen, M.E., Levitt, R.E.: Agent-based modeling of knowledge flows: Illustration from the domain of information system design. In: Proceedings of 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Hirata, T.: Managing flow – A process theory of the knowledge-based firm. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Noubel, J. F.: Collective intelligence, the invisible revolution. The Transitioner.org (2004), http://www.thetransitioner.org/wen/tiki-list_file_gallery.php?galleryId=1

  24. Por, G., van Bukkum, E.: Liberating the Innovation Value of Communities of Practice, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rutkowski, L.: Computational intelligence – Methods and techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabater-Mir, J., Sierra, C.: REGRET: A Reputation Model for Gregarious Societies (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scarlat, E., Maries, I.: Towards an Increase of Collective Intelligence within Organizations using Trust and Reputation Models. In: Nguyen, N.T., Kowalczyk, R., Chen, S.-M. (eds.) ICCCI 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5796, pp. 140–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) ISSN 0302-9743

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Szuba, T., Almulla, M.: Was Collective Intelligence before Life on Earth? In: Rolim, J.D.P. (ed.) IPDPS-WS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1800, p. 586. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R.: The Future of Professional Communities of Practice. LNBIP, vol. 22. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walthur, J.B.: Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research 23(1), 3–43 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Weiss, G.: Prologue – Multiagent Systems and Distributed Artificial Intelligence. In: Multiagent Systems, A Modern Approach to Distributed Modern Approach to Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–24. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wenger, E.C., Snyder, W.M.: Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review 78(1), 139–145 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wenger, E., McDermott, R.A., Snyder, W.: Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zacharia, G.: Collaborative Reputation Mechanisms for Online Communities. Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, W., Watts, S.: Online communities as communities of practice: a case study. Journal of Knowledge Management 12(4), 55–71 (2008) ISSN 1367-3270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maries, I., Scarlat, E. (2011). Enhancing the Computational Collective Intelligence within Communities of Practice Using Trust and Reputation Models. In: Nguyen, N.T. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence III. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6560. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19968-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19968-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19967-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19968-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics