Skip to main content

Komplexität handhaben – Handeln vereinheitlichen – Organisationen sicher gestalten

  • Chapter
Human Factors

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Amalberti, R. (1999). Automation in aviation: A human factors perspective. In D. Garland, J. Wise & V. Hopkin (Eds.), Handbook of aviation human factors(pp. 173–192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amalberti, R. (2001). The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Safety Science, 37,109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmos, D., Duchon, D., McDaniel Jr, R. & Huonker, J. (2002). What a mess! Participation as a simple managerial rule to ‚complexify’ organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (2),189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battmann, W. & Klumb, P. (1993). Behavioural economics and compliance with safety regulations. Safety Science, 16,35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayon, P. & Friesdorf, W. (2006). Human factors and ergonomics in medicine. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics(pp. 1517–1537). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm(2ndedn.). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dien, Y. (1998). Safety and application of procedures, or ‚how do »they« have to use operating procedures in nuclear power plants?’ Safety Science, 29 (3),179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1976). Problemlösen als Informationsverarbeitung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1981). Über die Schwierigkeiten menschlichen Umgangs mit Komplexität. Psychologische Rundschau, 32,163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1989). Die Logik des Mißlingens. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F. & Stäudel, T. (1983). LohhausenVom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E. (1959). Characteristics of socio-technical systems. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, U. (1984). Mehrfachhandeln in dynamischen Umfeldern. Vorschläge zu einer systematischen Erweiterung psychologisch-handlungstheoretischer Modelle. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, A. A. (2009). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (1995). Organisationsstruktur. In W. Sarges (Ed.), Managementdiagnostik(S.156–162). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, G. (1997). Autonomie und Kontrolle. Zur Gestaltung automatisierter und risikoreicher Systeme(Vol. 16). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, G. (2004). Uncertainty management at the core of system design. Annual Reviews in Control, 28,267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, W. (1976). Psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, A. R. (1990). Safety rules OK? Possibilities and limitations in behavioural safety strategies. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 12,3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, A. R. & Swuste, P. (1998). Safety rules: procedural freedom or action constraint? Safety Science, 29,163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T. K., Manser, T., Howard, S. K. & Gaba, D. M. (2006). Use of cognitive aids in a simulated anesthetic crisis. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 103 (3),551–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. C. (1980). An organizational perspective on psycho-technical system perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5 (1),43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. (2011). Risk-management and rule-compliance: Decision-making in hazardous industries. Safety Science, 49 (2), 110-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hukki, K. & Norros, L. (1993). Diagnostic orientation in control of disturbance situations. Ergonomics, 36 (11),1317–1327.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSAG. (2002). Key practical issues in strengthening safety culture (Safety Series No.75-INSAG-15). Vienna: IAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. & Kubicek, H. (1992). Organisation(3 ed.). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluwe, R. (1997). Informationsverarbeitung, Wissen und mentale Modelle beim Umgang mit komplexen Systemen. In K. Sonntag & N. Schaper (Hrsg.), Störungsmanagement und Diagnosekompetenz(S. 13–37). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, R. (1998). Not working to rule: understanding procedural violations at work. Safety Science, 28 (2),77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplat, J. (1998). About the implementation of safety rules. Safety Science, 29,189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, J. V., Wagner, K., Voytovich, A. E. & Sheehan, J. (2000). Transfusion errors in New York State: an analysis of 10 years’ experience. Transfusion, 40 (10),1207–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser, T., Leins, A. & Wehner, T. (1998). Rahmenbedingungen des Handelns und Handlungsstile in der Anästhesie (Forschungsbericht HAVANA). Zürich: Institut für Arbeitspsychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, K., Saleh, J. H. & Leveson, N. G. (2006). Archetypes for organizational safety. Safety Science, 44,565–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., Schulz, M. & Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninck, A., Bürki, L., Hungerbühler, R. & Mühlemann, H. (1998). Systemik, integrales Denken, Konzipieren und Realisieren. Zürich: Verlag Industrielle Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros, L. (1996). System disturbances as springboard for development of operators’ expertise. In Y. Engeström & D. A. Middelton (Eds.), Communication and Cognition at Work(pp. 159–177). Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D. & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15,203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32,194–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, M. M. & Hinshaw, D. B. (2002). The safety checklist program: Creating a culture of safety in intensive care units. Jt Comm J Qual Improv, 28 (6),306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models.IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, SMC 13,257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science, 27,183–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. & Svedung, I. (2000). Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Karlstad: Swedish Rescue Services Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundmo, T. (2000). Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in Norsk Hydro. Safety Science, 34,47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, H. M., Driver, M. J. & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simard, M. & Marchand, A. (1995). A multilevel analysis of organisational factors related to the taking of safety initiatives by work groups. Safety Science, 21 (2),113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (6),1962, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triebe, J. K. (1977). Entwicklung von Handlungsstrategien in der Arbeit. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 31 (3),221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M., Sanderson, P. & Russell, W. J. (2004). Tailoring reveals information requirements: The case of anaesthesia alarms. Interacting with computers, 16,271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, T. (1992). Fehlerfreie Sicherheit – weniger als ein günstiger Störfall. In T. Wehner (Hrsg.), Sicherheit als Fehlerfreundlichkeit(S. 14–33). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, T. & Stadler, M. (1994). The cognitive organisation of human errors: A Gestalt theory perspective. Applied Psychology: An Intenational Review, 43 (4),565–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. & Sutcliffe, K. (2001). Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21,1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1987). Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. California Management Review, 29 (2),112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettig, J. (2002). New developments in standardisation in the past 15 years – product versus process related standards. Safety Science, 40,51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitsett, C. F. & Robichaux, M. G. (2001). Assessment of blood administration procedures: problems identified by direct observation and administrative incident reporting. Transfusion, 41 (5),581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. D. & Cook, R. I. (2001). From counting failures to anticipating risks: Possible futures for patient safety. In L. Zipperer & S. Cushman (Eds.), Lessons in patient safety. A primer(pp. 89–97). Chicago: National Patient Safety Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manser, T. (2012). Komplexität handhaben – Handeln vereinheitlichen – Organisationen sicher gestalten. In: Badke-Schaub, P., Hofinger, G., Lauche, K. (eds) Human Factors. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19886-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics