Skip to main content

A Comparison of the Street Networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advancing Geoinformation Science for a Changing World

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC,volume 1))

Abstract

In Germany, the data of the Open Street Map project has become available as an alternative to proprietary road networks in commercial business geomatics software and their customers are wondering whether the quality may be sufficient. This paper describes an implemented methodology to compare OSM street data with those of Navteq for all populated roads in Germany. As a unique feature, the presented methodology is based on a matching between the street objects of OSM and Navteq and all steps are fully automated so that they can be applied to updated versions of both data sets.

While there are considerable qualitative differences between regions, towns, and street categories, at a national level the relative completeness of objects, their relative precision, and the relative completeness of names are high enough for maps. However, other attributes, which are needed for the computation of catchment areas, are still relatively incomplete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Devogele, T., Parent, C and Spaccapietra, S. (1998) On spatial database integration. INT J GEOGR INF SCI, 12 (3), 335 – 352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eng, M. (2009) A quality analysis of OpenStreetMap data. Dissertation. University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M.F. (2006) Foreword, In: Devillers, R and Jeansoulin, R (ed.) Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality. ISTE, London, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakley, M. (2009) How good is OpenStreetMap information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets for London and the rest of England. Retrieved December, 10, from London’s Global University: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfamha/OSM%20data%20analysis%20070808_web.p df

  • ISO 14825 (2004) Intelligent transport systems - Geographic Data Files (GDF) - Overall data specification. City.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 19113 (2002) Geographic information - quality principles. International Organization for Standardization. Genf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joos, G. (2000) Zur Qualität von objektstrukturierten Geodaten. München, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, I. (2010) Abbildung von Straßendaten für Qualitätsuntersuchungen – Ein Vergleich von OpenStreetMap mit Navteq, Universität Bonn, Diploma Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navteq (2009) Navteq's NAVSTREETS Street Data: Reference Manual v3.0. 2008. – Retrieved December, 10, 2009, from: http://faculty.unlv.edu/ jensen/ gisdata/navteq/TechnicalReference/NAVSTREETS_Reference_Manual_v3-.pdf.

  • Neis, P., Zipf, A., Helsper, R., Kehl, A. (2006): Webbasierte Erreichbarkeitsanalyse – Vorschläge zur Definition eines Accessibility Analysis Service (AAS) auf Basis des OpenLS Route Service. REAL CORP. Wien. Retrieved June, 22, 2010, from: http://tolu.giub.unibonn. de/karto/CORP07-AAS-pn-az-final.pdf

  • Neis, P., Zielstra, D., Zipf, A., Struck, A. (2010) Empirische Untersuchungen zur Datenqualität von OpenStreetMap – Erfahrungen aus zwei Jahren Betrieb mehrerer OSM-Online-Dienste. AGIT 2010. Symposium für Angewandte Geoinformatik. Salzburg. Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederik Ramm, Jochen Topf, Steve Chilton (2010) OpenStreetMap: Using, and Contributing to, the Free World Map, UIT Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, S., Neis, P., Zipf, A. (2008) New applications based on collaborative geodata – the case of routing. Submitted for: XXVIII INCA International Congress on Collaborative Mapping and SpaceTechnology, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. Retrieved June, 22, 2010, from: http://tolu.giub.uni-bonn.de/ karto/publications/pdf/conference/cmap2008.cartography-bonn.subm.pdf

  • Walter, V. and Fritsch, D. (1999) Matching spatial data sets: a statistical approach. INT J GEOGR INF SCI, 13 (5). 445 – 473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. and Meng, L. (2007) An iterative road-matching approach for the integration of postal data. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 31,597 – 615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zielstra, D. and Zipf, A. (2010) A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany. AGILE 2010. The 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science. Guimarães, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ina Ludwig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ludwig, I., Voss, A., Krause-Traudes, M. (2011). A Comparison of the Street Networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany. In: Geertman, S., Reinhardt, W., Toppen, F. (eds) Advancing Geoinformation Science for a Changing World. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(), vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19789-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics