Abstract
Renowned for biological diversity, Amazonian rainforests are also regions of high cultural diversity. However, in recent decades, most indigenous rainforest people have become settled and acquired titles to large tropical forest areas, are increasingly integrating into the market economy, and are experiencing rapid sociocultural change. In this chapter, we examine five ethnic groups in the northern Ecuadorian Amazon and highlight the importance of sociocultural and economic contexts in understanding indigenous patterns of forest use. Using ethnographic and survey data collected in 2001, we compare and contrast these indigenous populations in terms of demographic characteristics, involvement in the market economy, and patterns of forest conversion and faunal exploitation, observing different degrees of external pressures and opportunities, cultural values, and historical constraints, which, taken together, influence their choices about resource use and market contact and their long-run prospects for cultural survival.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In some communities, several households far from the community center were excluded from the time use study and the household diaries as they could not be routinely visited in the circuit of random visits.
- 2.
When necessary, an interpreter was recruited from the community to assist. This was necessary only about 10% of the time, mainly with older women in Cofán and Huaorani communities.
- 3.
TFR is the number of live births that a woman would be expected to have during her lifetime based on current fertility levels, viz. age-specific fertility rates of women aged 15–19, 20–24, …, to 45–49. The TFR is the sum of the age-specific fertility rates for the seven age groups of women, each of which is based on the sum of births in a year to females of that age group divided by the number of women of that age group. It is a widely used indicator of period fertility.
- 4.
These numbers are actually based on preliminary tabulations from the second or survey phase of the project, based on replies from 289–298 wives of heads of households in 28 communities. The 53% figure is still much lower than the figure for colonist women (70%) – see Bilsborrow et al. (2004).
- 5.
Data from the household surveys of rural colonist populations in 1999 and of indigenous populations in 2001 indicate a striking increase in immunization of children of both indigenous and colonist children in the Ecuadorian Amazon between the 1980s and 1990s (Pan and Erlien 2004).
- 6.
However, at the time of the study, tourism levels had dramatically declined, which is likely to have elevated rates of hunting from their usual level.
References
Albuja L, Cáceres F, Almendáriz A (2000) Diagnóstico ambiental en el sector ampliado del convenio entre el Ministerio del Ambiente y la Comunidad Cofán de Zábalo, Reserva de Producción FaunÃstica Cuyabeno. Informe Final Convenioo, Proyecto PETRAMAZ-Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador
Beckerman S (1987) Swidden in Amazonia and the Amazon Rim. In: Turner BL II, Brush SB (eds) Comparative farming systems. Gilford, New York, pp 55–94
Bilsborrow RE (1987) Population pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: a conceptual framework and recent evidence. World Dev 15(2):183–203
Bilsborrow RE, Vallejo L (2002) Urbanization, infrastructure change and development in the Ecuadorian Amazon: from the ground up. Presented at Population Association of America annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, 8–11 May 2002
Bilsborrow RE, Barbieri AF, Pan WK (2004) Changes in population and land use over time in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Acta Amazon 34(4):635–647
Bilsborrow RE, Bremner J, Holt FL (2007) El Comportamiento Reproductivo de Poblaciones IndÃgenas: Un Estudio a la AmazonÃa Ecuatoriana. Centro de Estudios de Población y Desarrollo Social and United Nations Fund for Population Activities, Quito, Ecuador
Blaikie P, Brookfield H (1987) Land degradation and society. Metheun, New York
Borgerhoff-Mulder M, Caro TM (1985) The use of quantitative observational techniques in anthropology. Curr Anthropol 26:323–335
Boserup E (1965) The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of Agrarian change under population pressure. Aldine, New York
Brosius JP (1997) Endangered forest, endangered people: environmentalist representations of indigenous knowledge. Hum Ecol 25(1):47–69
Browder J, Godfrey J (1997) Rainforest cities. Columbia University Press, New York
Cabodevilla MA (1989) Memorias de Frontera: Misioneros en el RÃo Aguarico (1954–1984). CICAME, Ecuador
Cabodevilla MA (1997) La Selva de Los Fantasmas Errantes. CICAME, Ecuador
Califano M, Gonzalo JA (1995) Los A’i (Cofán) del RÃo Aguarico, Mito y Cosmovisión. Serie Pueblos del Ecuador, Ediciones Abya Yala, Quito, Ecuador
Cerón MC (1995) EtnobiologÃa de los Cofanes de Dureno. Serie Pueblos del Ecuador, Ediciones Abya Yala, Quito, Ecuador
Conklin BA, Graham LR (1995) The shifting middle ground: Amazonian Indians and eco-politics. Am Anthropol 97:695–710
De La Torre S, De La Torre L, Oña AI (2000) Diagnostico Ambiental, Cultural y Socio Económico de las Cabeceras del RÃo Aguas Negras, en la Reserva de Producción FaunÃstica Cuyabeno y del Centro Siecoya Remolino. PETRAMAZ (Proyecto de Gestión Ambiental: Explotación PetrolÃfera y Desarrollo Sostenible en la AmazonÃa Ecuatoriana), European Commission and Ministry of Environment of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
Entwisle B, Stern PC (2005) Population, land use and environment: research directions. National Research Council, Washington DC
Fisher WH (2000) Rainforest exchanges: industry and community on an Amazonian frontier. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2005) State of the World’s Forests 2005. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome
Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52:143–150
Godoy RA (2001) Indians, markets and rainforests: theory, methods, analysis. Columbia University Press, New York
Gray CL, Bilsborrow RE, Bremner JL, Lu F (2008) Indigenous land use in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon: a cross-cultural and multilevel analysis. Hum Ecol 36:97–109
Hendricks JW (1988) Power and knowledge: discourse and ideological transformation among the Shuar. Am Ethnol 15:216–238
Hern WM (1991) Effects of cultural change on health and fertility in Amazonian Indian societies: recent research and projections. Popul Environ 13(1):23–43
Hern WM (1992) Polygyny and fertility among the Shipibo of the Peruvian Amazon. Popul Stud 46:53–64
Holt FL, Bilsborrow RE, Oña AI (2004) Demography, household economics, and land and resource use of five indigenous populations in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon: a summary of ethnographic research. Carolina Population Center Occasional Paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Instituto Nacional de EstadÃstica y Census (2001) Censo de Población y de Vivienda – Resultados. Electronic document. http://www.inec.gov.ec
Irvine D (2000) Indigenous federations and the market: the Runa of Napo, Ecuador. In: Weber R, Butler J, Larson P (eds) Indigenous peoples and conservation organizations: experiences in collaboration. World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC, pp 21–46
Kimerling J (1991) Amazon crude. Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington DC
Laurian L, Bilsborrow R, Murphy L (1998) Migration decisions among settler families in the Ecuadorian Amazon: the second generation. Res Rural Sociol Dev 7:169–195
Lu FE (1999) Changes in subsistence patterns and resource use of the Huaorani Indians in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Malthus TR (1798) An eassy on the principle of population, London
Myers N (1988) Threatened biotas: hotspots in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8:1–20
Pan W, Bilsborrow RE (2005) The use of a multilevel statistical model to analyze factors influencing land use: a study of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global Planet Change 47:232–252
Pan WK, Erlien C (2004) Impact of population-environment dynamics on human health in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Presented at Annual Meeting of American Public Health Association, Washington DC
Pichón FJ (1997) Colonist land-allocation decisions, land use, and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon Frontier. Econ Dev Cult Change 45(4):707–744
Pitman N, Terborgh J, Silman M, Nunez P, Neill D, Ceron C, Palacios W, Aulestia M (2002) A comparison of tree species diversity in two upper Amazonian forests. Ecology 83:3210–3224
Redford KH (1990) The ecologically noble savage. Orion (Summer):25–29
Redford KH (1992) The empty forest. BioScience 42:412–422
Romoleroux K, Foster R, Valencia R, Condit R, Balslev H, Losos E (1997) Especies Leñosas Encontradas en Dos Hectáreas de un Bosque de la AmazonÃa Ecuatoriana. In: Valencia R, Balslev H (eds) Estudios Sobre Diversidad y EcologÃa de Plantas. PontÃfica Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador, pp 189–215
Rudel TK (1983) Roads, speculators, and colonization in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Hum Ecol 11:385–403
Rudel TK, Bates D, Machinguiashi R (2002) Ecologically noble amerindians? cattle ranching and cash cropping among the Shuar and Colonists in Ecuador. Lat Am Res Rev 37:144–159
Terborgh J (1999) Requiem for nature. Island, Washington DC
Valencia R, Balslev H, Paz y Miño G (1994) High tree alpha-diversity in Amazonian Ecuador. Biodivers Conserv 3:21–28
Vickers W (1989) Los Sionas y Secoyas. Su Adaptación al Ambiente Amazónico, Abya-Yala, Quito, Ecuador
Yost JA, Kelley PM (1983) Shotguns, blowguns, and spears: the analysis of technological efficiency. In: Hames RB, Vickers WT (eds) Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Academic, New York, pp 189–224
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for funding from the National Institutes of Health (RO1-HD38777); for comments on a previous draft from the editors and anonymous reviewers; for the collaboration of our two subcontractors, Fundación Ecociencia and Centro de Estudios sobre Población y Desarrollo Social (both in Quito, Ecuador); and to the Spatial Analysis Unit of the Carolina Population Center, particularly Brian Frizzelle. Finally, we thank our principal Ecuadorian colleagues, Ana Oña and Francis Baquero, for assistance in fieldwork; our colleague, Bruce Winterhalder for suggestions in the design phase of the ethnographic project; Jason Bremner and Clark Gray for data cleaning and analysis; all the ethnographers who carried out the intensive fieldwork; and the residents of the 36 indigenous study villages for their collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lu, F., Bilsborrow, R.E. (2011). A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human Impacts on the Rainforest Environment in Ecuador. In: Cincotta, R., Gorenflo, L. (eds) Human Population. Ecological Studies, vol 214. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16707-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16707-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16706-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16707-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)