Skip to main content

A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human Impacts on the Rainforest Environment in Ecuador

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Population

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 214))

Abstract

Renowned for biological diversity, Amazonian rainforests are also regions of high cultural diversity. However, in recent decades, most indigenous rainforest people have become settled and acquired titles to large tropical forest areas, are increasingly integrating into the market economy, and are experiencing rapid sociocultural change. In this chapter, we examine five ethnic groups in the northern Ecuadorian Amazon and highlight the importance of sociocultural and economic contexts in understanding indigenous patterns of forest use. Using ethnographic and survey data collected in 2001, we compare and contrast these indigenous populations in terms of demographic characteristics, involvement in the market economy, and patterns of forest conversion and faunal exploitation, observing different degrees of external pressures and opportunities, cultural values, and historical constraints, which, taken together, influence their choices about resource use and market contact and their long-run prospects for cultural survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In some communities, several households far from the community center were excluded from the time use study and the household diaries as they could not be routinely visited in the circuit of random visits.

  2. 2.

    When necessary, an interpreter was recruited from the community to assist. This was necessary only about 10% of the time, mainly with older women in Cofán and Huaorani communities.

  3. 3.

    TFR is the number of live births that a woman would be expected to have during her lifetime based on current fertility levels, viz. age-specific fertility rates of women aged 15–19, 20–24, …, to 45–49. The TFR is the sum of the age-specific fertility rates for the seven age groups of women, each of which is based on the sum of births in a year to females of that age group divided by the number of women of that age group. It is a widely used indicator of period fertility.

  4. 4.

    These numbers are actually based on preliminary tabulations from the second or survey phase of the project, based on replies from 289–298 wives of heads of households in 28 communities. The 53% figure is still much lower than the figure for colonist women (70%) – see Bilsborrow et al. (2004).

  5. 5.

    Data from the household surveys of rural colonist populations in 1999 and of indigenous populations in 2001 indicate a striking increase in immunization of children of both indigenous and colonist children in the Ecuadorian Amazon between the 1980s and 1990s (Pan and Erlien 2004).

  6. 6.

    However, at the time of the study, tourism levels had dramatically declined, which is likely to have elevated rates of hunting from their usual level.

References

  • Albuja L, Cáceres F, Almendáriz A (2000) Diagnóstico ambiental en el sector ampliado del convenio entre el Ministerio del Ambiente y la Comunidad Cofán de Zábalo, Reserva de Producción Faunística Cuyabeno. Informe Final Convenioo, Proyecto PETRAMAZ-Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman S (1987) Swidden in Amazonia and the Amazon Rim. In: Turner BL II, Brush SB (eds) Comparative farming systems. Gilford, New York, pp 55–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow RE (1987) Population pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: a conceptual framework and recent evidence. World Dev 15(2):183–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow RE, Vallejo L (2002) Urbanization, infrastructure change and development in the Ecuadorian Amazon: from the ground up. Presented at Population Association of America annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, 8–11 May 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow RE, Barbieri AF, Pan WK (2004) Changes in population and land use over time in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Acta Amazon 34(4):635–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow RE, Bremner J, Holt FL (2007) El Comportamiento Reproductivo de Poblaciones Indígenas: Un Estudio a la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Centro de Estudios de Población y Desarrollo Social and United Nations Fund for Population Activities, Quito, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Brookfield H (1987) Land degradation and society. Metheun, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff-Mulder M, Caro TM (1985) The use of quantitative observational techniques in anthropology. Curr Anthropol 26:323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boserup E (1965) The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of Agrarian change under population pressure. Aldine, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosius JP (1997) Endangered forest, endangered people: environmentalist representations of indigenous knowledge. Hum Ecol 25(1):47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browder J, Godfrey J (1997) Rainforest cities. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabodevilla MA (1989) Memorias de Frontera: Misioneros en el Río Aguarico (1954–1984). CICAME, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabodevilla MA (1997) La Selva de Los Fantasmas Errantes. CICAME, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Califano M, Gonzalo JA (1995) Los A’i (Cofán) del Río Aguarico, Mito y Cosmovisión. Serie Pueblos del Ecuador, Ediciones Abya Yala, Quito, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerón MC (1995) Etnobiología de los Cofanes de Dureno. Serie Pueblos del Ecuador, Ediciones Abya Yala, Quito, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin BA, Graham LR (1995) The shifting middle ground: Amazonian Indians and eco-politics. Am Anthropol 97:695–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Torre S, De La Torre L, Oña AI (2000) Diagnostico Ambiental, Cultural y Socio Económico de las Cabeceras del Río Aguas Negras, en la Reserva de Producción Faunística Cuyabeno y del Centro Siecoya Remolino. PETRAMAZ (Proyecto de Gestión Ambiental: Explotación Petrolífera y Desarrollo Sostenible en la Amazonía Ecuatoriana), European Commission and Ministry of Environment of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwisle B, Stern PC (2005) Population, land use and environment: research directions. National Research Council, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher WH (2000) Rainforest exchanges: industry and community on an Amazonian frontier. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2005) State of the World’s Forests 2005. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy RA (2001) Indians, markets and rainforests: theory, methods, analysis. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray CL, Bilsborrow RE, Bremner JL, Lu F (2008) Indigenous land use in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon: a cross-cultural and multilevel analysis. Hum Ecol 36:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks JW (1988) Power and knowledge: discourse and ideological transformation among the Shuar. Am Ethnol 15:216–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hern WM (1991) Effects of cultural change on health and fertility in Amazonian Indian societies: recent research and projections. Popul Environ 13(1):23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hern WM (1992) Polygyny and fertility among the Shipibo of the Peruvian Amazon. Popul Stud 46:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt FL, Bilsborrow RE, Oña AI (2004) Demography, household economics, and land and resource use of five indigenous populations in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon: a summary of ethnographic research. Carolina Population Center Occasional Paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Census (2001) Censo de Población y de Vivienda – Resultados. Electronic document. http://www.inec.gov.ec

  • Irvine D (2000) Indigenous federations and the market: the Runa of Napo, Ecuador. In: Weber R, Butler J, Larson P (eds) Indigenous peoples and conservation organizations: experiences in collaboration. World Wildlife Fund, Washington DC, pp 21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimerling J (1991) Amazon crude. Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurian L, Bilsborrow R, Murphy L (1998) Migration decisions among settler families in the Ecuadorian Amazon: the second generation. Res Rural Sociol Dev 7:169–195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu FE (1999) Changes in subsistence patterns and resource use of the Huaorani Indians in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus TR (1798) An eassy on the principle of population, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N (1988) Threatened biotas: hotspots in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan W, Bilsborrow RE (2005) The use of a multilevel statistical model to analyze factors influencing land use: a study of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global Planet Change 47:232–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan WK, Erlien C (2004) Impact of population-environment dynamics on human health in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Presented at Annual Meeting of American Public Health Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichón FJ (1997) Colonist land-allocation decisions, land use, and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon Frontier. Econ Dev Cult Change 45(4):707–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitman N, Terborgh J, Silman M, Nunez P, Neill D, Ceron C, Palacios W, Aulestia M (2002) A comparison of tree species diversity in two upper Amazonian forests. Ecology 83:3210–3224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redford KH (1990) The ecologically noble savage. Orion (Summer):25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford KH (1992) The empty forest. BioScience 42:412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romoleroux K, Foster R, Valencia R, Condit R, Balslev H, Losos E (1997) Especies Leñosas Encontradas en Dos Hectáreas de un Bosque de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. In: Valencia R, Balslev H (eds) Estudios Sobre Diversidad y Ecología de Plantas. Pontífica Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador, pp 189–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel TK (1983) Roads, speculators, and colonization in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Hum Ecol 11:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel TK, Bates D, Machinguiashi R (2002) Ecologically noble amerindians? cattle ranching and cash cropping among the Shuar and Colonists in Ecuador. Lat Am Res Rev 37:144–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J (1999) Requiem for nature. Island, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia R, Balslev H, Paz y Miño G (1994) High tree alpha-diversity in Amazonian Ecuador. Biodivers Conserv 3:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers W (1989) Los Sionas y Secoyas. Su Adaptación al Ambiente Amazónico, Abya-Yala, Quito, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost JA, Kelley PM (1983) Shotguns, blowguns, and spears: the analysis of technological efficiency. In: Hames RB, Vickers WT (eds) Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Academic, New York, pp 189–224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for funding from the National Institutes of Health (RO1-HD38777); for comments on a previous draft from the editors and anonymous reviewers; for the collaboration of our two subcontractors, Fundación Ecociencia and Centro de Estudios sobre Población y Desarrollo Social (both in Quito, Ecuador); and to the Spatial Analysis Unit of the Carolina Population Center, particularly Brian Frizzelle. Finally, we thank our principal Ecuadorian colleagues, Ana Oña and Francis Baquero, for assistance in fieldwork; our colleague, Bruce Winterhalder for suggestions in the design phase of the ethnographic project; Jason Bremner and Clark Gray for data cleaning and analysis; all the ethnographers who carried out the intensive fieldwork; and the residents of the 36 indigenous study villages for their collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flora Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lu, F., Bilsborrow, R.E. (2011). A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human Impacts on the Rainforest Environment in Ecuador. In: Cincotta, R., Gorenflo, L. (eds) Human Population. Ecological Studies, vol 214. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16707-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics