Abstract
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Julie M. Keller MD, Andrew N. Pollak MD
In damage control for trauma patients, the main tenets are to perform temporary operative procedures to provide time for physiologic stabilization before definitive surgical care. There are four distinct phases of the damage control philosophy: the first is recognition of the at risk patient; next, temporizing operative procedures to limit ongoing injury; third, intensive care unit (ICU) care for resuscitation; and finally, definitive procedures in the OR.
Hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death after trauma, and strategies for preserving vital function while preventing further blood loss allow for stabilization and safe transport. In the hospital phase, damage control resuscitation is focused on preventing or correcting the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy. Orthopaedic care of patients in extremis has undergone an evolution and several distinct eras of care can be identified, each built on outcomes data from orthopaedics and general surgery damage control strategies, and recognition of the important influence of the inflammatory cascade on multisystem outcomes. In current damage control orthopaedic strategy, the first surgical priority is of course to save the patient's life, then limb when feasible. Initial procedures should be limited to two hours or less. Open fractures should be irrigated and debrided. Hemorrhage control is paramount for patients in extremis; stabilization of major fractures is secondary. For unstable patients, major fractures should be stabilized with external fixators. For borderline patients, definitive fixation can be undertaken within the 2 hour time limit. Stable patients can undergo primary definitive fixation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rotondo, M.F., et al.: “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguination penetrating abdominal injury. J. Trauma 35, 375–383 (1993)
Schwab, C.W.: Introduction: damage control at the start of 21st century. Injury 35, 639–641 (2004)
Eiseman, B., et al.: Feasibility of damage control surgery in the management of military combat casualties. Arch. Surg. 135, 1323–1327 (2000)
Doyle, G.S., Taillac, P.P.: Tourniquets: a review of current use with proposals for expaded prehospital use. Prehosp. Emerg. Care 12, 241–256 (2008)
Sambasivan, C.N., Schreiber, M.A.: Emerging therapies in traumatic hemorrhage control. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 15, 560–568 (2009)
Bickell, W.H., et al.: Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetratiung torso injuries. N Engl J. Med. 331, 1105–1109 (1994)
Hambly, P.R., Dutton, R.P.: Excess mortality associated with the use of a rapid infusion system at a level I trauma center. Resuscitation 31, 127–133 (1996)
Dutton, R.P., Mackenzie, C.F., Scalea, T.M.: Hypotensive resuscitation during active hemorrhage: impact on in-hospital mortality. J. Trauma 52, 1141–1146 (2002)
Ertmer, C., et al.: Relevance of nonalbumin colloids in intensive care medicine. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anesthesiol. 23, 193–212 (2009)
Cosgriff, N., et al.: Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidosis. J. Trauma 42, 857–861 (1997)
Hildebrand, F., et al.: Damage control: extremities. Injury 35, 678–689 (2004)
Seibel, R., et al.: Blunt multiple trauma (ISS 36), femur traction, and the pulmonary failure-septic state. Ann. Surg. 202(3), 283–293 (1985)
Goris, R.J.A., et al.: Early osteosynthesis and prophylactice mechanical ventilation int he multitrauma patient. J. Trauma 22(11), 895–903 (1982)
Pape, H.-C., et al.: Timing of fracture fixation in multitrauma patients: the role of early total care and damage control surgery. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 17(9), 541–549 (2009)
Taeger, G., et al.: Damage control orthopaedics in patients with multiple injuries is effective, time saving and safe. J. Trauma 59, 409–416 (2005)
Bone, L.B., Johnson, K.D., Weigelt, J., Scheinberg, R.: Early versus delayed stabilization fo femoral fractures: a prospective randomized study. J. Bone Joint Surg. 71(3), 336–340 (1989)
Pape, H.-C., et al.: Impact of Intramedullary Instrumentation versus damage control for femoral fractures on immunoinflammatory parameters: prospective randomized analysis by the EPOFF study group. J. Trauma 55(1), 7–13 (2003)
Pape, H.-C., et al.: Major secondary surgery in blunt trauma patients and perioperative cytokine liberation: determination of the clinical relevance of biochemical markers. J. Trauma 50(6), 989–1000 (2001)
Anwar, I.A., et al.: Femur fractures and lung complications. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 422, 71–76 (2004)
Tornetta III, P., Tibuezi, D.: The treatment of femoral shaft fractures using intramedullary interlocked nails with and without intramedullary reaming: a preliminary report. J. Orthop. Trauma 11, 89–92 (1997)
Le Toan et al. Early results of femur fractures treated with reamed vs. unreamed intramedullary nailing: a prospective randomized study. In: Final Program of the 1996 Annual Meeting and Membership Directory of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Boston, MA (1996)
Bosse, M.J., et al.: Adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, and mortality following thoracic injury and a femoral fracture treated either with intramedullary nailing with reaming or with a plate. J. Bone Joint Surg. 79A, 799–809 (1997)
The Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society: Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: comparison of the rate of ards in multiple injured patients. J. Orthop. Trauma 20(6), 384–387 (2006)
Scalea, T.M., et al.: External fixation as a bridge to intramedullary nailing for patients with multiple injuries and with femur fractures: damage control orthopaedics. J. Trauma 48(4), 613–623 (2000)
Nowotarski, P.J., et al.: Conversion of external fixation to intramedullary nailing for fractures of the shaft of the femur in multiply injured patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. 82(6), 781–788 (2000)
Pape, H.-C., et al.: Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk. Ann. Surg. 246, 491–499 (2007)
Morshed, S., et al.: Delayed internal fixation of femoral shaft fracture reduces mortality among patients with multisystem trauma. J. Bone Joint Surg. 91, 3–13 (2009)
O’Toole, R.V., et al.: Resuscitation before stabilization of femoral fractures limits acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with multiple traumatic injuries despite low use of dmamge control orthopaedics. J. Trauma 67(5), 1013–1021 (2009)
Shapiro, M.B., Jenkins, D.H., Schwab, C.W., Rotondo, M.F.: Damage control: collective review. J. Trauma 49, 969–978 (2000)
McGonigal, M.D., Schwab, C.W., Kauder, D.R.: Supplemental emergent chest computed tomography in the management of blunt torso trauma. J. Trauma 30, 1431–1435 (1990)
Karaaslan, T., et al.: Traumatic chest lesion in patients with severe head trauma: a comparative study with computed tomography and conventional chest roentograms. J. Trauma 39, 1081–1086 (1995)
Pape, H.-C., Giannoudis, P., Krettek, C.: The timing of fracture treatment in polytrauma patient: the relevance of damage control orthopaedic surgery. Am. J. Surg. 183, 622–629 (2002)
Giannoudis, P.V., Pape, H.C.: Damage control orthopaedics in unstable pelvic ring injuries. Injury 35, 671–677 (2004)
Solomon, L.B., et al.: The subcristal pelvic external fixator: technique, results, and rationale. J. Orthop. Trauma 23, 365–369 (2009)
Waikakul, S., et al.: An aiming device for pin fixation at the iliac crest for external fixation in unstable pelvic fracture. Injury 29, 757–762 (1998)
Rommens, P.M., Hessmann, M.H.: Staged reconstruction of pelvic ring disruption: differences in morbidity, mortality, radiologic results, and functional outcomes between B1, B2/B3, and C type lesions. J. Orthop. Trauma 16, 92–98 (2002)
Palmer, S., Fairbank, A.C., Bircher, M.: Surgical complications and implications of external fixation of pelvic fractures. Injury 28, 649–653 (1997)
Lindhal, J., et al.: Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of pelvic ring injuries. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 81-B, 955–962 (1999)
Ertel, W., et al.: Control of severe hemorrhage using C-clamp pelvic packing in multiply injured patients with pelvic ring disruption. J. Orthop. Trauma 15(7), 468–474 (2001)
Heini, P.F., Witt, J., Ganz, R.: The pelvic C-clamp for the emergency treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries: a report on clinical experience of 30 cases. Injury 27, S-A38–S-A45 (1996)
Sadri, H., et al.: Control of severe hemorrhage using C-clamp and arterial embolization in hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic ring disruption. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 125(7), 443–447 (2005)
Agolini, S.F., et al.: Arterial embolization is a rapid and effective technique for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage. J. Trauma 43, 395–399 (1997)
Ben-Menachem, Y., et al.: Hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures: causes, diagnosis, and emergent management. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1571, 1005–1014 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Keller, J.M., Pollak, A.N. (2011). Damage Control Orthopaedics. In: Lerner, A., Soudry, M. (eds) Armed Conflict Injuries to the Extremities. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16155-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16155-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16154-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16155-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)